One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Democrats Want Absolute Control Over The Government
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Oct 28, 2020 09:20:18   #
Radiance3
 
tbutkovich wrote:
After Amy Coney Barrett was sworn in, they immediately came out publically declaring they are going to make changes to the judicial system.

They do not want the Supreme Court to base their decision on the constitution but rather on their political or radical preferences for change. As such, they have already declared they will “pack the court”. They are pulling out all the stops to control the outcome of all issues requiring resolution by the courts.

The Democrats want to have it their way and their plan on packing the courts is another ploy to achieve that goal!
After Amy Coney Barrett was sworn in, they immedia... (show quote)

================
Radical DIM'S goal is total control of the 3 branches of government. Until eventually they are able to completely remove the replace the constitution, and create with their own Marxist -c*******t style of governance. Powers centered to few of elites with the total powers to the Marxist dictator. The American people are all stripped out of power and freedom under control.

Once the radical DIMS take control of the Senate and the Executive branch, they'll try to execute this agenda of Court Packing. Perhaps to 13 up to 15 Jurists. Therefore they could add 6 more possible seats to the bench.

Once they have total control of the Immigration, with open borders, the radical DIMS will start providing citizenship to 22 million i*****l a***ns as already planned. This will give them a lifetime power, and eradicate the Republican Party who will never win a seat because majority of the v****g population are democrats. So forget about e******n. That is just a window dressing, like what is happening in the c*******t countries.

Once Joe Biden and Kamala wins, starts this process, Another desperate desires of taking power by the democrats are to cover-up all the criminal activities they have done against the political opponent . The victims, Donald Trump and his team's rights are rift-off, and all of that of the American people.

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 10:10:58   #
FallenOak Loc: St George Utah
 
Milosia2 wrote:
And your side is not RepubliPIGs

Only F*****ts!
Trumpsky F*****ts.

But tell me when has minority rule worked out well in History ?


Calling people names is really a good way to win an argument. Dems call names. Reps are so sweet they put up with it and forgive. When the Dems win and the Reps forgive we WILL get a dictatorship and then only the Dictator wins, we all lose.

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 10:11:58   #
FallenOak Loc: St George Utah
 
Kevyn wrote:
The end to partisan gerrymandering would end safe districts and see too it that more centrist candidates were elected to more accurately represent people’s will. Short of that which will take a generation the Democrats have a duty to balance the courts.


Look it up in history, Dems gave us gerrymandering.

Reply
 
 
Oct 28, 2020 11:24:39   #
maureenthannon
 
tbutk, You're not surprised, are you? The only thing that surprises me is how many people are falling for their s**ms!

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 11:32:52   #
moldyoldy
 
FallenOak wrote:
Look it up in history, Dems gave us gerrymandering.



Printed in March 1812, this political cartoon was drawn in reaction to the newly drawn state senate e******n district of South Essex created by the Massachusetts legislature to favor the Democratic-Republican Party candidates of Governor Elbridge Gerry over the Federalists. The caricature satirizes the bizarre shape of a district in Essex County, Massachusetts, as a d**gon-like "monster". Federalist newspaper editors and others at the time likened the district shape to a salamander, and the word gerrymander was a portmanteau of that word and Governor Gerry's last name.

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 15:15:36   #
Ack wright
 
we really should rise up as a people and take our country back. But alas, we are all caught up posting on fb,,tw,,ig and the like to do anything about it. It would be nice to see some real balls instead of a bunch of pussies arguing about it online. I don't want blood in the streets but true action does not require any. Go with God my little twitterlings and remember the only way to heaven is through our Lord Jesus.

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 16:54:36   #
Abel
 
tbutkovich wrote:
After Amy Coney Barrett was sworn in, they immediately came out publically declaring they are going to make changes to the judicial system.

They do not want the Supreme Court to base their decision on the constitution but rather on their political or radical preferences for change. As such, they have already declared they will “pack the court”. They are pulling out all the stops to control the outcome of all issues requiring resolution by the courts.

The Democrats want to have it their way and their plan on packing the courts is another ploy to achieve that goal!
After Amy Coney Barrett was sworn in, they immedia... (show quote)


Absolutely correct! I wonder who they want to put in as the potentate, Bill Gates, George Soros, or some AI Bot with an on-off, change, or delete switch controlled by some progressive meathead.

Reply
 
 
Oct 28, 2020 19:01:11   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
tbutkovich wrote:
After Amy Coney Barrett was sworn in, they immediately came out publically declaring they are going to make changes to the judicial system.

They do not want the Supreme Court to base their decision on the constitution but rather on their political or radical preferences for change. As such, they have already declared they will “pack the court”. They are pulling out all the stops to control the outcome of all issues requiring resolution by the courts.

The Democrats want to have it their way and their plan on packing the courts is another ploy to achieve that goal!
After Amy Coney Barrett was sworn in, they immedia... (show quote)



** The Democrats want to have it their way and their plan on packing the courts is another ploy to achieve that goal!**
And
This is different from trump party.......how?

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 19:02:42   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
lindajoy wrote:
Im not sure about your comment but will check it out..

Trump has actually appointed 220 with 77(?) more vacancies to fill...


You got the point, though, right?

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 19:06:24   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
FallenOak wrote:
Look it up in history, Dems gave us gerrymandering.


It was never used with the surgical computer precision as today.
When you’re separating houses on one street based on how the v**ed, that’s precise.
Republicans made a science out of it.

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 19:08:05   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
Ack wright wrote:
we really should rise up as a people and take our country back. But alas, we are all caught up posting on fb,,tw,,ig and the like to do anything about it. It would be nice to see some real balls instead of a bunch of pussies arguing about it online. I don't want blood in the streets but true action does not require any. Go with God my little twitterlings and remember the only way to heaven is through our Lord Jesus.


Really!
That’s the only way ?
Who wrote that Mitch McConnell?

Reply
 
 
Oct 28, 2020 19:46:22   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Milosia2 wrote:
You got the point, though, right?


Sure, I did..Accuracy is important, don’t want people thinking you intentionally mislead someone, right??

Along those lines;
This is a comprehensive list of all Article III and Article IV United States federal judges appointed by President Donald Trump as well as a partial list of Article I federal judicial appointments, excluding appointments to the District of Columbia judiciary.

As of October 26, 2020, the United States Senate has confirmed 220 Article III judges nominated by Trump, including three associate justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, 53 judges for the United States courts of appeals, 162 judges for the United States district courts, and two judges for the United States Court of International Trade.There are currently 34 nominations to Article III courts awaiting Senate action, including 33 for the district courts and one for the Court of International Trade. There are currently two vacancies on the U.S. courts of appeals, 55 vacancies on the U.S. district courts, and two vacancies on the U.S. Court of International Trade...Trump has not made any recess appointments to the federal courts.

In terms of Article I courts, as of October 23, 2020, the Senate has confirmed 21 judges nominated by Trump, including six for the United States Court of Federal Claims, seven for the United States Tax Court, six for the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, one for the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and one for the United States Court of Military Commission Review. There are currently eight nominations to Article I courts awaiting Senate action, including seven for the United States Court of Federal Claims and one for the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. There are currently seven vacancies on the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, one vacancy on the U.S. Tax Court, and one vacancy on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. There are no vacancies on the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims or the U.S. Court of Military Commission Review. Trump designated Susan G. Braden, Margaret M. Sweeney and Eleni M. Roumel as chief judges of the Court of Federal Claims.

Regarding Article IV territorial courts, as of February 25, 2020, the Senate has confirmed one judge nominated by Trump. There are currently no vacancies and no nominations awaiting Senate action. Trump has not elevated any judges to the position of chief judge.

And given its Wikipedia it may be incorrect too~~
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_judges_appointed_by_Donald_Trump

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 19:49:32   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
FallenOak wrote:
Calling people names is really a good way to win an argument. Dems call names. Reps are so sweet they put up with it and forgive. When the Dems win and the Reps forgive we WILL get a dictatorship and then only the Dictator wins, we all lose.


Oh my. The only way you could make such a statement is not to read or hear Republicans. I sure hope you're having some fun.

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 21:12:36   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Ack wright wrote:
we really should rise up as a people and take our country back. But alas, we are all caught up posting on fb,,tw,,ig and the like to do anything about it. It would be nice to see some real balls instead of a bunch of pussies arguing about it online. I don't want blood in the streets but true action does not require any. Go with God my little twitterlings and remember the only way to heaven is through our Lord Jesus.


So other than sitting in here ranting about it, what’s your plans to change things??
Perhaps people in here do, do other things and you just don’t know them or about what they do??

Bless you and may your angels help you see through the mirage of judgement and stand united with God towards a mission of Trust, faith and perseverance and love...

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 21:22:41   #
tbutkovich
 
Ack wright wrote:
we really should rise up as a people and take our country back. But alas, we are all caught up posting on fb,,tw,,ig and the like to do anything about it. It would be nice to see some real balls instead of a bunch of pussies arguing about it online. I don't want blood in the streets but true action does not require any. Go with God my little twitterlings and remember the only way to heaven is through our Lord Jesus.


We need a 20 million man match on Washington DC and March into the halls of Congress and extract the C*******ts from their offices and ship them to the Aleutian Islands and give them one pallet of food. Nothing More!

Either that or a simpler solution is to just v**e the bastards out of office!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.