Oh come now!
He just another one planning to lose his job at the propaganda market!!!!
Milosia2 wrote:
Oh come now!
He just another one planning to lose his job at the propaganda market!!!!
Here in America, the propaganda comes almost exclusively from the left. To judge by plunging leftie media viewership numbers, the public is catching on.
Mark Levin says, "the Constitution is on the b****t."
He's right and we need to defend it with everything we can muster within and out!
Seth wrote:
Here in America, the propaganda comes almost exclusively from the left. To judge by plunging leftie media viewership numbers, the public is catching on.
The propaganda does not come exclusively from the left.
Fox Noise is exclusively a propaganda channel.
From the beginning the point of Faux Noise was to have a channel exclusively for the Right Wing agendas.
When Roger Ailes petitioned the Supreme Court to allow him to have it. The SC granted a license, but, not a News License. They granted Roger an Entertainment license. This alleviates any reason for dispensation of facts.
Entertainment is not fact oriented. What throws everyone off is the “News” in its moniker. Some people think they are watching news. News is allowed on faux noise. But only for 1 hour per day.
The rest of the day is plainly opinions of news.
Or spin, or propaganda.
I hope that cleared up where the propaganda is coming from.
PulletSurprise wrote:
Mark Levin says, "the Constitution is on the b****t."
He's right and we need to defend it with everything we can muster within and out!
Mark levin is an Idget!
Wtf does that even mean? The constitution is on the b****t?
He’s right??? This is more purely abstract propaganda to inspire more v**es for.......hmmm.
The constitution?
Where on the b****t would I find the constitution. .?
And you’re telling you’re somehow defending it?
Levin deals in the abstract leaving you to fill in the blanks which may or may not be what the point was.
bahmer wrote:
Amen and Amen
Brietbart was at one time the N**i W***e S*********t Evangelical warriors channel.
So now they’re legit?
I doubt it too.
Seth wrote:
Here in America, the propaganda comes almost exclusively from the left. To judge by plunging leftie media viewership numbers, the public is catching on.
Unfreedom of the Press by Mark Levin. At Amazon, this best seller has over 6000 reader reviews, 92% of which are given 5 stars.
Unfreedom of the Press is not just another book about the press. Levin shows how those entrusted with news reporting today are destroying freedom of the press from within: “not government oppression or suppression,” he writes, but self-censorship, group-think, bias by omission, and passing off opinion, propaganda, pseudo-events, and outright lies as news.
With the depth of historical background for which his books are renowned, Levin takes the reader on a journey through the early American patriot press, which proudly promoted the principles set forth in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, followed by the early decades of the Republic during which newspapers around the young country were open and t***sparent about their fierce allegiance to one political party or the other.
It was only at the start of the Progressive Era and the twentieth century that the supposed “objectivity of the press” first surfaced, leaving us where we are today: with a partisan party-press overwhelmingly aligned with a political ideology but hypocritically engaged in a massive unt***h as to its real nature.
Milosia wrote:
The propaganda does not come exclusively from the left.
Fox Noise is exclusively a propaganda channel.
From the beginning the point of Faux Noise was to have a channel exclusively for the Right Wing agendas.
When Roger Ailes petitioned the Supreme Court to allow him to have it. The SC granted a license, but, not a News License. They granted Roger an Entertainment license. This alleviates any reason for dispensation of facts.
Entertainment is not fact oriented. What throws everyone off is the “News” in its moniker. Some people think they are watching news. News is allowed on faux noise. But only for 1 hour per day.
The rest of the day is plainly opinions of news.
Or spin, or propaganda.
I hope that cleared up where the propaganda is coming from.
The propaganda does not come exclusively from the ... (
show quote)
You confuse networks (the "liberal" ones) that entirely propagandize with networks (conservative ones) that can present evidence to back them up.
Seth wrote:
You confuse networks (the "liberal" ones) that entirely propagandize with networks (conservative ones) that can present evidence to back them up.
I can assure you I am not confused at all.
A for instance would be how many times has trump lied while on fox noise?
Their talking heads would be tripping over themselves to cover up , twist spin that lie
Into something believable. Knowing it’s a lie.
Regular channels aren’t much better but have been questioning trumps blatant lies more often.
Trumps channel was exclusively Faux Noise. Every other was f**e news.
I would also say levin is partially correct but for all the wrong reasons.
Milosia wrote:
I can assure you I am not confused at all.
A for instance would be how many times has trump lied while on fox noise?
Their talking heads would be tripping over themselves to cover up , twist spin that lie
Into something believable. Knowing it’s a lie.
Regular channels aren’t much better but have been questioning trumps blatant lies more often.
Trumps channel was exclusively Faux Noise. Every other was f**e news.
I would also say levin is partially correct but for all the wrong reasons.
I can assure you I am not confused at all. br A fo... (
show quote)
The more you post, the more confused you seem to be. If you don't know what you're talking about, it may be better not to say anything, that way you're the only person who knows that you don't know what you're talking about. 😬
Seth wrote:
The more you post, the more confused you seem to be. If you don't know what you're talking about, it may be better not to say anything, that way you're the only person who knows that you don't know what you're talking about. 😬
Nice point Seth. But are you sure he can read it
ImLogicallyRight wrote:
Nice point Seth. But are you sure he can read it
If he/she/it
can read it, there's very likely a lot of confusion going on over there right about now.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.