One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Democrats Want Absolute Control Over The Government
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Oct 28, 2020 21:24:59   #
tbutkovich
 
Just like: “you are what you eat” or “you get what you pay for.”

“You also endure the bad policy of who you v**e for!”

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 23:01:26   #
11Bravo
 
tbutkovich wrote:
We need a 20 million man match on Washington DC and March into the halls of Congress and extract the C*******ts from their offices and ship them to the Aleutian Islands and give them one pallet of food. Nothing More!

Either that or a simpler solution is to just v**e the bastards out of office!


V****g them out is the correct method to get them out but they've got a deep effective bench. After f**e #44 then hrc stepped in causing more dissent, now bozo biden/hoho harris have really reved it up. The fish rots from the head & Soros et al is the $$$ behind this. Neutralize his cartel, good start to a clean out of minor league players. The major players can't be had in DC so get them @ home where they feel safe. Burn'em Out!

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 23:04:03   #
F.D.R.
 
Milosia2 wrote:
And your side is not RepubliPIGs

Only F*****ts!
Trumpsky F*****ts.

But tell me when has minority rule worked out well in History ?


Would you care to enlighten us on exactly how a judge ruling on whether a law follows our constitution is bad?

Reply
 
 
Oct 29, 2020 07:12:02   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
tbutkovich wrote:
Just like: “you are what you eat” or “you get what you pay for.”

“You also endure the bad policy of who you v**e for!”


T***h!!!

Reply
Oct 29, 2020 07:14:05   #
Forkbassman Loc: Missouri
 
Hug wrote:
They are not Democrats. They are C*******t calling themselves Democrats.


True but sadly, millions will v**e for Biden. America had better wake up.

Reply
Oct 29, 2020 07:31:15   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
tbutkovich wrote:
Just like: “you are what you eat” or “you get what you pay for.”

“You also endure the bad policy of who you v**e for!”


Yup, that's why the American people are about to jettison this President.

Reply
Oct 29, 2020 08:04:46   #
Cuda2020
 
tbutkovich wrote:
Just like: “you are what you eat” or “you get what you pay for.”

“You also endure the bad policy of who you v**e for!”


True enough as we've all ENDURED the last four years of talking more about the actions and tweets from a usurper then the real issues we should be talking about and resolving.

Reply
 
 
Oct 29, 2020 11:48:52   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
 
tbutkovich wrote:
After Amy Coney Barrett was sworn in, they immediately came out publically declaring they are going to make changes to the judicial system.

They do not want the Supreme Court to base their decision on the constitution but rather on their political or radical preferences for change. As such, they have already declared they will “pack the court”. They are pulling out all the stops to control the outcome of all issues requiring resolution by the courts.

The Democrats want to have it their way and their plan on packing the courts is another ploy to achieve that goal!
After Amy Coney Barrett was sworn in, they immedia... (show quote)


It was the Republicans that stole two Justice se******ns from Obama, and the incoming President, Which looks like it should go to Biden. Paybacks are hell!

Reply
Oct 30, 2020 15:58:30   #
GmanTerry
 
Milosia2 wrote:
And your side is not RepubliPIGs

Only F*****ts!
Trumpsky F*****ts.

But tell me when has minority rule worked out well in History ?


It sure didn't work out well for America when we elected the first black President.

Semper Fi

Reply
Oct 30, 2020 18:44:46   #
11Bravo
 
We The People surely aren't going to elect the first red bone female VP either.

Reply
Oct 30, 2020 19:10:28   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
It was the Republicans that stole two Justice se******ns from Obama, and the incoming President, Which looks like it should go to Biden. Paybacks are hell!



The Republicans didn’t steal anything!!!
Twenty-nine times in history there has been an open Supreme Court vacancy in a p**********l e******n year, or a lame-duck session before the next p**********l inauguration... The president made a nomination in all twenty-nine cases!!! George Washington did it three times. John Adams did it. Thomas Jefferson did it. Abraham Lincoln did it. Ulysses S. Grant did it. Franklin D. Roosevelt did it. Dwight Eisenhower did it. Barack Obama, of course, did it. Twenty-two of the 44 men to hold the office faced this situation, and all twenty-two made the decision to send up a nomination, whether or not they had the v**es in the Senate!!! All of them, not just a few...

Trumps appointments is part of his job, like it or not..

The U.S. Constitution in only a few words. The “Appointments Clause” (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2) states that the President “shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ...Does not say can or might, but “shall appoint..”

Nineteen times between 1796 and 1968, presidents have sought to fill a Supreme Court vacancy in a p**********l-e******n year while their party controlled the Senate. Ten of those nominations came before the e******n; nine of the ten were successful...

The bottom line: If a president and the Senate agree on a Supreme Court nominee, timing has never stopped them. “By tradition,”only when the v**ers have elected a president and a Senate majority from different parties has the fact of a looming p**********l e******n mattered. When there is no dispute between the branches, there is no need to ask the v**ers to resolve one...
An e******n year alone is not the historical rule... The fact of ”divided government” was what connected concerns about an e******n-year nomination to historical practice...

The political reality behind the so-called “Biden rule” frequently invoked by McConnell and Grassley in 2016 is that the Senate in 1992 was held by Democrats, and by warning the first President Bush against an e******n-year nomination, Biden was asserting the partisan prerogatives of the Democratic Senate majority. In fact, Biden in his June 1992 speech on refusing to confirm any e******n-year Bush nominees leaned explicitly on the different standards applicable to divided government...

So what is different here?? Not a damn thing but cry baby democrats ...

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44235.pdf

https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/history-shows-how-scotus-nominations-play-out-in-e******n-years

Reply
 
 
Oct 30, 2020 19:13:18   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
GmanTerry wrote:
It sure didn't work out well for America when we elected the first black President.

Semper Fi


Throws that r****m issue right out the window doesn’t it.. “The Citizens “ of this country elected him...

Reply
Oct 30, 2020 19:38:40   #
moldyoldy
 
lindajoy wrote:
Throws that r****m issue right out the window doesn’t it.. “The Citizens “ of this country elected him...


The idea of minority presidents scared the r****ts so bad that they picked the worst possible person to represent them. He told them that they could come out publicly and flaunt their hatred of everyone not white.

Reply
Oct 30, 2020 19:41:48   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
moldyoldy wrote:
The idea of minority presidents scared the r****ts so bad that they picked the worst possible person to represent them. He told them that they could come out publicly and flaunt their hatred of everyone not white.

Nice spin...NOT!!!

Reply
Oct 30, 2020 21:57:11   #
Abel
 
lindajoy wrote:
The Republicans didn’t steal anything!!!
Twenty-nine times in history there has been an open Supreme Court vacancy in a p**********l e******n year, or a lame-duck session before the next p**********l inauguration... The president made a nomination in all twenty-nine cases!!! George Washington did it three times. John Adams did it. Thomas Jefferson did it. Abraham Lincoln did it. Ulysses S. Grant did it. Franklin D. Roosevelt did it. Dwight Eisenhower did it. Barack Obama, of course, did it. Twenty-two of the 44 men to hold the office faced this situation, and all twenty-two made the decision to send up a nomination, whether or not they had the v**es in the Senate!!! All of them, not just a few...

Trumps appointments is part of his job, like it or not..

The U.S. Constitution in only a few words. The “Appointments Clause” (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2) states that the President “shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ...Does not say can or might, but “shall appoint..”

Nineteen times between 1796 and 1968, presidents have sought to fill a Supreme Court vacancy in a p**********l-e******n year while their party controlled the Senate. Ten of those nominations came before the e******n; nine of the ten were successful...

The bottom line: If a president and the Senate agree on a Supreme Court nominee, timing has never stopped them. “By tradition,”only when the v**ers have elected a president and a Senate majority from different parties has the fact of a looming p**********l e******n mattered. When there is no dispute between the branches, there is no need to ask the v**ers to resolve one...
An e******n year alone is not the historical rule... The fact of ”divided government” was what connected concerns about an e******n-year nomination to historical practice...

The political reality behind the so-called “Biden rule” frequently invoked by McConnell and Grassley in 2016 is that the Senate in 1992 was held by Democrats, and by warning the first President Bush against an e******n-year nomination, Biden was asserting the partisan prerogatives of the Democratic Senate majority. In fact, Biden in his June 1992 speech on refusing to confirm any e******n-year Bush nominees leaned explicitly on the different standards applicable to divided government...

So what is different here?? Not a damn thing but cry baby democrats ...

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44235.pdf

https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/history-shows-how-scotus-nominations-play-out-in-e******n-years
The Republicans didn’t steal anything!!! br Twenty... (show quote)


Right on the money, Lindajoy! Nice to see someone who knows the difference between will, shall, may!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.