Iliamna1 wrote:
That is a brazen lie! Pro-lifers adopt a LOT of babies and try to provide supportive services through a number of organizations and homes.
If they adopt so many, why are there so many children in foster homes?
Tiptop789 wrote:
If they adopt so many, why are there so many children in foster homes?
There were children in Foster homes and orphanages way before a******n was legal. Might want to ask a person that grew up in Foster care if they would have rather been aborted. You say the dumbest things.
Many OO adopt! However, many of the powers that be object to Christians and conservatives from adopting other racial children from being adopted. 'They prefer that those so-called unwanted children go into foster care and group homes instead . . . with predictably disastrous results..
I knew several couples in liberal Austin, Texas, who would have gratefully have adopted any child they could get. They were prosperous and spent may thousands of dollars on attorneys and other adoptive fees and were Never allowed to adopt for the fatal flaw of being Christians. I wanted to adopt, but could never afford it on a nurse's salary.
JFlorio wrote:
There were children in Foster homes and orphanages way before a******n was legal. Might want to ask a person that grew up in Foster care if they would have rather been aborted. You say the dumbest things.
So your saying there were no a******ns before they were legal? And you're asking who says dumb things? That's not the point. It's up to the mother to decide, not you and your pro-life friends. The mother knows the unique situation she is in. I mentioned that because the pro-lifers always preach put the babies up for adoption. Anyway, this is a stupid conversant. I'm not going to convince you & you're not going to convince me. I wouldn't try & convince a mother to have an a******n, just the opposite. But I still think it's up to the mother.
Hey lying lemming did I say there were no a******ns? Nope. I said they were illegal. If you believe as I do that a fetus is a human life then no, the mother does not have the right to take that life. You must believe a fetus is nothing more than a lump of flesh then I could see why you’re O.K. With it. By the way science is proving that fetuses at ever younger periods feel pain and react to stimulus.
Tiptop789 wrote:
So your saying there were no a******ns before they were legal? And you're asking who says dumb things? That's not the point. It's up to the mother to decide, not you and your pro-life friends. The mother knows the unique situation she is in. I mentioned that because the pro-lifers always preach put the babies up for adoption. Anyway, this is a stupid conversant. I'm not going to convince you & you're not going to convince me. I wouldn't try & convince a mother to have an a******n, just the opposite. But I still think it's up to the mother.
So your saying there were no a******ns before they... (
show quote)
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.