Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Too little... Too late...
C***d is way overrated canuckus whether you want to believe it or not.
Johns Hopkins Study Saying C****-** Has 'Relatively No Effect on Deaths' in U.S. Deleted After PublicationMatt Margolis ~ November 27, 2020Conventional wisdom is that C****-** has caused thousands of deaths in the United States and nearly 1.5 million worldwide. This perception was directly challenged by a study published by Johns Hopkins University on November 22 that critically analyzed the impact that C****-** had on U.S. deaths.
The analysis revealed that the impact of C****-** on deaths in the United States can be fully understood by comparing it to the number of total deaths in the country. According to the study:
• In contrast to most people’s assumptions.
• The number of deaths by C****-** is not alarming.
• In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.
Wait, what?
Really?
That’s what it says!
And, it should come as no surprise that the study was deleted within days.
So, how exactly did the study conclude that C****-** has had “relatively no effect on deaths?”
Here’s how the study made this determination:
• After retrieving data on the CDC website.
• A graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September was compiled.
• Which included the period from before C****-** was detected in the U.S.
• To after infection rates soared.
• Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after C****-**.
• Since C****-** mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups.
• However, this increase was not seen from the CDC data.
• In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remained relatively the same.
According to the study the reason we have a higher number of reported C****-** deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. olde individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals. The analysis found that the range of deaths amongst the older population has remained within the range of past years.
So, if C****-** has actually had no significant impact on U.S. deaths, why does it not appear that way?
To answer that question, focus was shifted to the deaths per causes ranging from 2014 to 2020.
There was a sudden increase in deaths in 2020 due to C****-**. This is no surprise because C****-** emerged in the U.S. in early 2020. And thus C****-**-related deaths increased drastically afterward.
Analysis of deaths per cause in 2018 revealed that the pattern of seasonal increase in the total number of deaths is a result of the rise in deaths by all causes with the top three being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia. This is true every year. Every year in the U.S. when we observe the seasonal ups and downs we have an increase of deaths due to all causes.
Here’s where things get interesting.
When the 2020 data during that seasonal period was looked at C****-**-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers something strange was noted. As the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018 was compared. Instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease.
Even more surprising, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes. The study found that “This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years.” In fact, “the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by C****-**.” This strongly suggests that the C****-** death toll in the United States is misleading and that deaths from other diseases are being categorized as C****-** deaths.
There have been reports of inflated C****-** deaths numbers for months. Patients who never tested positive for the disease had C****-** as their cause of death on their death certificates. In May, Jared Polis, the Democrat governor of Colorado, disputed official c****av***s death counts saying even those of the CDC were inflated as the result of including people who tested positive for the c****av***s but died of other causes. In July, a fatal motorcycle accident victim was listed as a C****-** death. And we’ve all heard more.
On November 26, Johns Hopkins University tweeted:
Though making clear the need for further research, the article was being used to support false and dangerous inaccuracies about the impact of the p******c. We regret that this article may have contributed to the spread of misinformation about C****-**.
— JHU News-Letter (@JHUNewsLetter) November 26, 2020RRIIGGHHTT!