Quakerwidow wrote:
It is more likely that they told you that the Supreme Court is NOT the proper place to bring a traffic violation!
They said I did not have enough proof because I could not identify the driver . I said of course I could,
"I'd recognize that laugh anywhere". Court will "hear" the case next week.
Quakerwidow wrote:
Welcome. Please remember to use "Quote reply" so we will know to whom (and what) you are replying.
So who were you replying to?
BKpeeer wrote:
So who were you replying to?
Lookoutscout and, as I stated earlier, theirs was the only post on the thread when I started posting.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.