One Political Plaza - Home of politics
The Federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC) & 2 private testing certifiction labs
Nov 21, 2020 06:33:23   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
Quite an interesting read. Here are a few of the highlights:

1 "the main certification agency in the United States, the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC), maintains an unexpectedly small staff, and one of its chief employees is a former executive of Dominion Voting Systems."

2. "it appears the bulk—if not all—of the testing of the election equipment is conducted by only two companies, Pro V&V and SLI Compliance."

3. "For one of the two companies used, Pro V&V, the EAC fails to publicly provide the accreditation certificate on its website, instead linking to a page giving a “page could not be found” warning.....It is unclear if the company’s accreditation is truly expired or if the fault lies with the EAC website."

4. "Despite being responsible for the testing and data used in the certification of entire voting systems, including that of Dominion’s recently certified “Democracy Suite (D-Suite) 5.5-C Voting System (Pro V&V Test Report June 16, 2020), while simultaneously providing system testing across the nation, Pro V&V has only a single office listed, located in a business suite, that is supported by a surprisingly crude and sparse website.

The website description of Pro V&V’s facilities omits the “Suite” portion of their address while claiming their “office and laboratory layouts allow ample space for test equipment, software, and hardware used in the testing process.” Their site also claims they have the option of expanding into additional space within the same complex."

5. "Although Judge Totenberg ruled to allow the Dominion System to be used in the Nov 3, 2020 election, she voiced real concerns, stating the “risks are neither hypothetical nor remote.”

She also noted that Jack Cobb, the director of Pro V&V, “plainly indicated that he actually claims no specialized knowledge or background in cybersecurity engineering and did not himself perform any security risk analysis of the BMD [Ballot Marking Device] system.” Instead, “State Defendants relied on Dr. Coomer’s (Dr. Eric Coomer, director of Product Strategy and Security for Dominion Voting Systems )testimony, to address—based on his professional experience—some of the significant cybersecurity issues raised by Plaintiffs.”


https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-small-world-of-voting-machine-certification_3587972.html?utm_source=morningbrief&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb-2020-11-21

| Reply
Nov 21, 2020 06:41:31   #
byronglimish Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
ACP45 wrote:
Quite an interesting read. Here are a few of the highlights:

1 "the main certification agency in the United States, the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC), maintains an unexpectedly small staff, and one of its chief employees is a former executive of Dominion Voting Systems."

2. "it appears the bulk—if not all—of the testing of the election equipment is conducted by only two companies, Pro V&V and SLI Compliance."

3. "For one of the two companies used, Pro V&V, the EAC fails to publicly provide the accreditation certificate on its website, instead linking to a page giving a “page could not be found” warning.....It is unclear if the company’s accreditation is truly expired or if the fault lies with the EAC website."

4. "Despite being responsible for the testing and data used in the certification of entire voting systems, including that of Dominion’s recently certified “Democracy Suite (D-Suite) 5.5-C Voting System (Pro V&V Test Report June 16, 2020), while simultaneously providing system testing across the nation, Pro V&V has only a single office listed, located in a business suite, that is supported by a surprisingly crude and sparse website.

The website description of Pro V&V’s facilities omits the “Suite” portion of their address while claiming their “office and laboratory layouts allow ample space for test equipment, software, and hardware used in the testing process.” Their site also claims they have the option of expanding into additional space within the same complex."

5. "Although Judge Totenberg ruled to allow the Dominion System to be used in the Nov 3, 2020 election, she voiced real concerns, stating the “risks are neither hypothetical nor remote.”

She also noted that Jack Cobb, the director of Pro V&V, “plainly indicated that he actually claims no specialized knowledge or background in cybersecurity engineering and did not himself perform any security risk analysis of the BMD [Ballot Marking Device] system.” Instead, “State Defendants relied on Dr. Coomer’s (Dr. Eric Coomer, director of Product Strategy and Security for Dominion Voting Systems )testimony, to address—based on his professional experience—some of the significant cybersecurity issues raised by Plaintiffs.”


https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-small-world-of-voting-machine-certification_3587972.html?utm_source=morningbrief&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb-2020-11-21
Quite an interesting read. Here are a few of the h... (show quote)



Even if the election doesn't get righted, maybe Dominion and these other communist outfits will be history...who knows?

| Reply
Nov 21, 2020 07:12:47   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
byronglimish wrote:
Even if the election doesn't get righted, maybe Dominion and these other communist outfits will be history...who knows?


Under a Biden/Harris presidency would you really expect a reform on a system that got him elected in the first place?

Just look at the residual effect of the Clinton/Bush/Obama staffing of the FBI and Intelligence communities even under the Trump administration. Even after all those firings and resignations, there are still problems in those agencies.

Half the American public still believe the polls and the MSM mantra that there has been no evidence of election fraud. They really believe it, because they want to believe it. Their hatred of Trump goes so deep that they cast a blind eye to anything and everything Trump related, because the end justifies the means!

| Reply
 
 
Nov 21, 2020 07:27:36   #
Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial
 
ACP45 wrote:
Under a Biden/Harris presidency would you really expect a reform on a system that got him elected in the first place?

Just look at the residual effect of the Clinton/Bush/Obama staffing of the FBI and Intelligence communities even under the Trump administration. Even after all those firings and resignations, there are still problems in those agencies.

Half the American public still believe the polls and the MSM mantra that there has been no evidence of election fraud. They really believe it, because they want to believe it. Their hatred of Trump goes so deep that they cast a blind eye to anything and everything Trump related, because the end justifies the means!
Under a Biden/Harris presidency would you really e... (show quote)


Boy, trump was really dumb not to figure this out before hand. Talk about stupid.

| Reply
Nov 21, 2020 08:23:55   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
ACP45 wrote:
Quite an interesting read. Here are a few of the highlights:

1 "the main certification agency in the United States, the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC), maintains an unexpectedly small staff, and one of its chief employees is a former executive of Dominion Voting Systems."

2. "it appears the bulk—if not all—of the testing of the election equipment is conducted by only two companies, Pro V&V and SLI Compliance."

3. "For one of the two companies used, Pro V&V, the EAC fails to publicly provide the accreditation certificate on its website, instead linking to a page giving a “page could not be found” warning.....It is unclear if the company’s accreditation is truly expired or if the fault lies with the EAC website."

4. "Despite being responsible for the testing and data used in the certification of entire voting systems, including that of Dominion’s recently certified “Democracy Suite (D-Suite) 5.5-C Voting System (Pro V&V Test Report June 16, 2020), while simultaneously providing system testing across the nation, Pro V&V has only a single office listed, located in a business suite, that is supported by a surprisingly crude and sparse website.

The website description of Pro V&V’s facilities omits the “Suite” portion of their address while claiming their “office and laboratory layouts allow ample space for test equipment, software, and hardware used in the testing process.” Their site also claims they have the option of expanding into additional space within the same complex."

5. "Although Judge Totenberg ruled to allow the Dominion System to be used in the Nov 3, 2020 election, she voiced real concerns, stating the “risks are neither hypothetical nor remote.”

She also noted that Jack Cobb, the director of Pro V&V, “plainly indicated that he actually claims no specialized knowledge or background in cybersecurity engineering and did not himself perform any security risk analysis of the BMD [Ballot Marking Device] system.” Instead, “State Defendants relied on Dr. Coomer’s (Dr. Eric Coomer, director of Product Strategy and Security for Dominion Voting Systems )testimony, to address—based on his professional experience—some of the significant cybersecurity issues raised by Plaintiffs.”


https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-small-world-of-voting-machine-certification_3587972.html?utm_source=morningbrief&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb-2020-11-21
Quite an interesting read. Here are a few of the h... (show quote)


The main certification agency.........................are the sec. of State of the 50 States in the union. The federal government has NO hand in national election security, integrity or certification.

| Reply
Nov 21, 2020 08:36:04   #
byronglimish Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
ACP45 wrote:
Under a Biden/Harris presidency would you really expect a reform on a system that got him elected in the first place?

Just look at the residual effect of the Clinton/Bush/Obama staffing of the FBI and Intelligence communities even under the Trump administration. Even after all those firings and resignations, there are still problems in those agencies.

Half the American public still believe the polls and the MSM mantra that there has been no evidence of election fraud. They really believe it, because they want to believe it. Their hatred of Trump goes so deep that they cast a blind eye to anything and everything Trump related, because the end justifies the means!
Under a Biden/Harris presidency would you really e... (show quote)


.it might be futile optimization.

| Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2020 IDF International Technologies, Inc.