One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Tell Us More, Liberals, About How "Mail-In Votes" Fights Voter Suppression
Jun 29, 2020 17:24:16   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
A full 20% of New Jersey's ballots were rejected. Since NJ is an overwhelmingly Democrat state, probably the ones rejected were suspected of being Republican.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/06/29/1-in-5-ballots-rejected-as-fraud-charged-in-new-jersey-mail-in-election/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=1-in

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 17:30:12   #
Carol Kelly
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
A full 20% of New Jersey's ballots were rejected. Since NJ is an overwhelmingly Democrat state, probably the ones rejected were suspected of being Republican.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/06/29/1-in-5-ballots-rejected-as-fraud-charged-in-new-jersey-mail-in-election/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=1-in


Mail in votes would be the end of US. It’s bad enough that dead people vote and some people vote in more than one state, town or county. Unless you have a really good reason, like hospitalized with CCP virus, get out to the polls with proper ID and don’t let anyone change the Constitution. Oh, yes, and those boxes from GIs in Afghanistan, etc., please open and count.

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 17:30:59   #
roy
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
A full 20% of New Jersey's ballots were rejected. Since NJ is an overwhelmingly Democrat state, probably the ones rejected were suspected of being Republican.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/06/29/1-in-5-ballots-rejected-as-fraud-charged-in-new-jersey-mail-in-election/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=1-in


Prove it and quit running your mouth.

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 17:32:25   #
Carol Kelly
 
roy wrote:
Prove it and quit running your mouth.


He said probably.

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 17:33:44   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
A full 20% of New Jersey's ballots were rejected. Since NJ is an overwhelmingly Democrat state, probably the ones rejected were suspected of being Republican.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/06/29/1-in-5-ballots-rejected-as-fraud-charged-in-new-jersey-mail-in-election/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=1-in




Now that's a shocker Smed, everyone knows if a Democrat wants it there is bound to be the advantage of fraud in their favor.

Seems to be a pattern

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 17:35:05   #
son of witless
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
A full 20% of New Jersey's ballots were rejected. Since NJ is an overwhelmingly Democrat state, probably the ones rejected were suspected of being Republican.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/06/29/1-in-5-ballots-rejected-as-fraud-charged-in-new-jersey-mail-in-election/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=1-in


Liberals do not care. Winning by hook or by crook is all that matters.

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 17:44:51   #
Auntie Lulu
 
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
Now that's a shocker Smed, everyone knows if a Democrat wants it there is bound to be the advantage of fraud in their favor.

Seems to be a pattern


I certainly agree with that.

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 18:19:51   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
roy wrote:
Prove it and quit running your mouth.


I found 3 mailbags of ballots strewn in the woods last Presidential election good enough?

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 19:46:37   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
roy wrote:
Prove it and quit running your mouth.



Can you read?

| Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2020 IDF International Technologies, Inc.