One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Pelosi k**ls C****av***s bill because it didn’t include these demands
Mar 24, 2020 18:46:26   #
thebigp
 
HOPE THAT WITCH GETS WHATS DUE HER
By Chris Enloe March 24, 2020
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is reportedly why Democrats suddenly opposed an emergency c****av***s relief bill that had bipartisan support in the Senate.
According to Ben Williamson, the chief of staff for Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), Pelosi returned to Washington, D.C., on Sunday with a wish list of sudden demands, striking down the bipartisan agreement made by the Senate.
“Senate spends all weekend negotiating a bipartisan deal. Agreement reached. Pelosi flies in from California, whips out her unrelated ‘wishlist,’ and says no. Senate Democrats then v**e against proceeding on a bill they negotiated. Jaw dropping,” Williamson explained.
John Bresnahan, Politico’s Washington bureau chief, reported that Pelosi had a “laundry list” of new demands, including many items completely unrelated to C****-** relief, like e******n security funding, student loan debt forgiveness, and a “host of other issues.”
Despite the Senate’s agreement, Pelosi also revealed on Sunday that House Democrats would move forward with their own c****av***s relief package.
According to Politico, Pelosi’s actions even have some members of the Democratic caucus questioning her motives.
Many of those same provisions are also being negotiated in the Senate bill but some House Democrats wanted to go even further, using the urgency of the herculean package to achieve broader, long term policy goals like a massive infrastructure deal.
But even some House Democrats are privately wondering what is Pelosi’s endgame, especially given that lawmakers, including many in her own caucus, don’t even want to return to Washington at all, much less for a standoff with the Senate.
The motive, according to New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman, is political — it is all about hurting President Donald Trump.
“Some Dems are betting that Trump will he received as Bush post-Katrina as opposed to Bush post-9/11. And there’s a split among Dems about how they ought to be handling Trump in this moment, which so far has ended up benefiting the president,” Haberman reported Sunday.
Democrats have already seized on the moment to further demonize Republicans.
It is well established that Republicans and Democrats in the Senate had come to an agreement on the relief package. But after Pelosi’s bucking, Democrats began circulating talking points that blamed Republicans for the impasse. They claimed Republicans attempted to insert a $500 billion “slush fund” into the bill.
But according to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Democrats are just playing games.
“The notion that we have time to play games here with the American economy and the American people is utterly absurd,” he said in a fiery speech on the Senate floor Sunday night.
Author: Chris Enloe

Reply
Mar 24, 2020 18:58:02   #
tbutkovich
 
Schumer is the minority speaker of the Senate and things were progressing well until Fancy Nancy flew into Washington DC and through a wrench into the system. She browbeat “WUSS Schumer and demanded he change the bill to insert progressive programs into the bill. She decided to use the bill to further the Democrat Party’s liberal agenda. America waits for relief while these i***ts try to prostitute the bill! So Sad!

Reply
Mar 24, 2020 19:02:51   #
woodguru
 
The right doesn't seem to want to talk about the fact that its the right that doesn't seem to want their right to give bailouts to whoever they want...in fact trump said he would oversee who gets them...like that makes anyone feel better. They literally had language that they didn't have to say who got money for six months, and how easy do you think it would have been to get this white house to fully disclose exactly where it went?

Anything done needs to be done with the understanding that nothing is going to be done for any entity that isn't done in the open.

Reply
 
 
Mar 24, 2020 19:12:33   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
woodguru wrote:
The right doesn't seem to want to talk about the fact that its the right that doesn't seem to want their right to give bailouts to whoever they want...in fact trump said he would oversee who gets them...like that makes anyone feel better. They literally had language that they didn't have to say who got money for six months, and how easy do you think it would have been to get this white house to fully disclose exactly where it went?

Anything done needs to be done with the understanding that nothing is going to be done for any entity that isn't done in the open.
The right doesn't seem to want to talk about the f... (show quote)


Not so, woodguru. President Trump has appointed an oversight czar for the corporate bailout to mandate money not be used as buyback funds for company stock, but instead directed towards furloughed workers.

You have a responsibility as a citizen not to lie. Enough of your labor union hype.

Reply
Mar 24, 2020 19:30:49   #
Liberty Tree
 
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
Not so, woodguru. President Trump has appointed an oversight czar for the corporate bailout to mandate money not be used as buyback funds for company stock, but instead directed towards furloughed workers.

You have a responsibility as a citizen not to lie. Enough of your labor union hype.


If he does not lie he cannot support his position.

Reply
Mar 24, 2020 19:57:19   #
Lonewolf
 
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
Not so, woodguru. President Trump has appointed an oversight czar for the corporate bailout to mandate money not be used as buyback funds for company stock, but instead directed towards furloughed workers.

You have a responsibility as a citizen not to lie. Enough of your labor union hype.


you are correct but it will all be done in secret so the tax payers don't know where it goes

Reply
Mar 25, 2020 05:49:45   #
Tug484
 
thebigp wrote:
HOPE THAT WITCH GETS WHATS DUE HER
By Chris Enloe March 24, 2020
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is reportedly why Democrats suddenly opposed an emergency c****av***s relief bill that had bipartisan support in the Senate.
According to Ben Williamson, the chief of staff for Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), Pelosi returned to Washington, D.C., on Sunday with a wish list of sudden demands, striking down the bipartisan agreement made by the Senate.
“Senate spends all weekend negotiating a bipartisan deal. Agreement reached. Pelosi flies in from California, whips out her unrelated ‘wishlist,’ and says no. Senate Democrats then v**e against proceeding on a bill they negotiated. Jaw dropping,” Williamson explained.
John Bresnahan, Politico’s Washington bureau chief, reported that Pelosi had a “laundry list” of new demands, including many items completely unrelated to C****-** relief, like e******n security funding, student loan debt forgiveness, and a “host of other issues.”
Despite the Senate’s agreement, Pelosi also revealed on Sunday that House Democrats would move forward with their own c****av***s relief package.
According to Politico, Pelosi’s actions even have some members of the Democratic caucus questioning her motives.
Many of those same provisions are also being negotiated in the Senate bill but some House Democrats wanted to go even further, using the urgency of the herculean package to achieve broader, long term policy goals like a massive infrastructure deal.
But even some House Democrats are privately wondering what is Pelosi’s endgame, especially given that lawmakers, including many in her own caucus, don’t even want to return to Washington at all, much less for a standoff with the Senate.
The motive, according to New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman, is political — it is all about hurting President Donald Trump.
“Some Dems are betting that Trump will he received as Bush post-Katrina as opposed to Bush post-9/11. And there’s a split among Dems about how they ought to be handling Trump in this moment, which so far has ended up benefiting the president,” Haberman reported Sunday.
Democrats have already seized on the moment to further demonize Republicans.
It is well established that Republicans and Democrats in the Senate had come to an agreement on the relief package. But after Pelosi’s bucking, Democrats began circulating talking points that blamed Republicans for the impasse. They claimed Republicans attempted to insert a $500 billion “slush fund” into the bill.
But according to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Democrats are just playing games.
“The notion that we have time to play games here with the American economy and the American people is utterly absurd,” he said in a fiery speech on the Senate floor Sunday night.
Author: Chris Enloe
HOPE THAT WITCH GETS WHATS DUE HER br By Chris Enl... (show quote)



I'd h**e to live at her house.
I bet her husband never wins or her kids.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.