One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trumps befuddled moral compass...
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Feb 12, 2020 12:34:30   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Kevyn wrote:
Do me a favor sister, keep your homoerotic masturbatory fantasies to yourself. This is a place to discuss politics not spill the perverse content of your sick mind.

Yet you do it all the time HYPOCRITE!

Reply
Feb 12, 2020 12:51:23   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
Parky60 wrote:
Yet you do it all the time HYPOCRITE!




In real life, he just doesn't talk about it....he lives that

Reply
Feb 12, 2020 13:05:19   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Kevyn wrote:
Do me a favor sister, keep your homoerotic masturbatory fantasies to yourself. This is a place to discuss politics not spill the perverse content of your sick mind.

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

Reply
 
 
Feb 12, 2020 13:08:01   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Kevyn wrote:
Trump is on tape before an audience of thousands on the Howard Stern show saying basically the same thing. He is a vulgar creeper with a long history of being so.


Total BS. And Trump never ever said this either. Just how low do you h**ers go?? It's stuff like this that makes us want to finish the entire democrat party once and for all. And, it seems to be happening.

Reply
Feb 12, 2020 14:53:33   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
PeterS wrote:
My moral compass, well not lusting after my own daughter. As for Trump. Republicans refused to hear witnesses because they would have shown Trump guilty and they wouldn't have any cover for acquitting him. That's not what people with a moral compass do Blade. We are supposed to be a nation based on the rule of law and when you piss all over that to acquit someone who is guilty that's about as amoral as you can get! Too bad it's impossible for you to see that...
Such a shameless butchery of the t***h, Pete, I don't think a moral compass would do you much good.

The Rule of Law in America presumes an accused to be innocent until proven guilty. Assumption of guilt without due process is in direct defiance of the rule of law.

The impeachment of a POTUS is a constitutional political process.
Congress is not a criminal court.

Republicans did not refuse to hear witnesses. Republicans on the HIC and HJC heard 18 witnesses, all of whom were supposedly pro-impeachment witnesses selected by the chairmen of those committees. Republicans were prohibited from calling any defense or opposition witnesses into Schiff's star chamber sessions, they were not allowed to introduce any documents, testimonials, or witness depositions.

This is where Schiff and Nadler really screwed the pooch. In prohibiting defense witnesses and documentation from being presented during their secret sessions, those fools had little or no idea of what the defense even looked like. They were totally unprepared to face the music in the senate.

Moreover, in establishing articles of impeachment, Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler & Co. essentially ignored Article V and amended Article I, Section 4 to read wh**ever high Crimes and Misdemeanors we can come up with.

Abuse of power? Every president beginning with George Washington has abused his power to one degree or other.

Obstruction of congress? Every president beginning with George Washington has obstructed congress to one degree or other.

After a 30 day delay, when N**i Pelosi & Klan solemnly, with great reverence, as if they were t***sporting the Holy Grail on a silk pillow, marched these two traffic tickets into the senate, it was quite obvious the senate Republicans and the president's defense team did not need to hear any more witnesses.

The only ones who got pissed on were those demoprog maniacs who started this partisan fiasco.

Reply
Feb 12, 2020 17:17:39   #
JW
 
Kevyn wrote:
Trump is on tape before an audience of thousands on the Howard Stern show saying basically the same thing. He is a vulgar creeper with a long history of being so.


I've heard that tape and Trump said nothing. Stern did the talking. All Trump did was demur and concede to Stern's vulgarity. The driver was Stern, not Trump. There is no proof that Trump ever said anything remotely close to that.

Reply
Feb 12, 2020 17:33:47   #
JW
 
PeterS wrote:
It is probably coming from the quote he made on Stern about how he wished Ivanka wasn't his daughter so he could bang her. Trump has made several lude comments about Ivanka in public and privately he was attracted to women who remained him of his daughter. And why would it matter what he said about his daughter? You cons have already shown that you don't care about Trump's moral character. He could rape Ivanka in the Oval Office and you cons wouldn't blink an eye. I just enjoy showing just how far you have fallen all for the sake of political power.

As for being embarrassed for me. You are the ones who have given up all moral bearing for the sake of political power. You can't get more shameful than that. You have 15 qualified men, all with impeccable moral character, and you chose the one who had the morality of a pig. There is nothing I could post that would come close to showing how disgraceful you cons have become all for the sake of achieving political power.
It is probably coming from the quote he made on St... (show quote)


That is not what he said on Stern's program. Stern put him on the spot by saying his daughter "was a Great looking piece of ass". Trump said repeatedly that he regarded Ivanka as "beautiful". Stern called her a piece of ass and pushed Trump into agreeing. He agreed reluctantly. He was obviously being pushed.

As for why we support Trump, we would very much like to see something resembling the United States of America survive on this continent, not see it turned into an autocratic nanny state more resembling the failed soviet state or Venezuela with the added confusion of which bathroom to use and a pliable sexual definition. Bottom line on Trump's support; we will support him and anyone else who will put a stop to your kind of political animal. If you think the support he gets depends on him, you are very much mistaken.

Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2020 05:23:21   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
PeterS wrote:
Maybe you Christian Conservatives can answer that question--how many of you are more sexually attracted to your daughter than your own wives? Is there anything morally wrong in not knowing the answer yourself?


That is what is known as a huge stretch from his statement.
If she wasn't my daughter________.
Nothing about sex or sexually attracted to.

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 05:40:50   #
Big Kahuna
 
PeterS wrote:
Maybe you Christian Conservatives can answer that question--how many of you are more sexually attracted to your daughter than your own wives? Is there anything morally wrong in not knowing the answer yourself?


You may want ask this question to a muslim. It would be more apropos. Just make sure your head is attached to your body afterwards!!

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 05:46:03   #
Big Kahuna
 
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
You need a boyfriend.....bad!!

See what perm has going on. .....a match made in liberal hell, perfect for you.


Perm and Peter. The Perm and Peter Principle is a logical idea for these two regressives. The principle states, "wherever Perm's wind blows, Peter will be there to sniff it".

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 05:50:53   #
Big Kahuna
 
PeterS wrote:
So as long as he wins you don't care who he lusts after? Looks like your moral compass is more befuddled than his. It makes you wonder if he crawled into bed with Ivanka when she was a little girl. Eh, who cares. So long as Donald wins what it matter how immoral a pig he is correct!


Trump has some pretty darn good genes to produce a beautiful woman like Ivanka!! On the other hand your progeny resembles some ugly girl that looks more like the Clinton's inferior genetic makeup----- Chelsea ""Hub" Clinton.

Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2020 05:54:22   #
Big Kahuna
 
PeterS wrote:
It is probably coming from the quote he made on Stern about how he wished Ivanka wasn't his daughter so he could bang her. Trump has made several lude comments about Ivanka in public and privately he was attracted to women who remained him of his daughter. And why would it matter what he said about his daughter? You cons have already shown that you don't care about Trump's moral character. He could rape Ivanka in the Oval Office and you cons wouldn't blink an eye. I just enjoy showing just how far you have fallen all for the sake of political power.

As for being embarrassed for me. You are the ones who have given up all moral bearing for the sake of political power. You can't get more shameful than that. You have 15 qualified men, all with impeccable moral character, and you chose the one who had the morality of a pig. There is nothing I could post that would come close to showing how disgraceful you cons have become all for the sake of achieving political power.
It is probably coming from the quote he made on St... (show quote)


Peter boy, you should be permanently banned from this site. You have become blasphemous and a danger to those around you. You are so mentally sick that I don't even think Freud himself could help you out. TDS has overtaken you.

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 06:23:41   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
drlarrygino wrote:
Peter boy, you should be permanently banned from this site. You have become blasphemous and a danger to those around you. You are so mentally sick that I don't even think Freud himself could help you out. TDS has overtaken you.

In all seriousness, no. Read Romans 1:18-32. God has turned him over to a depraved mind.

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 06:25:17   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
drlarrygino wrote:
Perm and Peter. The Perm and Peter Principle is a logical idea for these two regressives. The principle states, "wherever Perm's wind blows, Peter will be there to sniff it".



Reply
Feb 13, 2020 06:38:51   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
JW wrote:
As far as I can find info on this, it appears to have been something a columnist invented for a piece he was doing but decided to remove from the article before it got published. So, what you have is an unsourced comment by an anti-Trump journalist that didn't even carry enough weight to end up in print.

Pete, you should be ashamed of yourself for even thinking that Meme was legitimate. I am certainly ashamed for you.


A Liberal ashamed? The rest of us have come to expect crap like this. Liberals are good at inventing fabrications. I think they have a factory in San Francisco. Unt***hs Are Us.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.