One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
T*********r Nonsense
Page 1 of 2 next>
Feb 17, 2020 06:55:41   #
American Vet
 
There seems to be widespread agreement in liberal circles that 18-year-olds are too immature to be trusted with anything dangerous. They want 21 to be the legal age to smoke cigarettes, vape, drunk alcohol or buy a gun.

Yet they will fight to the death to make sure children 16 and younger can decide for themselves whether to have doctors shoot them full of puberty-blocking drugs with unknown potential side-effects on their bodies, if they believe they’re t*********r. We can’t test cosmetics on animals, but we can use our children as guinea pigs for testing unproven puberty blocking chemicals.

In South Dakota, there was an attempt to change the law to stop what would, in previous years, have been immediately recognized as dangerous quackery and child abuse. And despite the fact that the South Dakota government is entirely run by Republicans, with staggering majorities in both Houses, the attempt failed when the House passed it but the Senate did not.

https://www.westernjournal.com/south-dakota-senate-bows-l**t-outrage-mob-k**ls-child-sex-change-bill/

And here’s an article from last week, before the bill was defeated, that includes more background about how giving dangerous chemicals to children has become a trendy political crusade, and what it can do to their bodies. Also, what the advocates for this don’t want you to know. Like how Jazz Jennings has been touted as the public face of a healthy t*********r child for years, but we’re only now learning that she suffered severe complications and went through four painful surgeries because years of hormone blockers while still growing caused her sexual organs to develop in ways that the surgeons weren’t sure how to deal with.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/south-dakota-house-passes-bill-to-protect-kids-from-chemical-castration/

Reply
Feb 17, 2020 07:32:50   #
Kevyn
 
American Vet wrote:
There seems to be widespread agreement in liberal circles that 18-year-olds are too immature to be trusted with anything dangerous. They want 21 to be the legal age to smoke cigarettes, vape, drunk alcohol or buy a gun.

Yet they will fight to the death to make sure children 16 and younger can decide for themselves whether to have doctors shoot them full of puberty-blocking drugs with unknown potential side-effects on their bodies, if they believe they’re t*********r. We can’t test cosmetics on animals, but we can use our children as guinea pigs for testing unproven puberty blocking chemicals.

In South Dakota, there was an attempt to change the law to stop what would, in previous years, have been immediately recognized as dangerous quackery and child abuse. And despite the fact that the South Dakota government is entirely run by Republicans, with staggering majorities in both Houses, the attempt failed when the House passed it but the Senate did not.

https://www.westernjournal.com/south-dakota-senate-bows-l**t-outrage-mob-k**ls-child-sex-change-bill/

And here’s an article from last week, before the bill was defeated, that includes more background about how giving dangerous chemicals to children has become a trendy political crusade, and what it can do to their bodies. Also, what the advocates for this don’t want you to know. Like how Jazz Jennings has been touted as the public face of a healthy t*********r child for years, but we’re only now learning that she suffered severe complications and went through four painful surgeries because years of hormone blockers while still growing caused her sexual organs to develop in ways that the surgeons weren’t sure how to deal with.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/south-dakota-house-passes-bill-to-protect-kids-from-chemical-castration/
There seems to be widespread agreement in liberal ... (show quote)
Any such decisions are not made by the youth themselves or their parents for that matter. They are made with the consultation of Medical Doctors and Psychiatrists and other medical professionals with years of education and experience and they are not done against the will of children or parents.

Reply
Feb 17, 2020 07:51:21   #
Gatsby
 
American Vet wrote:
There seems to be widespread agreement in liberal circles that 18-year-olds are too immature to be trusted with anything dangerous. They want 21 to be the legal age to smoke cigarettes, vape, drunk alcohol or buy a gun.

Yet they will fight to the death to make sure children 16 and younger can decide for themselves whether to have doctors shoot them full of puberty-blocking drugs with unknown potential side-effects on their bodies, if they believe they’re t*********r. We can’t test cosmetics on animals, but we can use our children as guinea pigs for testing unproven puberty blocking chemicals.

In South Dakota, there was an attempt to change the law to stop what would, in previous years, have been immediately recognized as dangerous quackery and child abuse. And despite the fact that the South Dakota government is entirely run by Republicans, with staggering majorities in both Houses, the attempt failed when the House passed it but the Senate did not.

https://www.westernjournal.com/south-dakota-senate-bows-l**t-outrage-mob-k**ls-child-sex-change-bill/

And here’s an article from last week, before the bill was defeated, that includes more background about how giving dangerous chemicals to children has become a trendy political crusade, and what it can do to their bodies. Also, what the advocates for this don’t want you to know. Like how Jazz Jennings has been touted as the public face of a healthy t*********r child for years, but we’re only now learning that she suffered severe complications and went through four painful surgeries because years of hormone blockers while still growing caused her sexual organs to develop in ways that the surgeons weren’t sure how to deal with.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/south-dakota-house-passes-bill-to-protect-kids-from-chemical-castration/
There seems to be widespread agreement in liberal ... (show quote)


Not to worry, I expect this law to be on the b****t, if not in 2020 then in 2022 for sure.

In South Dakota we the v**ers regularly override our legislature.

Reply
 
 
Feb 17, 2020 07:57:00   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
Kevyn wrote:
Any such decisions are not made by the youth themselves or their parents for that matter. They are made with the consultation of Medical Doctors and Psychiatrists and other medical professionals with years of education and experience and they are not done against the will of children or parents.




Well...the psychiatrists have failed miserably....like you have in life. every one of those weird bastards should be culled from the gene pool....and any psychobabblist that says it is not a deeply disturbing mental issue should have their license revoked immediately.......!!

Reply
Feb 17, 2020 08:32:17   #
American Vet
 
Kevyn wrote:
Any such decisions are not made by the youth themselves or their parents for that matter. They are made with the consultation of Medical Doctors and Psychiatrists and other medical professionals with years of education and experience and they are not done against the will of children or parents.


You really need to learn to read and then somehow comprehend what you have read......I feel like I am addressing a 4th grader when trying to teach you complex idea.

Shall I explain the article to you?

Reply
Feb 17, 2020 13:12:23   #
PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco
 
American Vet wrote:
There seems to be widespread agreement in liberal circles that 18-year-olds are too immature to be trusted with anything dangerous. They want 21 to be the legal age to smoke cigarettes, vape, drunk alcohol or buy a gun.

Yet they will fight to the death to make sure children 16 and younger can decide for themselves whether to have doctors shoot them full of puberty-blocking drugs with unknown potential side-effects on their bodies, if they believe they’re t*********r. We can’t test cosmetics on animals, but we can use our children as guinea pigs for testing unproven puberty blocking chemicals.

In South Dakota, there was an attempt to change the law to stop what would, in previous years, have been immediately recognized as dangerous quackery and child abuse. And despite the fact that the South Dakota government is entirely run by Republicans, with staggering majorities in both Houses, the attempt failed when the House passed it but the Senate did not.

https://www.westernjournal.com/south-dakota-senate-bows-l**t-outrage-mob-k**ls-child-sex-change-bill/

And here’s an article from last week, before the bill was defeated, that includes more background about how giving dangerous chemicals to children has become a trendy political crusade, and what it can do to their bodies. Also, what the advocates for this don’t want you to know. Like how Jazz Jennings has been touted as the public face of a healthy t*********r child for years, but we’re only now learning that she suffered severe complications and went through four painful surgeries because years of hormone blockers while still growing caused her sexual organs to develop in ways that the surgeons weren’t sure how to deal with.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/south-dakota-house-passes-bill-to-protect-kids-from-chemical-castration/
There seems to be widespread agreement in liberal ... (show quote)


Just wondering how many t***s kids you have met.

You are arguing about an idea, when the issue concerns real people.

Reply
Feb 17, 2020 13:55:08   #
American Vet
 
PaulPisces wrote:
Just wondering how many t***s kids you have met.

You are arguing about an idea, when the issue concerns real people.


I have met several - both personally and professionally.

The real people involved are suffering a psychiatric disorder called g****r dysphoria. It is described in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).

The unfortunate people need help.

Reply
 
 
Feb 17, 2020 18:40:40   #
PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco
 
American Vet wrote:
I have met several - both personally and professionally.

The real people involved are suffering a psychiatric disorder called g****r dysphoria. It is described in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).

The unfortunate people need help.


Fortunately, the treatment for g****r dysphoria does not involve denying one's identity.

https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/g****r-dysphoria/what-is-g****r-dysphoria

In my experience, the unfortunate ones who need the most help are those that have pre-conceived biases that limit understanding of those different than themselves.

Reply
Feb 17, 2020 19:01:10   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
American Vet wrote:
I have met several - both personally and professionally.

The real people involved are suffering a psychiatric disorder called g****r dysphoria. It is described in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).

The unfortunate people need help.



Reply
Feb 17, 2020 19:04:07   #
PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco
 
I think Edith got it right.



Reply
Feb 18, 2020 05:54:10   #
American Vet
 
PaulPisces wrote:
Fortunately, the treatment for g****r dysphoria does not involve denying one's identity.

https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/g****r-dysphoria/what-is-g****r-dysphoria

In my experience, the unfortunate ones who need the most help are those that have pre-conceived biases that limit understanding of those different than themselves.


Define 'identity' - One is born male or female.

No one has the right to force their 'preferences' on others: You don't have the right to use the female restroom; you don't have the right to run in track meets against girls; and you certainly don't have the right to force me to use your preferences in "pronouns'.

You seem to think - as l*****t do - that only YOU understand those who are different. You choose not to believe that another person can evaluate, and then reject, those beliefs that you hold dear.

Reply
 
 
Feb 18, 2020 17:21:19   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
American Vet wrote:
There seems to be widespread agreement in liberal circles that 18-year-olds are too immature to be trusted with anything dangerous. They want 21 to be the legal age to smoke cigarettes, vape, drunk alcohol or buy a gun.

Yet they will fight to the death to make sure children 16 and younger can decide for themselves whether to have doctors shoot them full of puberty-blocking drugs with unknown potential side-effects on their bodies, if they believe they’re t*********r. We can’t test cosmetics on animals, but we can use our children as guinea pigs for testing unproven puberty blocking chemicals.

In South Dakota, there was an attempt to change the law to stop what would, in previous years, have been immediately recognized as dangerous quackery and child abuse. And despite the fact that the South Dakota government is entirely run by Republicans, with staggering majorities in both Houses, the attempt failed when the House passed it but the Senate did not.

https://www.westernjournal.com/south-dakota-senate-bows-l**t-outrage-mob-k**ls-child-sex-change-bill/

And here’s an article from last week, before the bill was defeated, that includes more background about how giving dangerous chemicals to children has become a trendy political crusade, and what it can do to their bodies. Also, what the advocates for this don’t want you to know. Like how Jazz Jennings has been touted as the public face of a healthy t*********r child for years, but we’re only now learning that she suffered severe complications and went through four painful surgeries because years of hormone blockers while still growing caused her sexual organs to develop in ways that the surgeons weren’t sure how to deal with.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/south-dakota-house-passes-bill-to-protect-kids-from-chemical-castration/
There seems to be widespread agreement in liberal ... (show quote)


Can't test mine, I put her where nobody can find her.

Reply
Feb 18, 2020 17:24:02   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
Well...the psychiatrists have failed miserably....like you have in life. every one of those weird bastards should be culled from the gene pool....and any psychobabblist that says it is not a deeply disturbing mental issue should have their license revoked immediately.......!!


The psychiatrist I worked with concluded it's a damn fad. Only i***ts and the weak of mind go for it.

Reply
Feb 18, 2020 17:25:19   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
American Vet wrote:
You really need to learn to read and then somehow comprehend what you have read......I feel like I am addressing a 4th grader when trying to teach you complex idea.

Shall I explain the article to you?


It won't do any good, he'll still misunderstand.

Reply
Feb 18, 2020 18:00:54   #
roy
 
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
Well...the psychiatrists have failed miserably....like you have in life. every one of those weird bastards should be culled from the gene pool....and any psychobabblist that says it is not a deeply disturbing mental issue should have their license revoked immediately.......!!


What should it matter to you what a person wants to be,if they don't bother you..Funny haven't seen much about anything on opp today about all the boy scouts being molested by their by their good conservative leaders.But I'm sure when their brought up on charges and put in prison,thump will pardon,because their trumps type of men

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.