One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Q Questions
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Feb 14, 2020 12:49:43   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
kemmer wrote:
Q-anon is becoming a dangerous d******c t*******t org. One of many being given tacit approval in the Trump era.


We needed a counterweight to socialists, f*****ts, and the loony left.

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 12:54:04   #
Eastern OZ Loc: With the wizard.
 
Peewee wrote:
We needed a counterweight to socialists, f*****ts, and the loony left.


And Q might not be enough.

At the rate the demwit dynasty is going it might take the whole alphabet.

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 13:05:36   #
kemmer
 
Owl32 wrote:
THIS is THE REVIVAL, THE RETURN 0F GOD TO OUR DAILY LIFE. FEAR NOT GOD IS WITH US.

Thank you, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khomenei!

Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2020 14:29:52   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
[quote=ACP45]Whether or not you are a Q follower, believer, or cynic. Consider carefully the questions raised in this post.

What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations?
What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology?
What happens when the news is no longer free from bias?
What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent?
What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy?
What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party?
Fact becomes fiction?
Fiction becomes fact?
When does news become propaganda?
Identity creation?
How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?
Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?
Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?
‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].
[If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true]
Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?
Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?
Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources?
Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?
Threat to intellectual freedom?
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Read again – digest.
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Logical thinking.
Why, after the e******n of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] d******e blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of e******n, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, r****m, every other ‘ism’?
Pre/post 2016 e******n?
Why were violent [masked] terror orgs such as A****a immediately created/funded?
Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/g****r, race, [ism]?
When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative.
Control of the narrative = power
When you are blind, what do you see?
They want you divided.
Divided by religion.
Divided by sex.
Divided by political affiliation.
Divided by class.
When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers].
Divided you are weak.
Divided you pose no threat to their control.
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & T***SPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep].
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding t***h should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.[/quote]



Great post my friend,

I've been saying (with open criticism by others) that the media is not protected under the first Amendment, when said media is fabricating, blatantly lying, coercion with other media and a political party (left) with an agenda to falsely form public opinion to the end of successfully fulfilling an agenda.
The media has trampled the first amendment and guilty of crimes ignored by the FTC (police of the media). The FTC liken to the EPA has no oversight on it's opertions by the Justice department and has ignored
It's purpose and service to the American people. The FTC has ignored every violation of the media, just as it ignores the Xrated content it places in front of viewers on Network TV that works alongside of the media in forming public opinion and social norms.
The left (Congress and Senate, Media, Hollywood, FTC, ) have networked the radicals lefts agenda and using these arms to establish a one party system through brainwashing the American public to believe false narratives, accepting of anti-Christian narratives, accepting of vitriolic h**e, accepting of social a*********ns (L***Q), accepting of "Humanism " each having their own moral/ethical compass separated from any uniform standards of right from wrong, accepting that the constitution is outdated, accepting that leaders breaking the law and allowing treasonous acts is acceptable ( o*******wing a duly elected president) if the end justifies the means, accepting violence against anyone that disagrees with the radical ideology, policies or agenda.
The l*****t agenda has fallen into Biblical definitions and no longer is our Republic about two parties fighting for different values, for the American people but instead has become a battle of light against Darkness, God against Satan, good against evil.
The left plots in private, in dark chambers it's evil doings....


God will reveal the evil doings. Watch what God brings to the light in 2020, how God uses Trump to purge our government evil's and corruption

God Bless America,
God Bless Israel,
God Bless and protect President Trump,
Jack

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 15:19:00   #
kemmer
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
Great post my friend,

I've been saying (with open criticism by others) that the media is not protected under the first Amendment, when said media is fabricating, blatantly lying, coercion with other media and a political party (left) with an agenda to falsely form public opinion to the end of successfully fulfilling an agenda.
The media has trampled the first amendment and guilty of crimes ignored by the FTC (police of the media). The FTC liken to the EPA has no oversight on it's opertions by the Justice department and has ignored
It's purpose and service to the American people. The FTC has ignored every violation of the media, just as it ignores the Xrated content it places in front of viewers on Network TV that works alongside of the media in forming public opinion and social norms.
The left (Congress and Senate, Media, Hollywood, FTC, ) have networked the radicals lefts agenda and using these arms to establish a one party system through brainwashing the American public to believe false narratives, accepting of anti-Christian narratives, accepting of vitriolic h**e, accepting of social a*********ns (L***Q), accepting of "Humanism " each having their own moral/ethical compass separated from any uniform standards of right from wrong, accepting that the constitution is outdated, accepting that leaders breaking the law and allowing treasonous acts is acceptable ( o*******wing a duly elected president) if the end justifies the means, accepting violence against anyone that disagrees with the radical ideology, policies or agenda.
The l*****t agenda has fallen into Biblical definitions and no longer is our Republic about two parties fighting for different values, for the American people but instead has become a battle of light against Darkness, God against Satan, good against evil.
The left plots in private, in dark chambers it's evil doings....


God will reveal the evil doings. Watch what God brings to the light in 2020, how God uses Trump to purge our government evil's and corruption

God Bless America,
God Bless Israel,
God Bless and protect President Trump,
Jack
Great post my friend, br br I've been saying (w... (show quote)

What a pile of stinking pig swill.

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 15:27:19   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
Great post my friend,

I've been saying (with open criticism by others) that the media is not protected under the first Amendment, when said media is fabricating, blatantly lying, coercion with other media and a political party (left) with an agenda to falsely form public opinion to the end of successfully fulfilling an agenda.
The media has trampled the first amendment and guilty of crimes ignored by the FTC (police of the media). The FTC liken to the EPA has no oversight on it's opertions by the Justice department and has ignored
It's purpose and service to the American people. The FTC has ignored every violation of the media, just as it ignores the Xrated content it places in front of viewers on Network TV that works alongside of the media in forming public opinion and social norms.
The left (Congress and Senate, Media, Hollywood, FTC, ) have networked the radicals lefts agenda and using these arms to establish a one party system through brainwashing the American public to believe false narratives, accepting of anti-Christian narratives, accepting of vitriolic h**e, accepting of social a*********ns (L***Q), accepting of "Humanism " each having their own moral/ethical compass separated from any uniform standards of right from wrong, accepting that the constitution is outdated, accepting that leaders breaking the law and allowing treasonous acts is acceptable ( o*******wing a duly elected president) if the end justifies the means, accepting violence against anyone that disagrees with the radical ideology, policies or agenda.
The l*****t agenda has fallen into Biblical definitions and no longer is our Republic about two parties fighting for different values, for the American people but instead has become a battle of light against Darkness, God against Satan, good against evil.
The left plots in private, in dark chambers it's evil doings....


God will reveal the evil doings. Watch what God brings to the light in 2020, how God uses Trump to purge our government evil's and corruption

God Bless America,
God Bless Israel,
God Bless and protect President Trump,
Jack
Great post my friend, br br I've been saying (w... (show quote)



Reply
Feb 14, 2020 15:28:08   #
trashbaum
 
Owl32 wrote:
America has started the way back to FREEDOM and LIBERTY for ALL MEN. The PEOPLE are having their POWER RETURNED! Praise GOD! WE THE PEOPLE NOW CONTROL THE NEWS!


Who in the world told you that? CNN?

Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2020 15:30:32   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
trashbaum wrote:
Who in the world told you that? CNN?


Link plz.

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 15:35:24   #
trashbaum
 
Peewee wrote:
Link plz.


If you believe "we the people now control the news" A link is not going to do you any good.

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 15:36:57   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
EN Submarine Qualified wrote:
Certainly not versed in corporate law and regulations but I am sure there are standards in place that govern the written and broadcast media which are being laughed at and certainly not enforced.
I have written to President Trump asking him to see that standards are in place and adhered to.


The FCC Regulations Apply~~Under freedom of Speech while the FCC governs, the broadcasters are charged with accuracy of the articles published...

Look under consumer guides but I will remind you, the FCC is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on the First amendment...

If they materially cause harm to the general public, harm theory, then they can be held accountable but it must be immediate and false information...

This is why they must be sued and loose in order to go after their license...

https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/public-and-broadcasting

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 15:40:39   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
kemmer wrote:
Q-anon is becoming a dangerous d******c t*******t org. One of many being given tacit approval in the Trump era.
Everyone who refuses to sell their souls to the Demoprog Devil is a terrorist.

.



Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2020 16:14:43   #
Big dog
 
[quote=ACP45]Whether or not you are a Q follower, believer, or cynic. Consider carefully the questions raised in this post.

What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations?
What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology?
What happens when the news is no longer free from bias?
What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent?
What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy?
What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party?
Fact becomes fiction?
Fiction becomes fact?
When does news become propaganda?
Identity creation?
How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?
Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?
Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?
‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].
[If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true]
Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?
Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?
Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources?
Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?
Threat to intellectual freedom?
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Read again – digest.
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Logical thinking.
Why, after the e******n of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] d******e blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of e******n, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, r****m, every other ‘ism’?
Pre/post 2016 e******n?
Why were violent [masked] terror orgs such as A****a immediately created/funded?
Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/g****r, race, [ism]?
When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative.
Control of the narrative = power
When you are blind, what do you see?
They want you divided.
Divided by religion.
Divided by sex.
Divided by political affiliation.
Divided by class.
When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers].
Divided you are weak.
Divided you pose no threat to their control.
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & T***SPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep].
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding t***h should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.[/quote]

Hence the reason for the 2nd amendment.

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 16:17:43   #
Owl32 Loc: ARK
 
kemmer wrote:
What a pile of stinking pig swill.


Just hold on Kemmer they will get to you soon enough to give you a 2nd chance!

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 16:20:36   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
[quote=ACP45]Whether or not you are a Q follower, believer, or cynic. Consider carefully the questions raised in this post.

What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations?
What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology?
What happens when the news is no longer free from bias?
What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent?
What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy?
What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party?
Fact becomes fiction?
Fiction becomes fact?
When does news become propaganda?
Identity creation?
How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?
Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?
Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?
‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].
[If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true]
Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?
Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?
Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources?
Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?
Threat to intellectual freedom?
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Read again – digest.
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Logical thinking.
Why, after the e******n of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] d******e blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of e******n, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, r****m, every other ‘ism’?
Pre/post 2016 e******n?
Why were violent [masked] terror orgs such as A****a immediately created/funded?
Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/g****r, race, [ism]?
When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative.
Control of the narrative = power
When you are blind, what do you see?
They want you divided.
Divided by religion.
Divided by sex.
Divided by political affiliation.
Divided by class.
When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers].
Divided you are weak.
Divided you pose no threat to their control.
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & T***SPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep].
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding t***h should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.[/quote]

Yes, but not to the Republic, there is a big difference.

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 16:27:17   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
Dwight Logan wrote:
This is most salient summary of this subject I have ever read. For years I have said and written articles that have said that "there should be freedom of the press, but it should be freedom with responsibility. There also should be freedom from the press."
I would love to hear your input about how we can cure this terminal cancer.


Really too late now. If you want to try, determine which are giving you real info. and which lies. Leave the lies out. Some will choose Daily Kos whereas Others Washington times or the Hill. Does it answer who, what, where, when, why and how? Old newspapers used to. And not the Daily Planet.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.