One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Bloomberg’s supposed gaff is one of the few things I agree with him on.
Page <<first <prev 5 of 12 next> last>>
Feb 13, 2020 15:05:58   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
JediKnight wrote:
Confucius also say, "Man who eats jelly beans fart in techni-color!"


??? I suppose.

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 15:07:57   #
JediKnight
 
dtucker300 wrote:
??? I suppose.


Confucius also say, "man who fall down in snow get all wet."

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 15:17:10   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
JediKnight wrote:
I have no doubt that Mayor Pete is openly gay - I believe he has admitted that in public. I do not support him either. Sanders is a socialist. But I don't necessarily agree that "all things socialist" are bad things either. I am a firm believer in Christs' Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Having been an orphan, ward of the court, and a foster child passed around through the system for years I guess helped to mold in me the concept that "we may be born alone and we may die alone, but we do not live alone" -so, when I consider that fact I am compelled to bind it with the Golden Rule.

I personally don't see what's so "wrong" with helping others, and I do not see that desire as a 'greater evil.' On the contrary, I believe it is those who would defy God and the good sense of the teachings of Christ who are committing the greater evil. dtucker: when I stand before God on judgment day, I am confident that my belief in helping others (found in the 2nd chapter of Acts) will be rewarded. I don't think those who consider "self above all else" will get the prize.

Christ often said, "He who would be greatest among you must first be as a s***e (<least of all) or servant to all." For those who believe that only the strong should survive, I would hasten to remind them that as strong as they may be -they cannot control the very air necessary to breathe, nor do they know where the wind comes from or where its going. So then; none of us, no not one, is able to add a day to their lives through the doing of evil -and it is pleasing to God when we "think more highly of others than we do of ourselves."
I have no doubt that Mayor Pete is openly gay - I ... (show quote)


You are correct insofar as the golden rule is supposed to govern our personal conduct with others and not how the government is organized. Socialism is a system of government that controls the means of production and infringes on our individual God-given rights. That's not to say that there are things that don't need to be regulated. Indeed, some regulation is needed to prevent abuses and to ensure free entry and fair play in all aspects of our dealings with others. Courts are necessary to ensure fairness and protect the property rights of the individual.

Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2020 16:20:55   #
JediKnight
 
dtucker300 wrote:
You are correct insofar as the golden rule is supposed to govern our personal conduct with others and not how the government is organized. Socialism is a system of government that controls the means of production and infringes on our individual God-given rights. That's not to say that there are things that don't need to be regulated. Indeed, some regulation is needed to prevent abuses and to ensure free entry and fair play in all aspects of our dealings with others. Courts are necessary to ensure fairness and protect the property rights of the individual.
You are correct insofar as the golden rule is supp... (show quote)


I can agree with that with zero rebuttal. Good day to you!

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 16:59:26   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
JediKnight wrote:
Confucius also say, "man who fall down in snow get all wet."


Confucius say " don't be man with hand in pocket and feel cocky"

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 17:03:12   #
JediKnight
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Confucius say " don't be man with hand in pocket and feel cocky"


Another good one! The bible also teaches: "in order to know the word (of God) they must hear the word...to hear the word they need a preacher...."

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 17:07:14   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
JediKnight wrote:
Another good one! The bible also teaches: "in order to know the word (of God) they must hear the word...to hear the word they need a preacher...."



Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2020 17:37:02   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
JediKnight wrote:
It appears that like most republicans, when you don't have an intelligent response -you deflect. sad.


Not programming time to address stupidity and ignorance is a highly disciplined and intelligent response. It is not a deflection.

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 17:45:08   #
JediKnight
 
padremike wrote:
Not programming time to address stupidity and ignorance is a highly disciplined and intelligent response. It is not a deflection.


If that were true, then how can you listen to, support, and defend Trump -a man who seems filled to the brim with ignorance?

Before you go ballistic, know that one definition of "ignorance" is simply: unaware, or not knowing.

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 17:58:12   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
JediKnight wrote:
If that were true, then how can you listen to, support, and defend Trump -a man who seems filled to the brim with ignorance?

Before you go ballistic, know that one definition of "ignorance" is simply: unaware, or not knowing.


We don't take what Trump says seriously enough to actually believe all that he says and that he actually believes it himself. He is a performer. He knows it causes the proggies heads to explode. It is all part of the show and the Art of War. Judge by what he accomplishes, not what he says. We've been over this before. You don't have to agree with nor accept it. But you seem to keep misunderstanding this point. You might ask yourself if you are taking it all too seriously? Tomorrow will still come, and the sun will still come up. Come November we have a chance to make our choice. Until then, the world will still continue, with all its imperfections.

Reply
Feb 13, 2020 19:15:08   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
JediKnight wrote:
If that were true, then how can you listen to, support, and defend Trump -a man who seems filled to the brim with ignorance?

Before you go ballistic, know that one definition of "ignorance" is simply: unaware, or not knowing.


You present the simplest questions that even a two year old can answer while you cannot. We support the President because, in spite of the constant bombardments from s*******s L*****ts, he's still very successful. We understand you can't recognize his success because you're told not to and being good little Marxist (if there exist such a creature) you hear and obey. One major difference between your mob and our Patriots is that if the President was not producing we'd be be all over him. You prigs, hooked on personality cults, care little for success emphasizing a need for increased social engineering. Can you even begin to imagine the Joy that would have exoded in the DNC if an articulate, Black, female, lesbian preacher had thrown her hat into the p**********l ring? Hallelujah!

Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2020 11:20:57   #
JediKnight
 
dtucker300 wrote:
We don't take what Trump says seriously enough to actually believe all that he says and that he actually believes it himself. He is a performer. He knows it causes the proggies heads to explode. It is all part of the show and the Art of War. Judge by what he accomplishes, not what he says. We've been over this before. You don't have to agree with nor accept it. But you seem to keep misunderstanding this point. You might ask yourself if you are taking it all too seriously? Tomorrow will still come, and the sun will still come up. Come November we have a chance to make our choice. Until then, the world will still continue, with all its imperfections.
We don't take what Trump says seriously enough to ... (show quote)


Question: why would you support (and defend) someone you don't take seriously? Does this mean that all those who support Trump are largely doing so because they are reaping some benefit that the rest of us just don't see or understand? And if that be the case, is that benefit worth the scourge of the h**eful discrimination, the division, and the chaos that Trump promotes so cravenly and freely?

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 12:13:33   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
JediKnight wrote:
Question: why would you support (and defend) someone you don't take seriously? Does this mean that all those who support Trump are largely doing so because they are reaping some benefit that the rest of us just don't see or understand? And if that be the case, is that benefit worth the scourge of the h**eful discrimination, the division, and the chaos that Trump promotes so cravenly and freely?


What you don't seem to understand is that there are those of us who do not agree with you and believe our opinion is just as important to us as you think your's is to you. I think President Obama was the worst and most damaging President to the U.S. in my lifetime. He promoted race hatred more than Trump ever has. He disliked the U.S. as Founded. I'm sure you disagree and I could care less. I don't like Trump. Never have, but I agree with his policies (most). I see what your side is openly promoting and I consider much of it not only damaging to the U.S. but to the Individual. In other words, a polite, PC Bernie Sanders would cause much more damage to the U.S. than a crass, bloviating, ass, Trump.

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 13:19:06   #
JediKnight
 
JFlorio wrote:
What you don't seem to understand is that there are those of us who do not agree with you and believe our opinion is just as important to us as you think your's is to you. I think President Obama was the worst and most damaging President to the U.S. in my lifetime. He promoted race hatred more than Trump ever has. He disliked the U.S. as Founded. I'm sure you disagree and I could care less. I don't like Trump. Never have, but I agree with his policies (most). I see what your side is openly promoting and I consider much of it not only damaging to the U.S. but to the Individual. In other words, a polite, PC Bernie Sanders would cause much more damage to the U.S. than a crass, bloviating, ass, Trump.
What you don't seem to understand is that there ar... (show quote)


Finally, we're getting somewhere! Okay, I understand your h**e for Obama -and that is your right if you choose to do so. You said "I don't like Trump -never have." Can you tell me "which" of Trump's policies you agree with? Are you saying that you can overlook the h**e, discrimination, lying, division and chaos that Trump promotes because he did.....what exactly?

You keep making the mistake of thinking that "I have a side" = you refer to it as "my side." J - I don't have any particular 'side.' I have said on here many times before that I consider the candidate, their platform and their party -then I decide my v**e based on who I think has the better vision, how they plan to implement that vision, etc.

I have v**ed for republicans and democrats alike. I would never base my v**e on "who the last president was or what they did just to spite their party" because ANY politician is capable of doing great things, just as any politician is capable of being totally destructive. I believe my "v**e" is more valuable than that.

What do you see the other side "promoting" that you find damaging both to the country and the individual? And if you can, please tell me how that is any worse than what Trump is doing pushing h**e, division, separation, and discrimination.

Reply
Feb 14, 2020 13:43:27   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
JediKnight wrote:
Question: why would you support (and defend) someone you don't take seriously? Does this mean that all those who support Trump are largely doing so because they are reaping some benefit that the rest of us just don't see or understand? And if that be the case, is that benefit worth the scourge of the h**eful discrimination, the division, and the chaos that Trump promotes so cravenly and freely?


I didn't say I don't take him seriously. Everything is all or none with you. I said I don't take seriously much of what he says, specifically tweets. I don't use twitter and so I don't listen to what he tweets. A lot depends on the context in which he says things. The benefit is that he is turning the status quo in its head. He too is fundamentally changing America in the opposite direction of what Obama did; to value the founders' vision in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Actions speak louder than words.

As with beauty, h**e, discrimination, division, chaos are in the eye of the beholder. I didn't v**e for Trump because I h**ed Obama; I didn't h**e Obama. I didn't agree with his l*****t vision for fundamentally t***sforming America. I can't speak for others and I can only generalize about what I think and others have told. There are always exceptions to any generalization but that doesn't invalidate the perspective I am presenting which is based on listening and being aware of what other people have to say. I v**ed for Trump because Hillary was his opponent. She was the worst candidate we have had run for President in my lifetime. After all was said and done, I did not favor Trump but he emerged from the Republican Convention to Challenge Hillary. As a matter of fact, I actually v**ed for Gary Johnson. Three years later, and I am glad Trump defeated Hillary. I can't argue with much of what he has done and achieved for Americans. Considering the current bunch of democrats running for President, I will most likely v**e for Trump in 2020.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.