One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
About Time - Moving Against Santuary Cities
Page 1 of 8 next> last>>
Feb 11, 2020 08:19:13   #
American Vet
 
The Trump administration is moving aggressively against the sanctuary city/state problem. It began last week when the administration announced that it was prohibiting New York state residents from participating in programs such as Global Entry and NEXUS which allow low-risk travelers to enter the U.S. more easily.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/02/the_trump_administration_is_finally_going_after_sanctuary_cities.html

Reply
Feb 11, 2020 08:24:02   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
American Vet wrote:
The Trump administration is moving aggressively against the sanctuary city/state problem. It began last week when the administration announced that it was prohibiting New York state residents from participating in programs such as Global Entry and NEXUS which allow low-risk travelers to enter the U.S. more easily.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/02/the_trump_administration_is_finally_going_after_sanctuary_cities.html


Yep, must reinforce the power of the Federal Government.

Reply
Feb 11, 2020 08:29:22   #
Liberty Tree
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Yep, must reinforce the power of the Federal Government.


"No one is above the Law." Is not that what liberals scream, except when it applies to them.

Reply
 
 
Feb 11, 2020 08:32:45   #
American Vet
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Yep, must reinforce the power of the Federal Government.


I am not sure if you mean that in a good wy or a bad way.

However, protecting i*****l a***ns harms all Americans.

Reply
Feb 11, 2020 08:40:07   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
American Vet wrote:
The Trump administration is moving aggressively against the sanctuary city/state problem. It began last week when the administration announced that it was prohibiting New York state residents from participating in programs such as Global Entry and NEXUS which allow low-risk travelers to enter the U.S. more easily.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/02/the_trump_administration_is_finally_going_after_sanctuary_cities.html


Coumo grandstanding again ??? Geez what a pain in the butt.. Suing over a decision?? Lololl have these i***ts learned nothing???

Sanctuary status cities have no legal standing to begin with and federally can find themselves excluded from funding etc.. Just ask Cali~~ or better yet, The SCOTUS...

Reply
Feb 11, 2020 09:13:42   #
Big dog
 
lindajoy wrote:
Coumo grandstanding again ??? Geez what a pain in the butt.. Suing over a decision?? Lololl have these i***ts learned nothing???

Sanctuary status cities have no legal standing to begin with and federally can find themselves excluded from funding etc.. Just ask Cali~~ or better yet, The SCOTUS...


👍👍👍👍👍👍

Reply
Feb 11, 2020 09:25:11   #
RRRoger
 
Why aren't those who "Aid & Abet" known criminals being put in jail?

Reply
 
 
Feb 11, 2020 09:32:39   #
hdjimv Loc: South Dakota
 
RRRoger wrote:
Why aren't those who "Aid & Abet" known criminals being put in jail?


That would be just about the whole Democratic party!

Reply
Feb 11, 2020 10:21:30   #
Pariahjf
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
"No one is above the Law." Is not that what liberals scream, except when it applies to them.


I thought we were supposed to be for LESS governmental control???

Reply
Feb 11, 2020 10:22:44   #
bahmer
 
American Vet wrote:
The Trump administration is moving aggressively against the sanctuary city/state problem. It began last week when the administration announced that it was prohibiting New York state residents from participating in programs such as Global Entry and NEXUS which allow low-risk travelers to enter the U.S. more easily.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/02/the_trump_administration_is_finally_going_after_sanctuary_cities.html


Amen and Amen they should do that to more states and I live in Illinois which could be one of those states.

Reply
Feb 11, 2020 10:41:20   #
Liberty Tree
 
Pariahjf wrote:
I thought we were supposed to be for LESS governmental control???


Less government control over those who obey laws, but not for those who break them.

Reply
 
 
Feb 11, 2020 10:53:25   #
Pariahjf
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Less government control over those who obey laws, but not for those who break them.


And who determines what breaks the law? And to what degree? What's a misdemeanor in one state is a felony in another place. That's the issue.

Reply
Feb 11, 2020 10:57:16   #
Kevyn
 
American Vet wrote:
The Trump administration is moving aggressively against the sanctuary city/state problem. It began last week when the administration announced that it was prohibiting New York state residents from participating in programs such as Global Entry and NEXUS which allow low-risk travelers to enter the U.S. more easily.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/02/the_trump_administration_is_finally_going_after_sanctuary_cities.html


That should endear him to the hedge fund republicans who use the trusted traveler program.

Reply
Feb 11, 2020 11:09:44   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Yep, must reinforce the power of the Federal Government.


C****a v***s anyone? Think before u speak! We are pretty full, need to care for our own first!

Reply
Feb 11, 2020 11:11:04   #
American Vet
 
Pariahjf wrote:
And who determines what breaks the law? And to what degree? What's a misdemeanor in one state is a felony in another place. That's the issue.


Breaking the law is breaking the law.

They are here illegally....

Reply
Page 1 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.