One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Breaking: Biden Runs and Hides the Moment Explosive H****r B***n Bombshell is Released
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Oct 17, 2020 19:50:27   #
roy
 
byronglimish wrote:
Hey moldy...in your "own words" can you give some examples of the lies from Fox ??


I'll anwser for moldy ,just about every word that comes out of their mouth

Reply
Oct 17, 2020 20:06:05   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Rudy’s latest adventure is the amazing find of H****rs hard drive, and the story written by Hannitys former aide who now works for the NY Post. The problem is that the media is not falling for the Russians disinformation plots as easily as before. The NYPost is a part of fox.
RIDING THE D**GON: The Bidens' Chinese Secrets (Full Documentary)
(the documentary is based on corporate records, financial documents, legal briefings and court papers.

H****r B***n, son of Democratic p**********l nominee Joseph R. Biden, worked for a Shanghai investment firm involved in government and military-linked deals that bolstered the Chinese military, including the purchase of an American auto parts maker.

H****r B***n, a lawyer and investment banker, until recently was a director at Bohai Harvest RST, known as BHR, formed with $1 billion in Chinese government funding shortly after then-Vice President Biden visited China in December 2013, according to the investigative report.


BIDEN-SANDERS UNITY T***SFORMATION RECOMMENDATIONS (110 pages of C*******m)

Massive Government Overreach: Obama’s AFFH Rule Is Out

AFFH: Joe Biden’s disastrous plans for America’s suburbs

Joe Biden must release the results of his cognitive tests — v**ers need to know
Presumptive Democratic p**********l nominee Joe Biden very nearly survived his first press conference in three months without a single goof. Almost, but not quite.

At the very end of the question-and-answer session, asked by a reporter if he had been tested for “cognitive decline,” he answered, “I’ve been tested. I’ve been tested constantly.” Biden went on to say he could “hardly wait to compare my cognitive capability to the cognitive capability of the man I’m running against.”

Pretty snappy answer for a fellow thought by 38 percent of likely v**ers to be suffering a mental decline. Except, of course, that Biden’s response raised more questions than it answered.

Such as...where was he tested? Why, exactly, is he being “constantly tested”? Are his doctors worried about him? Most importantly, when will he release the results of those tests?


"I was v****g for Biden but this changed my mind to Trump".

Reply
Oct 17, 2020 20:22:20   #
moldyoldy
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
RIDING THE D**GON: The Bidens' Chinese Secrets (Full Documentary)
(the documentary is based on corporate records, financial documents, legal briefings and court papers.

H****r B***n, son of Democratic p**********l nominee Joseph R. Biden, worked for a Shanghai investment firm involved in government and military-linked deals that bolstered the Chinese military, including the purchase of an American auto parts maker.

H****r B***n, a lawyer and investment banker, until recently was a director at Bohai Harvest RST, known as BHR, formed with $1 billion in Chinese government funding shortly after then-Vice President Biden visited China in December 2013, according to the investigative report.


BIDEN-SANDERS UNITY T***SFORMATION RECOMMENDATIONS (110 pages of C*******m)

Massive Government Overreach: Obama’s AFFH Rule Is Out

AFFH: Joe Biden’s disastrous plans for America’s suburbs

Joe Biden must release the results of his cognitive tests — v**ers need to know
Presumptive Democratic p**********l nominee Joe Biden very nearly survived his first press conference in three months without a single goof. Almost, but not quite.

At the very end of the question-and-answer session, asked by a reporter if he had been tested for “cognitive decline,” he answered, “I’ve been tested. I’ve been tested constantly.” Biden went on to say he could “hardly wait to compare my cognitive capability to the cognitive capability of the man I’m running against.”

Pretty snappy answer for a fellow thought by 38 percent of likely v**ers to be suffering a mental decline. Except, of course, that Biden’s response raised more questions than it answered.

Such as...where was he tested? Why, exactly, is he being “constantly tested”? Are his doctors worried about him? Most importantly, when will he release the results of those tests?


"I was v****g for Biden but this changed my mind to Trump".
url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRmlcEBAiIs&a... (show quote)



You need a cognitive test if you can’t see that trump is h*****g on by a thread.



Reply
 
 
Oct 17, 2020 20:25:48   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
roy wrote:
I'll anwser for moldy ,just about every word that comes out of their mouth


That's no answer.

Reply
Oct 17, 2020 22:49:50   #
hdjimv Loc: South Dakota
 

Politifact and Yakimaherald! Get real.
Politifact and Yakimaherald! Get real....

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 06:32:14   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
You guys can say what you want about Fox News. Here is my real world review.
Starting over twenty years ago, when I was a CNN junkie, I started noticing something. I would watch an event (political speech, football game, world event, wh**ever) on live TV. Then CNN anchors (NOT opinion pieces, straight factual news) would tell me what was said, done, or had happened at that event. It started small, with just leanings, but it quickly became blatant. Example: A Police official gave an update on a nationally important case, straight forward and factual on live TV, then afterward, and repeated hourly, the CNN anchors would explain what he had said. But there would be remarks condemning the administration for creating the situation and those remarks were ATTRIBUTED TO THE POLICE OFFICIAL, who had said nothing of the kind. Over a few years, I began to get angrier and angrier. I watched opinion anchors because I was interested in their opinions. But I watched NEWS anchors because I wanted facts....not opinions. It got to the point that the I could not trust anything CNN said. I began having to fact check what they said before I dared repeat it to my wife. So I started watching other news. NBC was worse. ABC and CBS were less bad, but still unacceptable. Thus I came to try out FOX which had been newly added to our small town cable system. In all the years since I have not seen FOX, NOT ONCE, present a news story that added or deleted something to an event that was not factually accurate. I found it wonderful to get the straight news stories again. Sure, Bill O'Reilly or Hannity or some of the others raged and ranted, but they made it clear that they were expressing opinions. They never gave opinions and claimed it was raw fact. I watched them when I felt like it, but got my news from the news anchors. I still watch the others news as well as FOX, but they have gotten worse than ever over the last four years. No longer even pretending they are providing real news. FOX news isn't as good as it used to be, but I will trust them faster and harder than the others all put together.

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 08:22:52   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
Ha ha, good one, and also the t***h!

Reply
 
 
Oct 18, 2020 10:36:35   #
CarryOn
 
RandyBrian wrote:
You guys can say what you want about Fox News. Here is my real world review.
Starting over twenty years ago, when I was a CNN junkie, I started noticing something. I would watch an event (political speech, football game, world event, wh**ever) on live TV. Then CNN anchors (NOT opinion pieces, straight factual news) would tell me what was said, done, or had happened at that event. It started small, with just leanings, but it quickly became blatant. Example: A Police official gave an update on a nationally important case, straight forward and factual on live TV, then afterward, and repeated hourly, the CNN anchors would explain what he had said. But there would be remarks condemning the administration for creating the situation and those remarks were ATTRIBUTED TO THE POLICE OFFICIAL, who had said nothing of the kind. Over a few years, I began to get angrier and angrier. I watched opinion anchors because I was interested in their opinions. But I watched NEWS anchors because I wanted facts....not opinions. It got to the point that the I could not trust anything CNN said. I began having to fact check what they said before I dared repeat it to my wife. So I started watching other news. NBC was worse. ABC and CBS were less bad, but still unacceptable. Thus I came to try out FOX which had been newly added to our small town cable system. In all the years since I have not seen FOX, NOT ONCE, present a news story that added or deleted something to an event that was not factually accurate. I found it wonderful to get the straight news stories again. Sure, Bill O'Reilly or Hannity or some of the others raged and ranted, but they made it clear that they were expressing opinions. They never gave opinions and claimed it was raw fact. I watched them when I felt like it, but got my news from the news anchors. I still watch the others news as well as FOX, but they have gotten worse than ever over the last four years. No longer even pretending they are providing real news. FOX news isn't as good as it used to be, but I will trust them faster and harder than the others all put together.
You guys can say what you want about Fox News. He... (show quote)


Excellent post randy ... just telling it like it is ..

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 10:44:36   #
moldyoldy
 
RandyBrian wrote:
You guys can say what you want about Fox News. Here is my real world review.
Starting over twenty years ago, when I was a CNN junkie, I started noticing something. I would watch an event (political speech, football game, world event, wh**ever) on live TV. Then CNN anchors (NOT opinion pieces, straight factual news) would tell me what was said, done, or had happened at that event. It started small, with just leanings, but it quickly became blatant. Example: A Police official gave an update on a nationally important case, straight forward and factual on live TV, then afterward, and repeated hourly, the CNN anchors would explain what he had said. But there would be remarks condemning the administration for creating the situation and those remarks were ATTRIBUTED TO THE POLICE OFFICIAL, who had said nothing of the kind. Over a few years, I began to get angrier and angrier. I watched opinion anchors because I was interested in their opinions. But I watched NEWS anchors because I wanted facts....not opinions. It got to the point that the I could not trust anything CNN said. I began having to fact check what they said before I dared repeat it to my wife. So I started watching other news. NBC was worse. ABC and CBS were less bad, but still unacceptable. Thus I came to try out FOX which had been newly added to our small town cable system. In all the years since I have not seen FOX, NOT ONCE, present a news story that added or deleted something to an event that was not factually accurate. I found it wonderful to get the straight news stories again. Sure, Bill O'Reilly or Hannity or some of the others raged and ranted, but they made it clear that they were expressing opinions. They never gave opinions and claimed it was raw fact. I watched them when I felt like it, but got my news from the news anchors. I still watch the others news as well as FOX, but they have gotten worse than ever over the last four years. No longer even pretending they are providing real news. FOX news isn't as good as it used to be, but I will trust them faster and harder than the others all put together.
You guys can say what you want about Fox News. He... (show quote)


Better change that moniker to Rancid Brain.

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 11:23:25   #
Seth
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Don't you wish your Russian talking points were half true


Keep the faith, there, Mr. Lone, right up to the bitter end.

Trump came into office with a bogus Russia Collusion concoction aimed his way and rode it out because even two years of all out "investigation" by hostile "investigators" and $40 million in taxpayer funds couldn't produce a shred of admissible evidence of wrongdoing.

Now Biden's going into an e******n facing actual evidence of corruption and what amount at worst to treasonous activities, at best abusing his former position as vice president and opening himself up to blackmail by the CCP and who knows how many Ukrainian criminals should he become president.

Now the shoe is on the other foot, except this time there is evidence and it won't take two years and $40 million to show the American people what the Democrats are trying to foist on us.

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 12:43:09   #
moldyoldy
 
Seth wrote:
Keep the faith, there, Mr. Lone, right up to the bitter end.

Trump came into office with a bogus Russia Collusion concoction aimed his way and rode it out because even two years of all out "investigation" by hostile "investigators" and $40 million in taxpayer funds couldn't produce a shred of admissible evidence of wrongdoing.

Now Biden's going into an e******n facing actual evidence of corruption and what amount at worst to treasonous activities, at best abusing his former position as vice president and opening himself up to blackmail by the CCP and who knows how many Ukrainian criminals should he become president.

Now the shoe is on the other foot, except this time there is evidence and it won't take two years and $40 million to show the American people what the Democrats are trying to foist on us.
Keep the faith, there, Mr. Lone, right up to the b... (show quote)


Two years of being blocked from Russia investigations by rosenstein. More than 40 million in profits recovered from fines of guilty trump people.

Reply
 
 
Oct 18, 2020 13:14:57   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Better change that moniker to Rancid Brain.


I stated facts as I lived them. Don't like it? Tough. Your response is to attempt a childish insult? LOL!
I assume you are not interested in, or unable, to present a reasoned disagreement, since you have fallen back on your habitual attack mode.
Folks, this is the kind of mentality that wants us to v**e for the democrats.

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 13:18:06   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Two years of being blocked from Russia investigations by rosenstein. More than 40 million in profits recovered from fines of guilty trump people.


Debunked nonsense. Endlessly repeated. What a grand strategy.

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 13:34:27   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
RandyBrian wrote:
I stated facts as I lived them. Don't like it? Tough. Your response is to attempt a childish insult? LOL!
I assume you are not interested in, or unable, to present a reasoned disagreement, since you have fallen back on your habitual attack mode.
Folks, this is the kind of mentality that wants us to v**e for the democrats.


There it is!, Mr Brian.

Reply
Oct 18, 2020 14:02:57   #
moldyoldy
 
RandyBrian wrote:
Debunked nonsense. Endlessly repeated. What a grand strategy.


Obviously rancid brain is accurate.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.