In a display of rich irony, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) accused the Supreme Court of playing politics with the novel c****av***s after it struck down his regulations that purported to severely limit the size of worship services in certain areas of the state.
Cuomo, whose regulations had previously withstood a series of legal challenges, responded to the Supreme Court's rebuke of his regulations by musing, "You have a different court, and I think that was the statement that the court was making. We know who [President Trump] appointed to the court. We know their ideology."
Of course, Cuomo's dismissal of the Supreme Court's decision largely ignores the fact that the Supreme Court struck down his regulations in a 5-4 ruling largely because it found that Cuomo's response to the novel c****av***s was based largely on politics, and not on science.
The court specifically noted that many non-religious activities have not been restricted (or have been differently restricted) by Gov. Cuomo's regulations for no apparent reason other than the fact that liberals enjoy to do them — and certainly not for any public health-related reason.
As the court's per curiam opinion noted, "It is hard to believe that admitting more than 10 people to a 1,000–seat church or 400-seat synagogue would create a more serious health risk than the many other activities that the State allows."
American Vet wrote:
In a display of rich irony, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) accused the Supreme Court of playing politics with the novel c****av***s after it struck down his regulations that purported to severely limit the size of worship services in certain areas of the state.
Cuomo, whose regulations had previously withstood a series of legal challenges, responded to the Supreme Court's rebuke of his regulations by musing, "You have a different court, and I think that was the statement that the court was making. We know who [President Trump] appointed to the court. We know their ideology."
Of course, Cuomo's dismissal of the Supreme Court's decision largely ignores the fact that the Supreme Court struck down his regulations in a 5-4 ruling largely because it found that Cuomo's response to the novel c****av***s was based largely on politics, and not on science.
The court specifically noted that many non-religious activities have not been restricted (or have been differently restricted) by Gov. Cuomo's regulations for no apparent reason other than the fact that liberals enjoy to do them — and certainly not for any public health-related reason.
As the court's per curiam opinion noted, "It is hard to believe that admitting more than 10 people to a 1,000–seat church or 400-seat synagogue would create a more serious health risk than the many other activities that the State allows."
In a display of rich irony, New York Gov. Andrew C... (
show quote)
He also dismissed the ruling saying it was irrelevant since the district involved was no longer a threat or risk..
The i***t fails to understand while the district is no longer involved the
Supreme Court of United States ruling will follow in other jurisdictions as well..
lindajoy wrote:
He also dismissed the ruling saying it was irrelevant since the district involved was no longer a threat or risk..
The i***t fails to understand while the district is no longer involved the
Supreme Court of United States ruling will follow in other jurisdictions as well..
I think that he also said that he would not follow the ruling
Jlw wrote:
I think that he also said that he would not follow the ruling
He did Jlw... Pompous ass that he is!! How many died in nursing home from his “ brilliant” house C***d patients with them???
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.