gardenman Loc: Cardinal nation

No c*****e c****e is not a man made phenomenon!
Yes man is exacerbating the, what has been, natural warming cycle of the earths atmosphere.

Politicians, of both parties, keep their bases riled up so they don’t have to do any real work.
Anyone that doesn’t believe the science needs to throw their everything technology in the trash can! You wouldn’t be here reading this note were it not for science. My favorite part is that the iPhone7 I am posting this note from only works because of one who was called “the most beautiful woman on earth” back in the 1930-40’s, but I digress.

Earths climate history has shown that when the atmosphere fills with carbon dioxide it traps the heat created by the suns rays, hence warming earths climate.
Earths climate history shows that the earth has experienced multiple ice ages, which were all separated by warming cycles.

The smart conversation should be about how does man stop adding heat trapping carbon to our atmosphere.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

The smart conversation is how does man adapt to a constantly changing environment...

Forget the carbon, we should be far more concerned with serious pollutants that are pumped into our air...

gardenman Loc: Cardinal nation

How does carbon not qualify as a serious pollutant? I’m one guy you don’t want to have a pollution conversation with. I live in St. Louis Missouri, we have a history with pollution that has a very bad future for every where and one east of the Mississippi River.
Our past;
Times beach
Cold water creek
Mallinkrodt

The future;
West lake landfill, do a google search, if you don’t come away fearful for everyone east of the St. Louis metro area, then you care not about your progeny generations.

I grew up barely a crow flies mile south of McDonald Douglas, and played in cold water creek on a regular basis.

FYI; McDonald Douglas developed and built the cruise missile, including the nuclear warheads they carried.

I wonder regularly about the, now Boing, complex and how much nuclear waste is buried in that complex.

The “cut regulations” BS that comes from the mouths of the LCT’s both insults, and angers me greatly! Were it not for the EPA and it’s regulations the cuyahoga River wouldn’t be the water play area it is today.

It is my opinion that their isn’t one regulation that protects the environment that is to expensive for business.
If a business can’t make money without poisoning the environment, then they don’t belong in business.
I feel the same way about regulations that protect workers.

If you paid attention you’d notice that the LCT’s never give a specific when they mention cutting regulations.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

How is carbon a pollutant?

It is a natural product found in nature...

Fires, volcanoes, hotsprings, and of course the millions of life forms that draw breath are all sources for it...

It is also utilized by plants and other organisms to grow and protect themselves...

None of the hortors you speak of in St. Louis were caused by carbon...

gardenman Loc: Cardinal nation

Are F’n kidding me?
How is carbon not a pollutant, pour a can of motor oil in the next bath you take!

The times beach circumstance was from pouring tainted oil on their gravel roads. Oil is carbon!

Try hooking a hose to your auto exhaust and run it into your home, it is only CARBON monoxide.

Do you ever think about what you’re writing before you do?

It was a volcanic eruption that caused “the little ice age”. Everything a volcano expels is carbon based!

It was all the carbon based materials expelled into our atmosphere by the Yucatán asteroid, followed by a couple few volcanoes that created the circumstance that k**led the dinosaurs.

I’ve never met a documentary, or biography that didn’t interest me.

One would think that by my moniker you could surmise that I am very knowledgeable about all things nature.

I’ve done a lot of things in my life both professional and personal that have resulted in many people, on many different occasions, and many different subjects, say to me “how do you know that”, about things they found obscure.

I qiut apologizing years ago for being more knowledgeable than most people.

It is only on my couch, but I have won millions of dollars on jeopardy:)

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

Cacasdad... Listen man...

Carbon dioxide is a natural product that our world needs...

Try filling your car with a high concentration of any gas... You die...

Oil is far more than just carbon...

Carbon is not a bad thing...

FallenOak Loc: St George Utah

You are all talking about c*****e c****e, how about a few climate dollars as c*****e c****e doesn't go so far now that I am retired. Yes I do pinch my c*****e c****e pennies but a few c*****e c****e dollars would put a better quality of food on the table.

EN Submarine Qualified Loc: Wisconsin East coast

Have to smile when reading the stuff on c*****e c****e.
The solution to c*****e c****e is to simply cut off the 22 million annual rip-off the sponsors are sucking in and it is all over..

Alber

The continuing propaganda of the media about the so-called “c*****e c****e” attributed to the increase in CO2 in the atmosphere, as a product of human actions, is of concern. This propaganda is intimidating for those people who lack the most elementary knowledge of science and for the benefit of those who participate in this OPP forum I make this publication.
It is said that thousands of scientists ensure it is real; but it is not said that another equal or greater number of scientists say it is a h**x. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a very important molecule for life on the planet itself. If CO2 is so bad, why many farmers who have greenhouses buy CO2 generators and thereby double the growth of plants. Even in aquariums they use these generators so that the marine flora grows correctly. There cannot be a world in which CO2 is eliminated because there would be no life, the vegetable kingdom would die without this molecule. Scientists who claim that the "c*****e c****e" attributed to CO2 is a h**x, say that a considerable reduction of that molecule can generate major problems for the planet and for the climate, which dissipates the idea that warming by CO2 is harmful to the atmosphere; and it can be said that the catastrophism that is imputed to this molecule, serves the organisms that live from the chimera of g****l w*****g, by means of subsidies and fines that are imposed on those who break the regulations. Let's see: if you live in Europe and modify your car briefly and it generates more CO2 than authorized, the fine is 30,000 euros per vehicle. Take Spain as an example, for having signed the Kyoto treaty it had to pay between 2008 and 2012 more than 800 million euros to the various agencies, for having breached the aforementioned treaty. Car companies and airlines that fail to comply with CO2 emission regulations must pay millionaire fines. Here it is clear that everything comes down to raising money and that the objective is economic. There is a relationship of more than 30,000 scientists who oppose what Al Gore says, that politician and show man, who was the one who spread the idea of “g****l w*****g”, who was given a Nobel Peace Prize (as well as the that given to Obama, without any merit, just because of the color of his skin), having known later that much of what is stated in his documentary is not true, since the figures and data were falsified to give credibility to the forgery assembled (equal to Obama’s case and the war in Libya and the Middle East). Antarctica does not melt, NASA says the opposite; and the number of polar bears has not decreased, as specialists and biologists in Canada have detected an increase in these bears. Al Gore is a f**er, who presents himself as a champion of nature, a savior of the planet, when this millionaire contaminates it greatly, with the zinc companies he owns. He proposes that the rest of humanity do the opposite of what he does.
Now, "environmental pollution" is something different: and this is what must be fought. Fukushima radiation is worrisome, because it continues to pollute the environment and they don't know how to stop it. This nuclear plant continues to pour 300 tons of radioactive waste into the Pacific Ocean every day, having totally contaminated this ocean and will continue to do so indefinitely since the source of the leak cannot be sealed, because it is inaccessible to both humans and robots, due to extremely high temperatures This could be the worst environmental disaster in the history of mankind and is hardly mentioned by politicians, conventional scientists, or the news.
Environmental pollution in China, which is the first producer of items in the world, considering that almost everything that is acquired in the West comes from that country. There is the authentic "environmental pollution" not in Europe or in the USA, where that pollution is a thing of the past.
Another pollution is called geoengineering or "chemtrails", which are the chemical trails produced by what "is added unnecessarily" to the fuel of airplanes. For a few years nowadays we see how the smoke trails left by the planes, which were not seen before, extend. We must also mention the fires that destroy vegetal biology; soils contaminated by metals, such as aluminum among many others; genetically modified crops; pesticides and pesticides, etc.
"Environmental pollution" is what must be fought and not the CO2 that is the basis of our biology; of course, this is not considered in the Kyoto treaty, which responds to a mafia that seeks economic performance by sk**lfully taking advantage of directing social claims for camouf**ged lobbies as an NGO so that they can openly justify these enormous economic sanctions. Here it has to be kept track of money and see who are the ones who get the most benefit from all this deception. Is there anything here for Soros NGOs?
As we have already said, CO2 is fundamental for life, in times like the Jurassic era the planet was a vergel of life and the carbon dioxide rates were immense, much larger than the current ones and nature was constantly growing.
In order to understand what CO2 represents in the atmosphere, it is necessary to analyze its composition. We have that nitrogen is 78% of its composition, oxygen is 21%, argon is O, 9%, leaving 0.1% that we can call as traces of gases; and that's where the CO2 is. If we analyze the composition of the traces of gases, we will have that the main one of those gases is the water vapor with 95% of the mentioned traces (0.095 of the composition of the atmosphere <ca>), the CO2 is 3.5 % of the traces (0.0035 of the <ca>), the neon is 1% (0.001 of the <ca>), leaving 0.5% of the traces of other gases (0.0005 of the <ca> >), which are practically negligible (krypton, xenon, hydrogen, ozone, nitrous oxide ...). However, the CO2 caused by human activity amounts to 3%, considering that 97% is produced by nature. Thus, it can be calculated how much CO2 attributed to human activity in the composition of the atmosphere rises and will verify that it is ridiculous (0.000105). Greta Thunberg says she can see the CO2 in the atmosphere!!! However, how many billions of USD are raised by this concept?
After explaining all of the above, it is necessary to analyze the intimidation that is being submitted to us daily through the media and how this intimidation is used to advance certain political ideas, such as the implementation of socialism.

EN Submarine Qualified Loc: Wisconsin East coast

Damn, how I wish the fools and ignorant sheep could commit this essay to memory and stand on the street corner and regurgitate it verbatim all day.

housewife

That was a great rant about c*****e c****e. It was one of the best I've read. The only thing I would add would be to plant more trees, they love lots of CO2.
Thanks for sharing!

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

Think everyone can get on board with planting trees... China has planted millions over the past decade...

Excellent carbon dinks, provide fresh air, and help with soil erosion...

Mikeyavelli

Hah, I actually lost on Jeopardy! I came in second, but got to keep the money. Great gigs later because I was a Jeopardy! Contestant.
Are you also a Deacon in
The First Vegan Church of Modern Day Chickenlittlists?

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

Carbon monoxide is not CO2, oil "carbon " is not CO2

CO2 levels today are a small fraction of the dozens of times our earths history has had high CO2 levels prior to any industrial activity by man.

Prior to 1960 worldwide Volcanic eruptions were +/- 12

We now have 7-12 worldwide every day with average eruptions 20,000 feet plus or minus. In 2019 we had two historic (in our generation) two eruptions exceeding 60,000 feet.

Any idea how much CO2 just one Volcanic eruption at 20,000 emits? More than 2500 pulp plants, steel mills emit in a year.
Do the math.......
This dosen't count the same increases in underwater Volcanic eruptions....
So now do the math....

When someone talks only using empty talking points from ignorant sources blindly following an agenda.

Man's sins are polluting our planet but if it was man warming the planet also then keep it up..... every warming period over the last 2000 years has produced growth, health and prosperity as result in increased plant growth and agricultural.

If you were informed then you would know that the levels of CO2 reduction levels lead by the left are below what plants need to flourish.......just one wrinkle in the lie of CO2.

Jack

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

Fantastic,
But sadly these robot lockstep l*****t will simply call this a lie of environmental hating right trumpsters.....blinded by darkness, blinded by the brainwashing CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC that has collusion with the DNC.

Jack