One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Jury Foreman in Roger Stone case was anti-Trump and should of never been picked as a juror , much less Forman of the jury!!!
Page <prev 2 of 2
Feb 13, 2020 22:33:27   #
Fodaoson Loc: South Texas
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
That's brutal...

There are certainly folk out there who neither wholeheartedly support Trump nor despise him with their every breath...


For every case of Trump derangement syndrome there is a case of Obama derangement syndrome and Clinton Derangement syndrome. Many of the accusations are not real ,but are results of the other DR.

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 22:40:23   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Fodaoson wrote:
For every case of Trump derangement syndrome there is a case of Obama derangement syndrome and Clinton Derangement syndrome. Many of the accusations are not real ,but are results of the other DR.


I agree somewhat!! However I believe that there are way more TDS,than I in case of Obama or Hillary!!!

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 22:54:32   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
proud republican wrote:
I doubt it,but I may be wrong on that!! There is so much h**e toward this President that finding impartial anything where Trump is concerned is pretty much impossible!!!!!
Let's back it up a bit.

AG Barr was investigating malpractice in the prosecution of Stone. From what I just heard about that, it is no freaking wonder that four prosecutors on that case got the hell out of there. Two of them were lead investigators for Mueller.

Based on information he had at the time of this latest l*****t brouhaha, AG Barr was already prepared to challenge the penalty phase where a federal judge really really really screwed the legal pooch. She pronounced the penalty almost as soon as she banged the gavel. The penalty was so extremely severe compared to the crime that it threw up many red f**gs questioning the entire prosecution.

President Trump DID NOT sick AG Barr onto the court to save Stone's ass. AG Barr went after the fraudulent prosecution. You know, like draining the fking swamp.

Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2020 23:33:57   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Let's back it up a bit.

AG Barr was investigating malpractice in the prosecution of Stone. From what I just heard about that, it is no freaking wonder that four prosecutors on that case got the hell out of there. Two of them were lead investigators for Mueller.

Based on information he had at the time of this latest l*****t brouhaha, AG Barr was already prepared to challenge the penalty phase where a federal judge really really really screwed the legal pooch. She pronounced the penalty almost as soon as she banged the gavel. The penalty was so extremely severe compared to the crime that it threw up many red f**gs questioning the entire prosecution.

President Trump DID NOT sick AG Barr onto the court to save Stone's ass. AG Barr went after the fraudulent prosecution. You know, like draining the fking swamp.
Let's back it up a bit. br br AG Barr was invest... (show quote)


I never said that Trump sick AG Barr to court to save Stone!!

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 00:12:04   #
PeterS
 
proud republican wrote:
Yes justice SHOULD be blind!!! Unfortunately when it comes to Trump justice is anything but blind!!! 9 years for lying to Congress from a person who never been in trouble with the law,justice is NOT blind,it's crooked!!!

He threatened to have a witness k**led! That's what the 9 years were for. And you forget that Stone had his own defense team. Are you suggesting they were so incompetent that they couldn't pick a jury or argue a case? You people play the bias card every time you open your mouth. Well, people have bias but that doesn't mean they can't be objective and fair. If you threaten to have a witness k**led and impede congress there are consequences. If you don't want to pay those consequences then don't commit the crime!

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 00:13:01   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
proud republican wrote:
I never said that Trump sick AG Barr to court to save Stone!!
I never said you did.

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 00:29:42   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
PeterS wrote:
He threatened to have a witness k**led! That's what the 9 years were for. And you forget that Stone had his own defense team. Are you suggesting they were so incompetent that they couldn't pick a jury or argue a case? You people play the bias card every time you open your mouth. Well, people have bias but that doesn't mean they can't be objective and fair. If you threaten to have a witness k**led and impede congress there are consequences. If you don't want to pay those consequences then don't commit the crime!
He threatened to have a witness k**led! That's wha... (show quote)
9 years for making references to "The Godfather" and threatening to kidnap a witness's therapy dog? Stone made no direct death threat or even hinted that he would have the witness k**led. People say the damnedest things when they are frightened and angry.

Stone's defense, in and out of the courtroom, may have been questionable, but it cannot compare with the prosecutorial malfeasance in this case.

Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2020 00:35:26   #
PeterS
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Let's back it up a bit.

AG Barr was investigating malpractice in the prosecution of Stone. From what I just heard about that, it is no freaking wonder that four prosecutors on that case got the hell out of there. Two of them were lead investigators for Mueller.

Based on information he had at the time of this latest l*****t brouhaha, AG Barr was already prepared to challenge the penalty phase where a federal judge really really really screwed the legal pooch. She pronounced the penalty almost as soon as she banged the gavel. The penalty was so extremely severe compared to the crime that it threw up many red f**gs questioning the entire prosecution.

President Trump DID NOT sick AG Barr onto the court to save Stone's ass. AG Barr went after the fraudulent prosecution. You know, like draining the fking swamp.
Let's back it up a bit. br br AG Barr was invest... (show quote)

And where did you hear this load of BS? Would you happen to have a link or is this something one of your talking heads thought up for you? And tell me, what is the usual penalty for witness tampering by threatening to have a witness k**led?

From Find Law, Federal Witness tampering:Federal witness intimidation is punishable by up to 20 years in federal prison and a fine of up to $250,000. Using physical force to intimidate a federal witness results in a federal prison sentence of up to 30 years.

Your insistence on having someone else think for you Blade is going to be your undoing. Trump isn't draining the swamp--HE IS THE FRICKING SWAMP!

Roger Stone guilty of witness tampering, lying to Congress

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 00:52:37   #
PeterS
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
9 years for making references to "The Godfather" and threatening to kidnap a witness's therapy dog? Stone made no direct death threat or even hinted that he would have the witness k**led. People say the damnedest things when they are frightened and angry.

Stone's defense, in and out of the courtroom, may have been questionable, but it cannot compare with the prosecutorial malfeasance in this case.

Yes, which is why it wasn't very smart of Stone to try to frighten a witness. And if Stone's defense was questionable that was Stones fault, not the prosecutors, nor anyone else.

As for the prosecutors, they prosecuted their case and won. What malfeasance did they commit? And you didn't give me your link to my prior question and now I would like a link where there is proof of prosecutorial malfeasance. If you can make the accusation than I am sure you have something to prove that accusation or is this all something coming out of Rush Limbaughs ass?

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 01:20:12   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
PeterS wrote:
And where did you hear this load of BS? Would you happen to have a link or is this something one of your talking heads thought up for you? And tell me, what is the usual penalty for witness tampering by threatening to have a witness k**led?

From Find Law, Federal Witness tampering:Federal witness intimidation is punishable by up to 20 years in federal prison and a fine of up to $250,000. Using physical force to intimidate a federal witness results in a federal prison sentence of up to 30 years.

Your insistence on having someone else think for you Blade is going to be your undoing. Trump isn't draining the swamp--HE IS THE FRICKING SWAMP!

Roger Stone guilty of witness tampering, lying to Congress
And where did you hear this load of BS? Would you ... (show quote)
Yeah, Stone was found guilty, the prosecution made damn sure of that. Two of the prosecutors were investigators on the Mueller team.

You can dispense with the notion that I don't think for myself when posting here. How many times have you posted links, articles, memes and other sources to bring your message aboard? How many times have you opened a thread with one word --- YUP! --- followed by a meme or some other l*****t bulls**t?

When it comes to Christians and Christianity, you find all kinds of sources to do your screaming for you.

FYI: my sources begin with the DOJ

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 01:58:29   #
PeterS
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Yeah, Stone was found guilty, the prosecution made damn sure of that. Two of the prosecutors were investigators on the Mueller team.

You can dispense with the notion that I don't think for myself when posting here. How many times have you posted links, articles, memes and other sources to bring your message aboard? How many times have you opened a thread with one word --- YUP! --- followed by a meme or some other l*****t bulls**t?

When it comes to Christians and Christianity, you find all kinds of sources to do your screaming for you.

FYI: my sources begin with the DOJ
Yeah, Stone was found guilty, the prosecution made... (show quote)

Oh come now, you haven't even been able to figure out that the Stone investigation was part of the Mueller report? Why do you think there were Mueller investigators investigating Stone? You've been running around screaming about Mueller investigators without even being able to connect that Stone was one of the last cases to be tried as part of the Mueller investigation. The DoJ my ass. You let the Limbaughs, Hannity's, and Levins of the right-wing world do your thinking for you and that's why you can't even understand the obvious!

As for using a meme to start a thread, that's only a problem if they are wrong or perpetuating a lie. 99% of the attacks on those threads are at me not the content of the meme so it's impossible to tell from your argument whether the memes are wrong or right. You can't attack the memes because the meme shows a flaw or defect in your oh so corrupt president or your fallacy driven Christian conservative world. The only thing you people know how to do is attack the messenger, not the message because to attack the message you have to be able to think for yourselves and until logical fallacies become actual thought that just ain't going to happen...YUP!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.