SWMBO

V**e Tabulation Data Suggests Nearly 100K V**es “Missing” From Trump Totals
Georgette December 1, 2020 50 States, Donald Trump, Politics Comments Off on V**e Tabulation Data Suggests Nearly 100K V**es “Missing” From Trump Totals
218 Shares
facebook sharing button 146
twitter sharing button 13
pinterest sharing button 7
email sharing button
sharethis sharing button

In the battleground states, D******n made sure that Donald Trump wouldn’t win. But, President Trump received a historic wave of real v**es, forcing them to stop the counting to infuse f**e ones.

Just The News reported on “anomalies” that show missing v**es:

V**e tabulation data in various battleground states contain “anomalies” with massive swings toward Joe Biden that suggest missing b****ts for President Trump, according to data expert Justin Hart, who helped raise millions of dollars for Mitt Romney’s 2012 p**********l campaign.

Trump has retweeted charts from Hart questioning v**e tabulations, including retweeting Hart’s calculation showing that Trump would have had to lose v**es in Pennsylvania if the real-time, individual, timed stamped entries from The New York Times were accurate. Hart said his analysis was used in a Pennsylvania legislative hearing Wednesday with numerous witnesses alleging v***r f***d and v**er irregularities.

“You know what’s even MORE suspicious than BIG v**e dumps giving Biden the lead in WI and MI? Taking AWAY v**es from @realDonaldTrump in Pennsylvania!,” Hart tweeted Nov. 20 in a tweet that Trump retweeted on Tuesday. “This chart: the 25 data dumps where Trump LOST v**es from the D******n feeds. 97,676 v**es LOST! And Biden GAINED 160K+ v**es!”

“There’s a lot of anomalies in that data,” Hart said in an interview with Just the News. “And then I think the real evidence though is in the pure volume, when you have a big batch that comes in at like 96%, for Biden, it’s unclear where they would find enough precincts that would have that many v**es.”

While the Times released percentage changes and did not release raw v**e numbers, Hart said his analysis of Pennsylvania was based on the percentage change that would have had to have occurred to have that level of swing toward Biden and away from Trump, which would yield v**es lost for the president if the tally was accurate.



Pennsylvania has been ground zero for questions about v***r f***d, with a state judge in Pennsylvania on Friday announced she was upholding her earlier injunction against the state’s certification of 2020 e******n results, stating that plaintiffs have “viable claim” that state mail-in b****t rule was illegal. The state Suprem Court later overturned her ruling.

In Georgia, Hart said he spotted a similar trend, with Trump appearing to lose v**es rather than simply seeing his lead shrink or Biden surpass his share of the e*****rate.

“I have no idea if fraud was involved,” Hart tweeted. “There is no audit of what happens between all of the dashboards we watch and when the v**ers v**es. It’s an opaque black box. But between misplaced v**es, thumb drives and algorithms smelling to high heaven – I want more sunlight please.”

Hart said the high prevalence of D******n V****g Systems is a red f**g for him in terms of how many steps that must take place to reduce user error when tabulating v**es. D******n has repeatedly stated there were no problems with its machines during the Nov. 3 e******n.

“When you go look at, for example, the training videos on D******n, you realize how quickly all this can go south,” Hart told Just the News. “There’s so much room for user error. And I’ve worked in enterprise workflows before—both in healthcare and startups and in government, when I was working for different political entities–and one of the things you quickly realize is when you have a workflow or a flow that someone needs to follow, is remove as much user input as needed. Because otherwise there’s just going to be mistakes, and there’s so much room for awfulness there that it just blows the mind. And every IT person is just cringing when they look at these videos.”

Hart said the D******n training videos, for example, shows that when v**es are tallied and they’re ready to be added together, “you go to the shared drive and you select the files that you want to use, and then you upload them, be sure to check this file—so much room for user error, let alone the fraud applications, it’s just a lot of room for error.”

In his analysis of Wisconsin, two days after the e******n, Hart noticed another questionable trend, tweeting out that “49K people v**ed for a Republican House candidate down b****t but DID NOT v**e for Trump. Meanwhile, 64K people v**ed for Biden and did NOT v**e for a Democrat house candidate. Also, 14,952 people DID NOT v**e for a house candidate and just v**ed for Prez. Ok.”

…

“I make clear that the real issue is the opaqueness of the entire endeavor,” Hart said in a Wednesday tweet. “I would love to be proven wrong about the fraud… but the entire pipeline in between v**es and dashboard is dark and smelly frankly.”



The post V**e Tabulation Data Suggests Nearly 100K V**es “Missing” From Trump Totals appeared first on Conservative Daily Post.
Like this Article? Share it!

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Weasel Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!

So what's next. This alone is enough to prove them dirty as hell.
Sharing this with everyone I know

SWMBO

And as usual, you add to the conversation with your great wisdom and clever remarks.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Have been watching the hearings in Michigan. Some brave Americans have come forward with written affidavits of fraud and abuse. I am sickened by what I have heard and proud at the same time. One witness has already had to move, change her phone number and move her children out of school, because the tolerant cowardly left has threatened her and her children.
Time for Trump to declare the e******n invalid and let the chips fall where they may.

11Bravo

The time is long overdue.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Watch the court case tomorrow at 12:00 in Nevada.

kemmer

That's because the trumpsters stayed home.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Trump received the most v**es for a sitting president in our history. I***ts don’t know this.

11Bravo

Roger that.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

grumbledog

Well even if Trump lose 100k v**es he still lose by 5,000,000 v**es. I know Trump like to claim how could 80,000,000 people for Biden, well what makes him think that 74,000,000 would v**e for him.

It over Trump has lose to “the worst candidate for President of all Times”

Pretty pathetic

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

100,000 won't make up the difference, since biden would still have 9,900,000 more v**es than trump.

Big Kahuna

Slo T*****r Joe Bribem never had 10 million more v**es than Trump. The dems forged, printed up b****ts, counted v**es 3 or 4 times, and had millions of dead people fraudulently v**e for that corrupt, deceitful, criminal Bribum. Slo Joe's actual numbers are around 30 million total v**es. Trump smashed all records for total v**es and all of his were legal. It now appears Slo Joe is wearing an ankle monitor to monitor him for his felonies in trying to steal an e******n.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

I’m not sure if your numbers are correct but I listened to the hearings. There was so much fraud it can’t be hidden. I do know this e******n was s****n from the president. Just like Hillary, Biden could have won the popular v**e, due to California. However; the fraud in Michigan,Nevada, and Wisconsin, and Georgia definitely cost Trump the e*******l v**e. Hence, the e******n.