Can you please tell me what "Race" have to do with what happened on Wednesday? (Page 3): I agree Demon-crate are the worst c*******t Marxist N**is & Republicans are close second...

Army

Carol Kelly wrote:

The neo N**is are Socialist Democrats like Schumer, Pelosi and you.

I agree Demon-crate are the worst c*******t Marxist N**is & Republicans are close second let's clean house

moldyoldy

Army wrote:

I agree Demon-crate are the worst c*******t Marxist N**is & Republicans are close second let's clean house

The house will be cleaned of i**********nists.

Wolfman888

Army wrote:

I agree Demon-crate are the worst c*******t Marxist N**is & Republicans are close second let's clean house

Big talk ! From a keyboardist.

C'mon down to DC the 20th.

See how far you get...

JohnCorrespondent

proud republican wrote:

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/533504-pelosi-says-r****rs-chose-their-whiteness-over-democracy

The article does not make it clear, what "Race" has to do with it.

I suspect Ms Pelosi did not make it clear, either.

2 or 3 other repliers have explained it better than the article did.

(a) To some of us, Trump supporters seem a lot more r****t than we are. That's because of what they say, how they talk, what they do, and what they want to do or which policies they support or reject.

An aside about the terms "r****t" etc.: I believe the terms "race", "r****m", "white", "black", etc. are often misused or overused. (Sometimes some other word, like "poor", is a more relevant description of the situation.) But it is still true that there's a lot of r****m in the U.S.A. It's real, not just something imagined. Black people see it and suffer it. A lot of white people (including myself) don't usually notice it much, but it's real anyway -- we just aren't right there in the middle of it where we have to see it. Murders (or "k*****gs") such as that of G****e F***d and Trayvon Martin have a heavy r****t element in them; that's because the reason they were murdered (or "k**led") is mainly that they were black -- not necessarily that the k**ler thought "I'll k**l him because he's black" but because the k**ler is used to thinking that a black person must be guilty of something, or dangerous, or that it's more acceptable to k**l a black person. If G****e F***d or Trayvon Martin had been white but in the same exact place doing the same exact thing and with the same exact history, then it's much less likely they'd have been murdered (or, "k**led").

(b) The J*** 6 storming of the U.S. Capitol building (for example) is being compared and contrasted to (for example) the June 1 protest against police brutality ( https://www.npr.org/2020/06/01/867532070/trumps-unannounced-church-visit-angers-church-officials ). In one of those two events, a lot of armed people broke into the U.S. Capitol, k**led at least one police officer in there, ransacked the place, and threatened lawmakers. In the other event, a lot of people were (apparently) not armed and were just standing around holding up signs and perhaps chanting something. So, in which event is a heavy police action used to stop those people? And why that event and not the other?

If you think about those two events, and compare what happened, pretty soon you'll realize that race is a factor in why one group was treated one way, and the other group was treated in a much different way:

What would have happened if a few thousand black people showed up at the U.S. Capitol building and broke into it and k**led a police officer in there and ransacked the place and threatened lawmakers? The police response would have been swift, tear gas would have been used quickly, & police would have gotten violent: it would have been a big police response really soon in the event. But in the actual event on J*** 6 when white people were breaking into the Capitol building, it took an hour or two before the police or national guard did much about it.

What would have happened if white people had gathered with signs in front of the White House and maybe chanted something and were standing around, not invading any building, and not saying anything about "Black L***s M****r" or anything like that, but were instead protesting about something not having anything to do with "white", "black", or "race"? What if they were protesting about the p**********l e******n? How would they have been treated? Would the police in full r**t gear have come out and teargassed them and used concussion grenades against them?

Wolfman888

JohnCorrespondent wrote:

The article does not make it clear, what "Race" has to do with it.

I suspect Ms Pelosi did not make it clear, either.

2 or 3 other repliers have explained it better than the article did.

(a) To some of us, Trump supporters seem a lot more r****t than we are. That's because of what they say, how they talk, what they do, and what they want to do or which policies they support or reject.

An aside about the terms "r****t" etc.: I believe the terms "race", "r****m", "white", "black", etc. are often misused or overused. (Sometimes some other word, like "poor", is a more relevant description of the situation.) But it is still true that there's a lot of r****m in the U.S.A. It's real, not just something imagined. Black people see it and suffer it. A lot of white people (including myself) don't usually notice it much, but it's real anyway -- we just aren't right there in the middle of it where we have to see it. Murders (or "k*****gs") such as that of G****e F***d and Trayvon Martin have a heavy r****t element in them; that's because the reason they were murdered (or "k**led") is mainly that they were black -- not necessarily that the k**ler thought "I'll k**l him because he's black" but because the k**ler is used to thinking that a black person must be guilty of something, or dangerous, or that it's more acceptable to k**l a black person. If G****e F***d or Trayvon Martin had been white but in the same exact place doing the same exact thing and with the same exact history, then it's much less likely they'd have been murdered (or, "k**led").

(b) The J*** 6 storming of the U.S. Capitol building (for example) is being compared and contrasted to (for example) the June 1 protest against police brutality ( https://www.npr.org/2020/06/01/867532070/trumps-unannounced-church-visit-angers-church-officials ). In one of those two events, a lot of armed people broke into the U.S. Capitol, k**led at least one police officer in there, ransacked the place, and threatened lawmakers. In the other event, a lot of people were (apparently) not armed and were just standing around holding up signs and perhaps chanting something. So, in which event is a heavy police action used to stop those people? And why that event and not the other?

If you think about those two events, and compare what happened, pretty soon you'll realize that race is a factor in why one group was treated one way, and the other group was treated in a much different way:

What would have happened if a few thousand black people showed up at the U.S. Capitol building and broke into it and k**led a police officer in there and ransacked the place and threatened lawmakers? The police response would have been swift, tear gas would have been used quickly, & police would have gotten violent: it would have been a big police response really soon in the event. But in the actual event on J*** 6 when white people were breaking into the Capitol building, it took an hour or two before the police or national guard did much about it.

What would have happened if white people had gathered with signs in front of the White House and maybe chanted something and were standing around, not invading any building, and not saying anything about "Black L***s M****r" or anything like that, but were instead protesting about something not having anything to do with "white", "black", or "race"? What if they were protesting about the p**********l e******n? How would they have been treated? Would the police in full r**t gear have come out and teargassed them and used concussion grenades against them?

The article does not make it clear, what "Rac... (show quote)

Excellent !

Army

Wolfman888 wrote:

Big talk ! From a keyboardist.

C'mon down to DC the 20th.

See how far you get...

Big enough sounds like your a****a keep talking that's all you got

Headsup

Lonewolf wrote:

Because w***e s*********t are part of Trumps base along with neo N**i's

No basis, no facts. Go play with Jake Tappet head.

SWMBO

moldyoldy wrote:

The house will be cleaned of i**********nists.

In other words you fully intend to put all those who do not accept your Marxist Socialist propaganda in reindoctrination camps. Thanks for warning us. Are you also planning to make us into soylent green? Would not surprise me one bit.

moldyoldy

SWMBO wrote:

In other words you fully intend to put all those who do not accept your Marxist Socialist propaganda in reindoctrination camps. Thanks for warning us. Are you also planning to make us into soylent green? Would not surprise me one bit.

You know very well that violent people broke into the capital and beat cops damaged historic property and threatened the members of congress.

Rose42

Wolfman888 wrote:

Excellent !

Lol

SWMBO

Rose42 wrote:

Lol

Race is part of the equation because the Democrats can use it as a starting point to encourage the kind of chaos that allows them to take over with out any major fight back. It is just another technique that the left has used for years (perfected in Russia years ago, see "Disinformation" by Lt. Gen Ion Pacepa for more information so you will better understand what the Progressives who are now in charge of the Democrat party are doing and be afraid- be truly afraid.

victor doherty

JohnCorrespondent wrote:

The article does not make it clear, what "Race" has to do with it.

I suspect Ms Pelosi did not make it clear, either.

2 or 3 other repliers have explained it better than the article did.

(a) To some of us, Trump supporters seem a lot more r****t than we are. That's because of what they say, how they talk, what they do, and what they want to do or which policies they support or reject.

An aside about the terms "r****t" etc.: I believe the terms "race", "r****m", "white", "black", etc. are often misused or overused. (Sometimes some other word, like "poor", is a more relevant description of the situation.) But it is still true that there's a lot of r****m in the U.S.A. It's real, not just something imagined. Black people see it and suffer it. A lot of white people (including myself) don't usually notice it much, but it's real anyway -- we just aren't right there in the middle of it where we have to see it. Murders (or "k*****gs") such as that of G****e F***d and Trayvon Martin have a heavy r****t element in them; that's because the reason they were murdered (or "k**led") is mainly that they were black -- not necessarily that the k**ler thought "I'll k**l him because he's black" but because the k**ler is used to thinking that a black person must be guilty of something, or dangerous, or that it's more acceptable to k**l a black person. If G****e F***d or Trayvon Martin had been white but in the same exact place doing the same exact thing and with the same exact history, then it's much less likely they'd have been murdered (or, "k**led").

(b) The J*** 6 storming of the U.S. Capitol building (for example) is being compared and contrasted to (for example) the June 1 protest against police brutality ( https://www.npr.org/2020/06/01/867532070/trumps-unannounced-church-visit-angers-church-officials ). In one of those two events, a lot of armed people broke into the U.S. Capitol, k**led at least one police officer in there, ransacked the place, and threatened lawmakers. In the other event, a lot of people were (apparently) not armed and were just standing around holding up signs and perhaps chanting something. So, in which event is a heavy police action used to stop those people? And why that event and not the other?

If you think about those two events, and compare what happened, pretty soon you'll realize that race is a factor in why one group was treated one way, and the other group was treated in a much different way:

What would have happened if a few thousand black people showed up at the U.S. Capitol building and broke into it and k**led a police officer in there and ransacked the place and threatened lawmakers? The police response would have been swift, tear gas would have been used quickly, & police would have gotten violent: it would have been a big police response really soon in the event. But in the actual event on J*** 6 when white people were breaking into the Capitol building, it took an hour or two before the police or national guard did much about it.

What would have happened if white people had gathered with signs in front of the White House and maybe chanted something and were standing around, not invading any building, and not saying anything about "Black L***s M****r" or anything like that, but were instead protesting about something not having anything to do with "white", "black", or "race"? What if they were protesting about the p**********l e******n? How would they have been treated? Would the police in full r**t gear have come out and teargassed them and used concussion grenades against them?

The article does not make it clear, what "Rac... (show quote)

well done tell me what you think of this https://youtu.be/lkWSt7iXTwE

victor doherty

SWMBO wrote:

In other words you fully intend to put all those who do not accept your Marxist Socialist propaganda in reindoctrination camps. Thanks for warning us. Are you also planning to make us into soylent green? Would not surprise me one bit.

boy oh boy when we don't ask the right questions you get this https://youtu.be/lkWSt7iXTwE

JohnCorrespondent

victor doherty wrote:

well done tell me what you think of this https://youtu.be/lkWSt7iXTwE

Don't just put a link. Clicking on mysterious links is hazardous; some of them put v***ses into one's computer. Put a title or enough text so that I can look up the video or page myself.

victor doherty

JohnCorrespondent wrote:

Don't just put a link. Clicking on mysterious links is hazardous; some of them put v***ses into one's computer. Put a title or enough text so that I can look up the video or page myself.

it's a video i made call the state of obvious it's ten minutes