One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Opp poll.......Another Big Tech question . ...
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Oct 18, 2020 01:56:36   #
JW
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Which they have the right to do... As American citizens... That's not interference...


Yes and no...corporations don't have a right to v**e so they really don't have a right to interfere in the e******n. The argument that they are owned by American citizens loses ground when their contributions, financial or in kind, exceed the regulatory limit. One censorship instance of a piece critical or supporting of a candidate constitutes a major in kind donation far exceeding statutory limits.

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 02:12:49   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
JW wrote:
Yes and no...corporations don't have a right to v**e so they really don't have a right to interfere in the e******n. The argument that they are owned by American citizens loses ground when their contributions, financial or in kind, exceed the regulatory limit. One censorship instance of a piece critical or supporting of a candidate constitutes a major in kind donation far exceeding statutory limits.


An interesting point of view...

Does the legislation uphold it??

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 02:31:42   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
JW wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/facebook-and-twitter-censorship-will-backfire-and-help-trumps-campaign-opinion/ar-BB1a5HNg?ocid=uxbndlbing

They have announced their intent to censor anything that puts their goal (electing Joe Biden) in jeopardy.


Nice article !!

Reply
 
 
Oct 18, 2020 03:00:30   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Which they have the right to do... As American citizens... That's not interference...


It’s not quite as straight forward as you would think. They are abusing, I believe section 203 or something like that was actually passed to regulate vulgarity in the social media platforms. I think the more problematic is these companies have monopolies. They can be broken up. When you put yourself out their as a public platform yet sensor speech you may be in violation of the first amendment also. This ain’t China.

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 03:02:30   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
JFlorio wrote:
It’s not quite as straight forward as you would think. They are abusing, I believe section 203 or something like that was actually passed to regulate vulgarity in the social media platforms. I think the more problematic is these companies have monopolies. They can be broken up. When you put yourself out their as a public platform yet sensor speech you may be in violation of the first amendment also. This ain’t China.


It's Section 230 and I believe it should be removed ! !

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 03:31:02   #
PeterS
 
proud republican wrote:
No, they're participating in Biden's e******n !!! They are donating a lot of money to sleepy Joe !

That's what Citizens United lets them do. You guys loved it when it benefited you. Are you telling me you don't like it when it's used to bring your candidate down? I'm shocked PR, just shocked. I really thought you would be more open-minded than that. After all, Trump gained the benefit of more than one billionaires pack money. You guys are the ones who thought it was great if billionaires could buy the e******n...just so they were buying it for you.

Well, in case you missed Democrats have more than a few billionaires on their side who either h**e what Trump is doing to this nation or are democrats and more than willing to throw in a few tens of millions to bring him down. It's chump change to them but a political pack targeting a candidate in just the right way can bring the SOB down.

So hurrah for Citizens United. Who would have thought that Democrat could use it be help bring Donald J Trump down!

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 03:38:02   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
PeterS wrote:
That's what Citizens United lets them do. You guys loved it when it benefited you. Are you telling me you don't like it when it's used to bring your candidate down? I'm shocked PR, just shocked. I really thought you would be more open-minded than that. After all, Trump gained the benefit of more than one billionaires pack money. You guys are the ones who thought it was great if billionaires could buy the e******n...just so they were buying it for you.

Well, in case you missed Democrats have more than a few billionaires on their side who either h**e what Trump is doing to this nation or are democrats and more than willing to throw in a few tens of millions to bring him down. It's chump change to them but a political pack targeting a candidate in just the right way can bring the SOB down.

So hurrah for Citizens United. Who would have thought that Democrat could use it be help bring Donald J Trump down!
That's what Citizens United lets them do. You guys... (show quote)


Bring President Trump down???? Ha!! You have tried everything to bring him down!! From i***tic Russian Collusion to Impeachment to taxes and he is still standing !!! You will bring him down when He'll freezes over !!

Reply
 
 
Oct 18, 2020 03:47:51   #
PeterS
 
JW wrote:
Yes and no...corporations don't have a right to v**e so they really don't have a right to interfere in the e******n. The argument that they are owned by American citizens loses ground when their contributions, financial or in kind, exceed the regulatory limit. One censorship instance of a piece critical or supporting of a candidate constitutes a major in kind donation far exceeding statutory limits.

That falls into campaign finance and as Donald Trump proved nobody really gives a damn about it. Cohen went to jail for his part in the conspiracy but Trump just snubbed his nose at it and no one seems to give a damn.

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 03:48:45   #
PeterS
 
proud republican wrote:
Bring President Trump down???? Ha!! You have tried everything to bring him down!! From i***tic Russian Collusion to Impeachment to taxes and he is still standing !!! You will bring him down when He'll freezes over !!

Then look for hell to freeze over come November third...

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 03:53:28   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
PeterS wrote:
Then look for hell to freeze over come November third...


Yeap,ok! 😁And I will look for Hillary Clinton to sing ! !😂😂

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 05:17:57   #
Tug484
 
proud republican wrote:
Is Big Tech interfering with our e******n ??


For sure!

Reply
 
 
Oct 18, 2020 05:19:02   #
Tug484
 
JFlorio wrote:
Possible? Come on Sam. It’s not just possible, it’s probable. Let’s remember. Big tech is donating huge to Biden and the Democrats nit sure not to be reigned in.


They never fact check lies about Trump.
People can say anything they want to about him.

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 05:21:04   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
No... They are American owned and corporations have individual status...

They are participating in your e******n


LOL.
Ok, then I say they are, as individuals, arguably engaging in v**er suppression.

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 05:34:16   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
proud republican wrote:
Russia!! Russia!! Russia !!!Sigh!!! Is Russia the only country in the world??? I can name at least 2 other countries that try to interfere with our e******n??? Can you guess which 2 are trying to interfere on behalf of Joe Biden???..
Russia!! Russia!! Russia !!!Sigh!!! img src="htt... (show quote)


Biden for over 20 years has been pushing the NWO and the UN which also means China (not Russia) and the Central Banks and their ponzi schemes. Nations are fed up with China so now China is investing in China and stimulating their economy as much as they can. They were preparing to make it easy for China to invade but now they have decided to just ask the UN to monitor our e******ns. Biden invited them, but somehow they're all from c*******t countries. Right now their is only one c*******t country in the world I can think of, China and they pay H****r millions and the big guy (Joe) makes 10% off the top. Pretty clear Joe and Harris will stack the courts, ram through their policies, and surrender to China, UN, Central Banks and the IMF so they can keep bleeding all nations of their wealth through usuary or as we know it interest. They will soon offer negative interest rates and load everyone up with debt and then keep raising interest rates until they control the world. I'm sticking with POTUS.

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 06:06:25   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
RandyBrian wrote:
LOL.
Ok, then I say they are, as individuals, arguably engaging in v**er suppression.


Chuckle... If they controlled the v****g that would certainly be true....

Feel free to not use their services in the future...

I certainly don't

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.