One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Why would you rely on a test that had a "False Positive" Rate of 97%
Dec 1, 2020 06:08:40   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
The following is from the article entitled "Groundhog Day - C***D & "The Science" which I hope you will read (link at end). It mainly focuses on the Bull S**t notion that our medical science and political decision making is actually based upon the "Science". Far from it. Read the article and make up you own mind, but in the meantime, by all means "fool yourself into thinking that your RT-PCR test" is an accurate determinant whether you have the v***s.

[The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for C***d at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”]

Oh, and just in case you are not aware of this, the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35. https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/groundhog-day-c***d-science

Reply
Dec 1, 2020 07:13:02   #
zombinis3 Loc: Southwest
 
ACP45 wrote:
The following is from the article entitled "Groundhog Day - C***D & "The Science" which I hope you will read (link at end). It mainly focuses on the Bull S**t notion that our medical science and political decision making is actually based upon the "Science". Far from it. Read the article and make up you own mind, but in the meantime, by all means "fool yourself into thinking that your RT-PCR test" is an accurate determinant whether you have the v***s.

[The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for C***d at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”]

Oh, and just in case you are not aware of this, the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35. https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/groundhog-day-c***d-science
The following is from the article entitled b &quo... (show quote)


You're right about lot of tests have an error percentage, but when you come into the hospital and present with unable to breath , high temperature and it is proven something contagious is present it doesn't matter what you call it or how the determination is made your sick. You didn't follow the guidelines you should have been taught when you were younger. I was always taught to cover my mouth when I sneeze or cough wipe or wash my hands before I touch anything and take precautions when you are around people when the flu , cold or any sickness is present .

Reply
Dec 1, 2020 08:23:11   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
ACP45 wrote:
The following is from the article entitled "Groundhog Day - C***D & "The Science" which I hope you will read (link at end). It mainly focuses on the Bull S**t notion that our medical science and political decision making is actually based upon the "Science". Far from it. Read the article and make up you own mind, but in the meantime, by all means "fool yourself into thinking that your RT-PCR test" is an accurate determinant whether you have the v***s.

[The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for C***d at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”]

Oh, and just in case you are not aware of this, the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35. https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/groundhog-day-c***d-science
The following is from the article entitled b &quo... (show quote)


A more accurate test will keep people from dying.

Reply
 
 
Dec 1, 2020 08:32:40   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
zombinis3 wrote:
You're right about lot of tests have an error percentage, but when you come into the hospital and present with unable to breath , high temperature and it is proven something contagious is present it doesn't matter what you call it or how the determination is made your sick. You didn't follow the guidelines you should have been taught when you were younger. I was always taught to cover my mouth when I sneeze or cough wipe or wash my hands before I touch anything and take precautions when you are around people when the flu , cold or any sickness is present .
You're right about lot of tests have an error perc... (show quote)


I am making a general assumption that people have been getting sick with symptoms like fever and difficulty breathing since mankind took up residence on this planet. Since I haven't been around that long, I state it as an assumption. Does that justify societal lockdowns, mask wearing requirements, travel restrictions, closing of businesses causing untold economic harm, prohibition of going to church while allowing shopping in big box stores, and all sorts of other restrictions in the name of "science". Is this truly a p******c or psy op by the global elite who are anxious to usher in the "Reset" that they have become openly pronouncing?

Reply
Dec 1, 2020 08:33:48   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
lpnmajor wrote:
A more accurate test will keep people from dying.


Yes, I see. A more accurate test will stop people from dying. Good one!

Reply
Dec 1, 2020 11:40:09   #
manning5 Loc: Richmond, VA
 
ACP45 wrote:
The following is from the article entitled "Groundhog Day - C***D & "The Science" which I hope you will read (link at end). It mainly focuses on the Bull S**t notion that our medical science and political decision making is actually based upon the "Science". Far from it. Read the article and make up you own mind, but in the meantime, by all means "fool yourself into thinking that your RT-PCR test" is an accurate determinant whether you have the v***s.

[The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for C***d at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”]

Oh, and just in case you are not aware of this, the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35. https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/groundhog-day-c***d-science
The following is from the article entitled b &quo... (show quote)


=================re==========
So the spike is largely false, and the only sure way to be diagnosed is to present the full range of symptoms! What a con job!

Reply
Dec 3, 2020 07:47:26   #
zombinis3 Loc: Southwest
 
ACP45 wrote:
I am making a general assumption that people have been getting sick with symptoms like fever and difficulty breathing since mankind took up residence on this planet. Since I haven't been around that long, I state it as an assumption. Does that justify societal lockdowns, mask wearing requirements, travel restrictions, closing of businesses causing untold economic harm, prohibition of going to church while allowing shopping in big box stores, and all sorts of other restrictions in the name of "science". Is this truly a p******c or psy op by the global elite who are anxious to usher in the "Reset" that they have become openly pronouncing?
I am making a general assumption that people have ... (show quote)


Nope it doesn't not at least an extension of the closures the first two months was a given or rat her expected because of the known contagious property of the sickness that was acceptable. But the continued closure not so , but a slower opening would not have hurt. As long as the proper followup precautions were put into force. Unfortunately too many were concerned with their personal privacy. Along with the requirement to wear a mask. For every view you can find an a opinon to support it, not necessarily right but it is there. The tracing of the sickness is needed to control the spread. Also following the suggestions made by the government which mirror what you were taught as a child could also have helped. As for the reset it is always in the wings whenever something major causes an upset of the system. Right now there are to many conflicts in reporting which has caused chaos. That is when the possible reset can take place. Call it being a sheeple if you want , but if being one to a degree can keep the chaos down it may help.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.