One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
What Does Your Common Sense Tell You About A Barr Fix On The Stone Prosecution?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Feb 13, 2020 14:48:31   #
kemmer
 
buddy42 wrote:
Did you even read it Anus Mouth?

Hah! Like you did, bozo!

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 14:58:07   #
buddy42 Loc: Bonita Springs, Fl
 
kemmer wrote:
Hah! Like you did, bozo!



I read every word and understood it. Try reading it before opening your diarrhea mouth.
At least read about the type of biased jurists they had for his trial. It was fixed.

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 19:22:27   #
Seth
 
kemmer wrote:
7 to 9 years is in the statute guidelines for the crimes Stone has been CONVICTED of. But Trump wants his old buddy sprung, so Billy Barr is "fixing" it.
As far as Trump's concerned, Billy Barr's sole function is to protect Trump, his family, and his buddies; and to invent charges against Trump's enemies.


The biggest hole in your argument is that President Trump could simply pardon Stone if he wanted to interfere.

Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2020 19:34:37   #
Mikeyavelli
 
woodguru wrote:
This is actually escalating faster than can be kept up with, trump thanks Barr for "taking over" the prosecution of Stone, thentweets an actually impeachably wrong statement that he as president can oversee and direct the DOJ as far as who and how they prosecute anyone he wants.

He is so wrong about the role the president plays with the DOJ it is literally impeachable. His premise would then conclude that it is up to the president who he tells the DOJ not to investigate or prosecute, which we knew, I just didn't thing trump could possibly be stupid enough to come out and say it.

If you believe I am wrong you just go back to the freakout republicans had when Clinton, the husband of a p**********l candidate met with the then current AG Lynch on the tarmac. The extreme reaction led to Lynch recusing herself from any of the Hillary issues the DOJ was looking at, a concept this administration and Barr does not get.

The president is to have zero interactions with the AG. Any suggestions or input from the white house is supposed to go through above board white house legal channels.

Barr cannot conduct DOJ business in the non partisan manner required when he is responding directly to the orders of trump
This is actually escalating faster than can be kep... (show quote)

Relax, Bush Boy Barr is one of yours. Whom has Bush Boy Barr indicted?
No one.

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 20:56:57   #
Navigator
 
DASHY wrote:
It is not pure fiction that Donald Trump was, in fact, IMPEACHED by the Congress of the United States.


Try harder to be accurate. President Trump was not impeached by congress, he was impeached by the House of Representative where the Democrats outnumber the Republicans by about 20%.

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 21:07:16   #
Navigator
 
woodguru wrote:
This is actually escalating faster than can be kept up with, trump thanks Barr for "taking over" the prosecution of Stone, thentweets an actually impeachably wrong statement that he as president can oversee and direct the DOJ as far as who and how they prosecute anyone he wants.

He is so wrong about the role the president plays with the DOJ it is literally impeachable. His premise would then conclude that it is up to the president who he tells the DOJ not to investigate or prosecute, which we knew, I just didn't thing trump could possibly be stupid enough to come out and say it.

If you believe I am wrong you just go back to the freakout republicans had when Clinton, the husband of a p**********l candidate met with the then current AG Lynch on the tarmac. The extreme reaction led to Lynch recusing herself from any of the Hillary issues the DOJ was looking at, a concept this administration and Barr does not get.

The president is to have zero interactions with the AG. Any suggestions or input from the white house is supposed to go through above board white house legal channels.

Barr cannot conduct DOJ business in the non partisan manner required when he is responding directly to the orders of trump
This is actually escalating faster than can be kep... (show quote)


While it may not be politically wise or even in the best interests of the country, it is absolutely within the constitutional authority of the President to direct the DOJ to prosecute someone or to not prosecute someone. Many members of the MSM are incorrect when they say this is interfering in the judicial process. The DOJ is not part of the Judiciary, it is part of the Executive department, headed by the President. The courts are part of the judiciary and it is the courts who decide whether someone is actually convicted, sentenced or exonerated. The President has no authority whatsoever over the judiciary

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 22:31:57   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Navigator wrote:
While it may not be politically wise or even in the best interests of the country, it is absolutely within the constitutional authority of the President to direct the DOJ to prosecute someone or to not prosecute someone. Many members of the MSM are incorrect when they say this is interfering in the judicial process. The DOJ is not part of the Judiciary, it is part of the Executive department, headed by the President. The courts are part of the judiciary and it is the courts who decide whether someone is actually convicted, sentenced or exonerated. The President has no authority whatsoever over the judiciary
While it may not be politically wise or even in th... (show quote)

Exactly, and the DOJ top dog bit Trump on the hand today.
Look for a new Attorney General! Thank you, this one did nothing but talk.

Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2020 22:44:54   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
woodguru wrote:
This is actually escalating faster than can be kept up with, trump thanks Barr for "taking over" the prosecution of Stone, thentweets an actually impeachably wrong statement that he as president can oversee and direct the DOJ as far as who and how they prosecute anyone he wants.

He is so wrong about the role the president plays with the DOJ it is literally impeachable. His premise would then conclude that it is up to the president who he tells the DOJ not to investigate or prosecute, which we knew, I just didn't thing trump could possibly be stupid enough to come out and say it.

If you believe I am wrong you just go back to the freakout republicans had when Clinton, the husband of a p**********l candidate met with the then current AG Lynch on the tarmac. The extreme reaction led to Lynch recusing herself from any of the Hillary issues the DOJ was looking at, a concept this administration and Barr does not get.

The president is to have zero interactions with the AG. Any suggestions or input from the white house is supposed to go through above board white house legal channels.

Barr cannot conduct DOJ business in the non partisan manner required when he is responding directly to the orders of trump
This is actually escalating faster than can be kep... (show quote)
AG Barr was investigating malpractice in the prosecution of Stone. From what I just heard about that, it is no freaking wonder that four prosecutors on that case got the hell out of there. Two of them were lead investigators for Mueller.

Based on information he had at the time, AG Barr was already prepared to challenge the penalty phase where a federal judge really really really screwed the legal pooch. She pronounced the penalty almost as soon as she banged the gavel. The penalty was so extremely severe compared to the crime that it threw up many red f**gs questioning the entire prosecution.

President Trump DID NOT sick AG Barr onto the court to save Stone's ass. AG Barr went after the fraudulent prosecution. You know, like draining the fking swamp.

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 22:56:44   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
AG Barr was investigating malpractice in the prosecution of Stone. From what I just heard about that, it is no freaking wonder that four prosecutors on that case got the hell out of there. Two of them were lead investigators for Mueller.

Based on information he had at the time, AG Barr was already prepared to challenge the penalty phase where a federal judge really really really screwed the legal pooch. She pronounced the penalty almost as soon as she banged the gavel. The penalty was so extremely severe compared to the crime that it threw up many red f**gs questioning the entire prosecution.

President Trump DID NOT sick AG Barr onto the court to save Stone's ass. AG Barr went after the fraudulent prosecution. You know, like draining the fking swamp.
AG Barr was investigating malpractice in the prose... (show quote)


Bush Boy Barr is the swamp. He nipped at the hand that feeds him today. Trump has to be as disappointed in Bush Boy Barr as he was with Loretta Sessions. Bush Boy Barr hasn't stopped anyone from the treasons going on to harrass and remove Trump from office.
Whom has Bush Boy Barr indicted?
No one.

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 23:20:53   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Bush Boy Barr is the swamp. He nipped at the hand that feeds him today. Trump has to be as disappointed in Bush Boy Barr as he was with Loretta Sessions. Bush Boy Barr hasn't stopped anyone from the treasons going on to harrass and remove Trump from office.
Whom has Bush Boy Barr indicted?
No one.
Save that opinion for somebody who gives a s**t, okay?

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 23:30:19   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Save that opinion for somebody who gives a s**t, okay?


Maybe I missed the news that Bush Boy Barr indicted Comey. McCabe? Strzdk? Priestap? Page? Clapper? Brennan? Anyone?
Enlighten me, then, on the merits of Bush Boy Barr.
I've seen nothing, not even mild criticism for the assassins going about their business of removing Trump from office.
But you have seen things that inspire confidence in Bush Boy Barr.
Do you need secret Bush Boy Barr Glasses to see it?

Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2020 00:31:28   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Maybe I missed the news that Bush Boy Barr indicted Comey. McCabe? Strzdk? Priestap? Page? Clapper? Brennan? Anyone?
Enlighten me, then, on the merits of Bush Boy Barr.
I've seen nothing, not even mild criticism for the assassins going about their business of removing Trump from office.
But you have seen things that inspire confidence in Bush Boy Barr.
Do you need secret Bush Boy Barr Glasses to see it?
Meh!

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 00:56:43   #
EconomistDon
 
Kevyn wrote:
More of the third world bananarepublican criminality the Pumpkinfuhrer is known for.


Where was your anger and disgust when Obama instructed Holder, Comey, and Lynch to not prosecute Hillary? She was actually guilty of four felonies. Stone was guilty of a coerced lie. How is a coerced lie worth 9 years in prison, or ANY prison. Stone and his wife were d**gged from their bed in a predawn hour and paraded in front of CNN cameras for maximum humiliation. Their house was torn apart hoping to find something, anything incriminating. When nothing was found, Stone was interrogated for 72 hours, trying to get a contradiction that they could call a lie. Well they got one and want to send him to jail for it. This was all done in an effort to GET Trump.

Kevy, this was a treasonous c**p attempt. Treason has consequences.

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 09:37:25   #
Mikeyavelli
 
EconomistDon wrote:
Where was your anger and disgust when Obama instructed Holder, Comey, and Lynch to not prosecute Hillary? She was actually guilty of four felonies. Stone was guilty of a coerced lie. How is a coerced lie worth 9 years in prison, or ANY prison. Stone and his wife were d**gged from their bed in a predawn hour and paraded in front of CNN cameras for maximum humiliation. Their house was torn apart hoping to find something, anything incriminating. When nothing was found, Stone was interrogated for 72 hours, trying to get a contradiction that they could call a lie. Well they got one and want to send him to jail for it. This was all done in an effort to GET Trump.

Kevy, this was a treasonous c**p attempt. Treason has consequences.
Where was your anger and disgust when Obama instru... (show quote)

Treason has no consequences as long as Bush Boy Barr is Attorney General.

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 11:23:10   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Treason has no consequences as long as Bush Boy Barr is Attorney General.


We will see how things go when Durham finishes his work. If Barr doesn't act then we can believe you are correct, maybe. We will see. I don't see Barr as someone who acts prematurely. And he did openly say that there was spying going on, did he not?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.