dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

Pennsylvania Bombshell: Biden 99.4% v. Trump 0.6%
Stunning testimony that the media has dutifully ignored.
Paul Kengor by PAUL KENGOR
November 28, 2020, 12:41 PM
Ret. Col. Phil Waldren testifying at hearings on Nov. 25 (YouTube screenshot)🔊 Listen to this article

There are landslides and then there are landslides. There are lopsided v**es and then there are lopsided v**es. There are egregious examples of v**e manipulation and then there are really egregious examples of v**e manipulation. What surfaced during hearings in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, on November 25, 2020, may set the standard for e*******l outrageousness. An expert testifying to the Pennsylvania Senate f**gged a batch of b****ts that recorded some 570,000 v**es for Joe Biden and only 3,200 for Donald Trump.

Yes, you read that correctly. That would equate to Joe Biden bagging 99.4 percent of that enormous chunk of v**es. That one batch alone would have flipped the state to Biden.

This bombshell was dropped last Wednesday at the Wyndham Hotel in Gettysburg. The November 25 hearings, which began at 12:30 p.m. and ran for nearly four hours, were convened at the request of Sen. Doug Mastriano (R-Adams, Cumberland, Franklin, and York counties). It was sponsored by the Senate Majority Policy Committee, chaired by Sen. David Argall (R-Berks/Schuylk**l). Mastriano has called what happened “unacceptable,” and has called for the resignation of Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar.

This particular gem was provided by Ret. Col. Phil Waldren, a former combat officer with a background in Army information and electronic warfare. Waldren, who testified along with Rudy Giuliani’s team, brought to the hearing his considerable expertise in analysis of e******n-data fraud. After Waldren presented his material, the chair opened the floor for questions. Rudy Giuliani went first, asking Waldren to clarify what his analytics team means when they talk about “spike anomalies” in v****g patterns. These, as Waldren defines them, are “events where a numerical amount of v**es are processed in a time period that is not feasible or mechanically possible under normal circumstances.” Waldren showed a chart with a shocking example of an apparent massive dump of v**es for Joe Biden. Giuliani pressed Waldren for clarification regarding this unbelievable “Biden injection of v**es.” Here’s the exchange:

Waldren: At the very beginning of the chart, where there’s a circle that says “On E******n Day,” what that indicates is there’s a spike in loaded v**es. 337,000-plus-or-minus-some v**es that were added in there in one big batch. So that was an anomaly in the reporting. Normally you would expect to see a smooth curve going up, not any big spikes, that’s kind of what Greg was talking about, the anomalies of loading and uploading those v**es. So that big spike that occurs there is a prime indicator of fraudulent v****g.

Giuliani: And that’s [a total of] 604,000 v**es in 90 minutes, is that right?

Waldren: Correct, this is [shows chart] 337,000 v**es in that period of time.

Giuliani: And when you look at this entire curve, with all these spikes, can you calculate how much of a v**e that accounted for for Biden, and how much for Trump?

Waldren: Close to 600,000. I think our figures were about 570-some-odd-thousand that all those spikes represent overtime.

Giuliani: For Biden?

Waldren: Correct.

Giuliani: And how much for Trump?

Waldren: I think it was a little over 3,200.

That’s roughly 570,000 v**es for Biden and 3,200 for Trump. Biden scooped up this enormous batch by 99.4 percent. Incredible. Impossible. Scandalous.

When Waldren said this, the audience in the room gasped in shock. (To watch the exchange, and the entire hearing, click here. This exchange begins at 1:28:00.)

If what Waldren alleges here is true, then this would constitute one of the most insidious examples of documented v***r f***d in the history of American p**********l politics. This one spike alone would have erased Donald Trump’s 600,000-v**e lead over Joe Biden late Tuesday night, November 3. Biden has reportedly won Pennsylvania by about 70,000 v**es. This one swing would have done it. If this is true, then this episode alone might well constitute a smoking gun affirming a f********t e******n in Pennsylvania.

And yet, this e*******l bombshell has been completely ignored by the mainstream press. The only national sources that I could find reporting it were RealClearPolitics, Breitbart, and Greg Kelly of Newsmax TV. The video link that I’ve provided is courtesy of Right Side Broadcasting Network, a conservative source, filling a gap vacated by shameless mainstream “news” sources, which avoided the hearing like the plague.

I ask: Is this accurate? What happened here? Who or what could have flipped v**es like this? Who was responsible? How does this occur? Is this real? Does this not have the potential to remove Pennsylvania from Joe Biden’s column? At the least, should it make the Pennsylvania v**e uncertifiable for either Biden or Trump?

This was just one of many striking claims by Waldren and others throughout the nearly four hours of hearings. Another stunner, according to Waldren (see the 1:32:00 mark), is that a total of 1,823,148 mail-in b****ts were sent out by the Commonwealth, and yet 2,589,242 mail-in b****ts were counted in the final v**e tally for the state. Thus, there are allegedly some 766,000 mail-in b****ts unaccounted for. Rudy Giuliani observes that these 766,000 b****ts “appeared from nowhere.” Neither the Pennsylvania secretary of state nor governor addressed this alleged massive discrepancy. (As I write, the website of the Pennsylvania secretary of state’s office has information posted that disputes these numbers. Presumably, Waldren would say that this data was changed.)

Trump’s critics will want to dismiss the hearings as a partisan spectacle hosted by Pennsylvania Republican legislators. You can’t do that. A real journalist would see enough here to at least merit making some phone calls or sending a few emails. It’s not rocket science, press boys and girls. Do your jobs!

For the record, likewise egregious v**er spikes have reportedly occurred in Michigan, Georgia, and Wisconsin. One analysis has targeted these four incidents of “v**er updates”:

1. An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 v**es for Joe Biden and 5,968 v**es for Donald Trump

2. An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 v**es for Joe Biden and 25,163 v**es for Donald Trump

3. A v**e update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 v**es for Joe Biden and 29,115 v**es for Donald Trump

4. An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 v**es for Joe Biden and 4,718 v**es for Donald Trump

Likewise, these incidents could have flipped the respective state into Joe Biden’s win column. I could go on and on. See the affidavit of Russell Ramsland of Allied Security Systems detailing the numerous instances of “physical improbabilities” in the v****g tabulations (and e******n results) in Michigan. If your mind and heart is open, you can’t but be shocked by this.

But back to Pennsylvania, which is my focus here.

Could some reporter at some mainstream media outlet — one with a modicum of journalistic integrity and decency — pause to take some time to try to determine if these claims are accurate? Could just one “journalist” with access to Joe Biden ask for his reaction? How long would it take for Donald Trump to be grilled by a pack of ravenous reporters if Joe Biden had been potentially victimized like this?

And given that the media will not give these claims a hearing, could the U.S. Senate give them a hearing? There’s enough here that demands investigation.

Whether you like Donald Trump or not, whether you v**ed for him or not, this should concern every American. If this were Joe Biden being victimized, I would likewise protest. The media sure as heck would. This is not right.

EL Loc: Massachusetts

They should do this whole thing over again.

woodguru

Does this make any sense to you...if it does it's why the right is so screwed up.

"An expert..." What expert, who, and what is he an expert of...?
...f**gged a batch of b****ts...570,000 to 3200...really, do you know how big a batch of b****ts that is? This batch was where, who had counted it, how many boxes of b****ts was this?

That sounds so ridiculous it obviously came from the rhetorical magical things that the right just accepts as facts, so they think courts including the supreme court should too. They seem to think that that right there should be all GOP legislators need to call e******ns for trump, no evidence, nothing to substantiate that claim, just the word of an expert.

This goes along with the other ridiculous things that come right out of trump's empty headed mouth...
...a bunch of b****ts for trump found under rocks
...huge dumps of b****ts, okay, dumped where, and why isn't there any proof?
...magical machines that switched v**es, so why doesn't recounts not match?

which frankly all sounds too utterly ridiculous to repeat, but here's your president doing just that. This is truly embarrassing garbage coming from the right...embarrassing because how can people be so ignorant as to not have their BS meters pegged?

woodguru

You can in four more years

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

Debunked already. Catch up!

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

Durp Boy!

Grugore

Debunked? By whom?

Jlw Loc: Wisconsin

By the left

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

feature length Emmy nominated documentary: Hacking Democracy

The Hack. From the documentary, this video records an alarming anomaly in v**er machine coding with memory cards. This test was run by the e******n board in Leon County, Florida and was verified by computer scientists at UC Berkeley.

The v****g machine was chosen by a random draw of serial numbers and was run through its self test analysis, returning a print out showing zero v**es. The test involved 8 b****ts with one yes or no question. E******n board employees each marked one b****t.

They marked 2 YES, and 6 NO. Following the count, the machine printed out the tally - 7 YES, 1 NO. A nearly complete reversal.

On December 6, 2019, Senators Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar, Ron Wyden, and Rep. Mark Pocan sounded the alarm about the vulnerabilities of v****g machines. The four of them filed a formal complaint with all 3 v**er systems companies. I wonder why.

Here is a key paragraph from a rather long and detailed complaint:

In 2018 alone “v**ers in South Carolina were reporting machines that switched their v**es after they’d inputted them, scanners were rejecting paper b****ts in Missouri, and busted machines were causing long lines in Indiana.” In addition, researchers recently uncovered previously undisclosed vulnerabilities in “nearly three dozen backend e******n systems in 10 states.” And, just this year, after the Democratic candidate’s electronic tally showed he received an improbable 164 v**es out of 55,000 cast in a Pennsylvania state judicial e******n in 2019, the county’s Republican Chairwoman said,”nothing went right on E******n Day. Everything went wrong. That’s a problem.” These problems threaten the integrity of our e******ns and demonstrate the importance of e******n systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.

Smedley_buzkill

The expert you are questioning is a retired Army intelligence officer with a background in cyber security and hacking. Tell us, how much do YOU know about the subject, and what are YOUR bona fides?

Jlw Loc: Wisconsin

Well he graduated from the second grade

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

Far better than you?

Wonttakeitanymore

Do u read with comprehension anything but f**e news? Oh I forgot ur a zombie

SSDD

Even though I am certain you are correct, please post a link.

EL Loc: Massachusetts

That's a whole lot better than college these days.