factnotfiction

They simply love bad ideas and outcomes, which is why they love trump




https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/09/e*******l-college-terrible/597589/

steve66613

This November, you could bring the hordes of Ghengis Khan and Nepolean’s army, but, you won’t beat Trump!

Auntie Dee

The Atlantic is a liberal magazine dev**ed to the so-called "elitist" Democrats, that is almost solely their readership and will always feature Left-leaning arguments such as this one in an attempt to rationalize their Socialist leanings! There total readership is less than 500,000 and concentrated mostly in the NY/DC corridor!

Once again a l*****t publication is attempting to change our history to fit their own ideology! Everyone realizes if the E*******l College is done away with, that this country will become a one-party RULED country! That was NEVER the intention of our Founding Fathers or of our Constitution!

The only exception being if most of California, Oregon & Washington State happened to fall into the ocean & enough people came to their senses to escape the crime and high taxes of NY and neighboring states...Of that, we can only dream!!

Auntie Dee

???? This is a LIBERAL publication - I sincerely doubt if they love Trump! What in this article could possible make you think that?

Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas

You didn't complain about the e*******l college when that q***r Obammy got elected.

factnotfiction

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

factnotfiction

And you know how excited weird woofwoof gets when he gets his treats

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

I read the Atlantic article. What I found was a Baltimore university professor, who is supposedly a constitutional scholar, applying postmodern philosophy to deconstruct the Federalist papers and our constitution. How this "educated" moron was able to psychoanalyze Alexander Hamilton is anybody's guess.

Epps should be drawn and quartered.

factnotfiction

Since your silly and uneducated opinion because you disagree with someone far smarter and better educated and far more widely read than you

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

WTF happened to you anyway? Yo mama fail to breast feed you? Did your uncle sexually abuse you? Kids at school bully you? Did you even go to school? You have a skull full of mush there, b***hyboy. What turned you into such a wretched punk?

factnotfiction

What turned you into such a wretched old woman? Abused by family members? Or just plain stupid

Ooooooh the sissy gay blade is getting so nasty because his limited mental ability is put on display again, so why not post some more of your phony, fraud pictures where you pretend to be some kind of a bad man?

Or do yourself a small favor and STFU cowardly ranter

Big Kahuna

Deballed and defunded would be better options.

Big Kahuna

Then why is Beau Berghdol your hero? You are a true fairyboy like that t*****r Bathhouse Barry Ovommit.

Kickaha Loc: Nebraska

Have you ever read the Federalist Papers? You really should read them. For you and others who may be unfamiliar with the Federalist Papers, they were a series of essays that focused on different aspects of the Constitution to help sway people to support ratification. There was a big concern even back then that if the President was elected by a popular v**e, the small states would have no say in the governing of the country. The e*******l college was a guarantee that a couple of highly populous states would not run roughshod over the rest of the country.
Perhaps you would like a better/fairer allocation of the e*******l v**es. Whoever wins the statewide popular v**e, receives the two e*******l v**es as represented by the Senators. The e*******l v**es as represented by the Congressional Districts would go to the winner of each respective district. For example in the 2016 e******n, Hillary won California and received all 55 v**es. Under my proposal she would have received 2 v**es for winning the statewide popular v**e, the other 53 would have been divided between Hillary and Trump according to who won each congressional district. This would have cost Hillary some e*******l v**es in California, but she would have picked up some in states won by Trump. This would force candidates to truly campaign nationwide and put together a platform that can generate nationwide support.