Who’s violent (Page 2): You betcha !

agatemaggot Loc: waterloo iowa

LogicallyRight wrote:

Another good one. Thanks and ignore the usual trolls. They can't handle the t***h.

Logically Right

You betcha !

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

lpnmajor wrote:

You look weak trying to justify this fiasco.

So, no one is trying to justify the invasion of th ecapital building but what we are saying is that Trump DID NOT incite it any more than you and your democrap soundboxes incited the r**ting, burning, l**ting and k*****g done by B*M and A****A.

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

GoCubs wrote:

Says the one who adamantly averred that ALL who st... (show quote)

***Hey Illogically Wrong...
>>>Still logically Right and more so then you will ever be
***what happened to all the A****a infiltrators of The Capitol?
>>>Yes, I made that accusation and it was logically right. I saw video of A****a arriving. I saw video of Trump supporters pulling down people trying to break in. I heard testimony of people who said they saw someone shoot a flare at the cops and then run when they saw him. These were the very tactics of a****a for at least the last 8 months and well before that. I said all along that those people breaking in were using a****a attacks of inflitrating other protests. Yes, my assumption was based on information I had, and based on months of a****a Insurrestionists acting out day after day. That was LOGICALLY RIGHT
***You remember.... the ones you assured us were the violent mob that stormed The Capitol? Where are they?
>>> I agree that there were many bad elements on the right that were behind the break in of the Capital Building. Saisified?
***Why have none of them been arrested?
>>>The more important questions are why weren't a****a arrested by one Democrat entity after another and when they were apprehended? Why were almost all immediately released by Democrat States Attorneys? Did this eventually encourage those that broke into the Capital Building that there would be no consequences? Why would they think they were a part of I**********n when none of these other attacks all summer and fall were not considered I**********n, when they were far more I**********n then 1*6.
***Why has EVERY SINGLE PERSON ARRESTED BEEN A TRUMPSTER?
>>>They haven't. Many have been avid Trump supporters and many were also just avid supporters of other causes trying to make their points through association with Trump supporters.
***What gives? Can you NEVER admit that you were wrong?
>>>I did under the narrow assumptions I made based on the available information at the time. The more important question is why you can never admit you are wrong despite how often, actually near 100% of the time, you are shown or proven to be wrong? Why you feel the need for cheap slurs? Why you need to try and twist anything and everything into a cheap childish attack agains President Trump, a greater man then you will ever be. You aren't worthy of shining his shoes.

Logically Right

woodguru

LogicallyRight wrote:

Another good one. Thanks and ignore the usual trolls. They can't handle the t***h.

Logically Right

The t***h was at the capital for all to see

woodguru

LogicallyRight wrote:

br ***what happened to all the A****a infiltrator... (show quote)

Sounds like the same exact "argument" put together to prove massive v***r f***d, we're still waiting on the proof.

moldyoldy

LogicallyRight wrote:

***Hey Illogically Wrong...
>>>Still logically Right and more so then you will ever be
***what happened to all the A****a infiltrators of The Capitol?
>>>Yes, I made that accusation and it was logically right. I saw video of A****a arriving. I saw video of Trump supporters pulling down people trying to break in. I heard testimony of people who said they saw someone shoot a flare at the cops and then run when they saw him. These were the very tactics of a****a for at least the last 8 months and well before that. I said all along that those people breaking in were using a****a attacks of inflitrating other protests. Yes, my assumption was based on information I had, and based on months of a****a Insurrestionists acting out day after day. That was LOGICALLY RIGHT
***You remember.... the ones you assured us were the violent mob that stormed The Capitol? Where are they?
>>> I agree that there were many bad elements on the right that were behind the break in of the Capital Building. Saisified?
***Why have none of them been arrested?
>>>The more important questions are why weren't a****a arrested by one Democrat entity after another and when they were apprehended? Why were almost all immediately released by Democrat States Attorneys? Did this eventually encourage those that broke into the Capital Building that there would be no consequences? Why would they think they were a part of I**********n when none of these other attacks all summer and fall were not considered I**********n, when they were far more I**********n then 1*6.
***Why has EVERY SINGLE PERSON ARRESTED BEEN A TRUMPSTER?
>>>They haven't. Many have been avid Trump supporters and many were also just avid supporters of other causes trying to make their points through association with Trump supporters.
***What gives? Can you NEVER admit that you were wrong?
>>>I did under the narrow assumptions I made based on the available information at the time. The more important question is why you can never admit you are wrong despite how often, actually near 100% of the time, you are shown or proven to be wrong? Why you feel the need for cheap slurs? Why you need to try and twist anything and everything into a cheap childish attack agains President Trump, a greater man then you will ever be. You aren't worthy of shining his shoes.

Logically Right

***Hey Illogically Wrong... br >>>Still ... (show quote)

Somebody said there was v***r f***d and you believed that too.

Dwbill Loc: Sunvalley,NV

LogicallyRight wrote:

***Hey Illogically Wrong...
>>>Still logically Right and more so then you will ever be
***what happened to all the A****a infiltrators of The Capitol?
>>>Yes, I made that accusation and it was logically right. I saw video of A****a arriving. I saw video of Trump supporters pulling down people trying to break in. I heard testimony of people who said they saw someone shoot a flare at the cops and then run when they saw him. These were the very tactics of a****a for at least the last 8 months and well before that. I said all along that those people breaking in were using a****a attacks of inflitrating other protests. Yes, my assumption was based on information I had, and based on months of a****a Insurrestionists acting out day after day. That was LOGICALLY RIGHT
***You remember.... the ones you assured us were the violent mob that stormed The Capitol? Where are they?
>>> I agree that there were many bad elements on the right that were behind the break in of the Capital Building. Saisified?
***Why have none of them been arrested?
>>>The more important questions are why weren't a****a arrested by one Democrat entity after another and when they were apprehended? Why were almost all immediately released by Democrat States Attorneys? Did this eventually encourage those that broke into the Capital Building that there would be no consequences? Why would they think they were a part of I**********n when none of these other attacks all summer and fall were not considered I**********n, when they were far more I**********n then 1*6.
***Why has EVERY SINGLE PERSON ARRESTED BEEN A TRUMPSTER?
>>>They haven't. Many have been avid Trump supporters and many were also just avid supporters of other causes trying to make their points through association with Trump supporters.
***What gives? Can you NEVER admit that you were wrong?
>>>I did under the narrow assumptions I made based on the available information at the time. The more important question is why you can never admit you are wrong despite how often, actually near 100% of the time, you are shown or proven to be wrong? Why you feel the need for cheap slurs? Why you need to try and twist anything and everything into a cheap childish attack agains President Trump, a greater man then you will ever be. You aren't worthy of shining his shoes.

Logically Right

***Hey Illogically Wrong... br >>>Still ... (show quote)

I commend you for your statement ,how very true !!! As usual !!!!

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

woodguru wrote:

Sounds like the same exact "argument" put together to prove massive v***r f***d, we're still waiting on the proof.

You haven't made a serious attempt to look at any of the evidence shown and alleged since 11/3. And you will never have the guts to take a serious look and a serious evaluation. It goes against your job as a troll.

Logically Right

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

moldyoldy wrote:

Somebody said there was v***r f***d and you believed that too.

I saw enough evidence, testimony and videos to form a firm conviction of massive irregularities that the Democrats refuse to look at and wouldn't acknowledge if proven.

Logically Right

Dwbill Loc: Sunvalley,NV

LogicallyRight wrote:

I saw enough evidence, testimony and videos to form a firm conviction of massive irregularities that the Democrats refuse to look at and wouldn't acknowledge if proven.

Logically Right

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

Dwbill wrote:

I commend you for your statement ,how very true !!! As usual !!!!

Thank you. My detractors just seem to want to sling s**tte and lies and accolades at the i**********nist Democrats.
Although it is fun to totally dispute them, I really want the t***h and then let the s**tte fall where it may. They seem to want to block and distort the t***h at every opportunity. Pathetic. And they never admit the slightest error in judgment although they are massive.

Logically Right

moldyoldy

LogicallyRight wrote:

I saw enough evidence, testimony and videos to form a firm conviction of massive irregularities that the Democrats refuse to look at and wouldn't acknowledge if proven.

Logically Right

Like the after hours v**e counting?

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

moldyoldy wrote:

Like the after hours v**e counting?

***Like the after hours v**e counting?
>>>That is exactly one of the things we are complaining about. And without allowing in legal e******n observers.

Logically Right

moldyoldy

LogicallyRight wrote:

***Like the after hours v**e counting?
>>>That is exactly one of the things we are complaining about. And without allowing in legal e******n observers.

Logically Right

https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewalsh/2020/12/04/no-atlanta-didnt-count-b****ts-in-secret-or-in-suitcases/amp/

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

moldyoldy wrote:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewalsh/2020/12/04/no-atlanta-didnt-count-b****ts-in-secret-or-in-suitcases/amp/

The evidence has not been heard. Period. This article proves nothing. Things that are not adjudicated simply "are not."