OPP Poll.... $15.00/hr (Page 4): It's not over , it's hadn't been certified yet!! EC hasn't called it yet!!! You guys been whining and crying for the last 4 years,LOSERS!!!! :sm16:...

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Wolfman888 wrote:

Get over it LOSER !

The e******n has been over for a week !

Keep whining and crying tho it suits you.

It's not over , it's hadn't been certified yet!! EC hasn't called it yet!!! You guys been whining and crying for the last 4 years,LOSERS!!!!

straightUp Loc: California

proud republican wrote:

Biden wants to raise minimum wage to 15.00/hr!! Sounds good , right?? But can small businesses afford to keep all their employees and still pay them $15.00???

Who cares? If a small business can't afford to pay their employees a living wage, then let them fail! A business doesn't exist without a demand for products or services and as long as there is a demand, someone else with better management sk**ls can always start a new business, pay their employees $15/hr and fill that need.

Reagan called it "creative destruction"... tearing down the old business to make room for the new and improved business.

straightUp Loc: California

proud republican wrote:

It's not over , it's hadn't been certified yet!! EC hasn't called it yet!!! You guys been whining and crying for the last 4 years,LOSERS!!!!

There are those among the majority of Americans that v**ed for Clinton in 2016 who have expressed concerns about the fairness of the EC. That's not whining and crying.

Today, there are those among the minority of Americans that v**ed for Trump in 2020 that are screaming about massive v***r f***d that doesn't appear to exist and threatening violence and civil war if Biden wins. THAT is whining and crying.

The EC stands at 306 v**es for Biden and 232 for Trump with an estimated 97% of all v**es accounted for. So unless Jesus Himself comes down to interfere the EC will certify a win for Biden.

I think you need to get over it.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

DASHY wrote:

When the Biden Administration takes control in January we can look forward to C***d relief for struggling Americans, reversal of Trump's damaging Corporate tax cuts, building on and improving the ACA, and creating millions of good paying jobs by improving the US infrastructure. I feel better already.

The Biden-Sanders-Kamalaho solution to the C***d crisis is a nationwide mask mandate and lock downs which will eliminate the need to raise anyone's wages.

This is a Catch-22 since their intention is to "to support state and local governments, which are suffering severe budget shortfalls due to declines in tax revenues while being asked to shoulder the burden of C***D-related services and rising unemployment. State and local budget cuts t***slate quickly into lost jobs in education, health care, and social services—all fields where we need to be increasing employment to meet the needs of the American people. Democrats will extend significant aid to state and local governments to address these budget shortfalls, and condition state and federal aid on maintaining and expanding public-sector employment, including provisions to protect workers’ rights."

IOW, the Biden-Sanders-Kamalaho administration will force American taxpayers - those still paying them - to shoulder the burden for millions in unemployment compensation and other Federal aid to local and state governments.

Tax Foundation: The Benefits of Cutting the Corporate Income Tax Rate
* One of the most significant provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is the permanently lower federal corporate income tax rate, which decreased from 35 percent to 21 percent.

* Prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the United States’ high statutory corporate tax rate stood out among rates worldwide. Among countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the U.S. combined corporate income tax rate was the highest. Now, post-tax reform, the rate is close to average.

* A corporate income tax rate closer to that of other nations will discourage profit shifting to lower-tax jurisdictions.

* New investment will increase the size of the capital stock, and productivity, output, wages, and employment will grow. The Tax Foundation Taxes and Growth model estimates that the total effect of the new tax law will be a 1.7 percent larger economy, leading to 1.5 percent higher wages, a 4.8 percent larger capital stock, and 339,000 additional full-time equivalent jobs in the long run.

* Economic evidence suggests that corporate income taxes are the most harmful type of tax and that workers bear a portion of the burden. Reducing the corporate income tax will benefit workers as new investments boost productivity and lead to wage growth.

* If lawmakers raised the corporate income tax rate from 21 percent to 25 percent, we estimate the tax increase would shrink the long-run size of the economy by 0.87 percent, or $228 billion. This would reduce the capital stock by 2.11 percent, wages by 0.74 percent, and lead to 175,700 fewer full time equivalent jobs.

Obamacare is in trouble, a victim of its own complexity.

Enacted in 2010 as a 2,700 page bill, the law called for the creation of more than 150 new federal boards, commissions, panels and programs. It has spawned more than 20,000 additional pages of regulation so far—and that’s after only three years of an eight-year implementation schedule. Welcome to the future!

There’s a reason for this mind-numbing complexity: Obamacare is the boldest attempt at government central planning in American history. The law gives federal officials power over all major decisions in American health care: what kind of health plans, benefits and levels of coverage Americans must buy; what is permissible for insurers in terms of administrative costs, profit levels, or premiums; what’s acceptable as preventive care; what benefits business owners, religious organizations and charities must offer; how states must run their new, untested health insurance exchanges… the list goes on and on, including new mandates and hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes and fees—not to mention fines and penalties for noncompliance.

In the era of Obamacare, what you want in health care is irrelevant; you will get what government officials tell you that you must have. This is classic central planning. And history teaches us that central planning on this large a scale is doomed to fail.

Official Washington already is struggling with the economics of this monster. Last year, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Katherine Sebelius announced her department could not implement the long-term care component of Obamacare. Financially, she said, it was simply not workable. And just this month Sebelius announced that she was postponing a program designed to allow small businesses to offer more than one plan for their workers. Meanwhile, more than half the states have declined to set up a ‘health insurance exchange” under the burdensome terms and conditions of the law, leaving it to Washington to do it for them.

IOW, it is impossible to fix a train wreck.

Wolfman888

proud republican wrote:

It's not over , it's hadn't been certified yet!! EC hasn't called it yet!!! You guys been whining and crying for the last 4 years,LOSERS!!!!

Yuk, yuk !

You know that they will tho.

Even your Orange Leaders attorneys can't find enough to make

any fraud argument stick.

Course with Rudy on the stick now, anything could happen;

although none of it would be reality based.

Is that really the best you can come up with ?

Even Trump knows it's over if he put Rudy in charge.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Wolfman888 wrote:

Yuk, yuk !

You know that they will tho.

Even your Orange Leaders attorneys can't find enough to make

any fraud argument stick.

Course with Rudy on the stick now, anything could happen;

although none of it would be reality based.

Is that really the best you can come up with ?

Even Trump knows it's over if he put Rudy in charge.

Please craw back under your home rock ! !!!

Simple Sam Loc: USA

Wolfman888 wrote:

Yuk, yuk !

You know that they will tho.

Even your Orange Leaders attorneys can't find enough to make

any fraud argument stick.

Course with Rudy on the stick now, anything could happen;

although none of it would be reality based.

Is that really the best you can come up with ?

Even Trump knows it's over if he put Rudy in charge.

How many cases of fraud do you think is acceptable?

Wolfman888

Simple Sam wrote:

How many cases of fraud do you think is acceptable?

Umm, that would be one that would hold up in court.

Evidence you see, is important to the judicial system.

Not whining rants by your Orange President and his lackeys.

Wolfman888

proud republican wrote:

Please craw back under your home rock ! !!!

You're a hoot Proud.

All you did prior to the e******n was huckster for the con man in chief.

Now you're acting all offended that we're crowing that

your oligarchic narcisstic moron in chief is a LOSER !!

And that is how history will remember him and you.

Live with it; history will not be kind.

Simple Sam Loc: USA

Wolfman888 wrote:

Umm, that would be one that would hold up in court.

Evidence you see, is important to the judicial system.

Not whining rants by your Orange President and his lackeys.

What evidence would hold up in court? There are eyewitnesses and affidavits. Would that be sufficient? B****ts, once received, becomes a yes or no and reduced to numbers. Unless states provide copies of cast b****ts, they remain secret. States will not provide the data and courts will not order them to do so. That means this e******n will always be haunted and known as an illegitimate and overshadowed as fraudulent.

Now will you answer my question?

As for the rest of your comment, not worthy of comment.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Simple Sam wrote:

What evidence would hold up in court? There are e... (show quote)

DASHY

Blade_Runner wrote:

The Biden-Sanders-Kamalaho solution to the C***d crisis is a nationwide mask mandate and lock downs which will eliminate the need to raise anyone's wages.

This is a Catch-22 since their intention is to "to support state and local governments, which are suffering severe budget shortfalls due to declines in tax revenues while being asked to shoulder the burden of C***D-related services and rising unemployment. State and local budget cuts t***slate quickly into lost jobs in education, health care, and social services—all fields where we need to be increasing employment to meet the needs of the American people. Democrats will extend significant aid to state and local governments to address these budget shortfalls, and condition state and federal aid on maintaining and expanding public-sector employment, including provisions to protect workers’ rights."

IOW, the Biden-Sanders-Kamalaho administration will force American taxpayers - those still paying them - to shoulder the burden for millions in unemployment compensation and other Federal aid to local and state governments.

Tax Foundation: The Benefits of Cutting the Corporate Income Tax Rate
* One of the most significant provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is the permanently lower federal corporate income tax rate, which decreased from 35 percent to 21 percent.

* Prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the United States’ high statutory corporate tax rate stood out among rates worldwide. Among countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the U.S. combined corporate income tax rate was the highest. Now, post-tax reform, the rate is close to average.

* A corporate income tax rate closer to that of other nations will discourage profit shifting to lower-tax jurisdictions.

* New investment will increase the size of the capital stock, and productivity, output, wages, and employment will grow. The Tax Foundation Taxes and Growth model estimates that the total effect of the new tax law will be a 1.7 percent larger economy, leading to 1.5 percent higher wages, a 4.8 percent larger capital stock, and 339,000 additional full-time equivalent jobs in the long run.

* Economic evidence suggests that corporate income taxes are the most harmful type of tax and that workers bear a portion of the burden. Reducing the corporate income tax will benefit workers as new investments boost productivity and lead to wage growth.

* If lawmakers raised the corporate income tax rate from 21 percent to 25 percent, we estimate the tax increase would shrink the long-run size of the economy by 0.87 percent, or $228 billion. This would reduce the capital stock by 2.11 percent, wages by 0.74 percent, and lead to 175,700 fewer full time equivalent jobs.

Obamacare is in trouble, a victim of its own complexity.

Enacted in 2010 as a 2,700 page bill, the law called for the creation of more than 150 new federal boards, commissions, panels and programs. It has spawned more than 20,000 additional pages of regulation so far—and that’s after only three years of an eight-year implementation schedule. Welcome to the future!

There’s a reason for this mind-numbing complexity: Obamacare is the boldest attempt at government central planning in American history. The law gives federal officials power over all major decisions in American health care: what kind of health plans, benefits and levels of coverage Americans must buy; what is permissible for insurers in terms of administrative costs, profit levels, or premiums; what’s acceptable as preventive care; what benefits business owners, religious organizations and charities must offer; how states must run their new, untested health insurance exchanges… the list goes on and on, including new mandates and hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes and fees—not to mention fines and penalties for noncompliance.

In the era of Obamacare, what you want in health care is irrelevant; you will get what government officials tell you that you must have. This is classic central planning. And history teaches us that central planning on this large a scale is doomed to fail.

Official Washington already is struggling with the economics of this monster. Last year, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Katherine Sebelius announced her department could not implement the long-term care component of Obamacare. Financially, she said, it was simply not workable. And just this month Sebelius announced that she was postponing a program designed to allow small businesses to offer more than one plan for their workers. Meanwhile, more than half the states have declined to set up a ‘health insurance exchange” under the burdensome terms and conditions of the law, leaving it to Washington to do it for them.

IOW, it is impossible to fix a train wreck.

The Biden-Sanders-Kamalaho solution to the C***d c... (show quote)

Another load of crap from a beaten down Trumpster. The train wreck is ending on January 20. The new guy in town will attack the problems instead of sobbing about them.

DASHY

Simple Sam wrote:

What evidence would hold up in court? There are e... (show quote)

The judge decides what evidence will hold up in court. So far Trump's lawyers have nothing but lies and spam. Trump's court strategy is losing bigly. The only illegitimate thing about this e******n is Trump himself.

Simple Sam Loc: USA

DASHY wrote:

The judge decides what evidence will hold up in court. So far Trump's lawyers have nothing but lies and spam. Trump's court strategy is losing bigly. The only illegitimate thing about this e******n is Trump himself.

Now you see, that is a problem. Trump's lawyer filed suite (in PA) not for fraud deliberately committed by citizen(s), but rater error in law. Pretty damn stupid, but there is no way, without cooperation of the state, to prove any individual was not eligible to v**e. They went with the readily available and wart on the nose complaint. That is, a disproportionate number of democrat v**ers were given an opportunity to "cure" their b****ts giving the democrats an unfair advantage. The judge, James Crumlish, asked questions that focused on individual deliberate citizen fraud, and ruled based on those answers only. Smart judge who protected the democrats that put him on the bench. It would have helped to had a republican judge with more than 11 month tenure. But, at least in PA, the loss by the Trump team was not about evidence, but rather the grounds for relief.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

DASHY wrote:

Sounds like another regret from yet another Trumpster left without hope.

You assume too much, Dashy..