One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
democrats Only Want Their Witnesses
Jan 28, 2020 07:44:31   #
American Vet
 
According to President Donald Trump’s legal team, Democrats are concealing the testimony of a major witness the House questioned during its investigation into the Ukraine matter.

Alex Swoyer and S.A. Miller at the Washington Times reported that House Democrats are refusing to disclose the testimony of Michael Atkinson, the intelligence agency inspector general with firsthand knowledge of the origins of the whistleblower complaint that resulted in Trump’s impeachment.

https://conservativefighters.org/news/report-schiff-may-have-hidden-potentially-exculpatory-evidence-from-trumps-lawyers/

Reply
Jan 28, 2020 07:47:04   #
tbutkovich
 
The Senate needs to call Michael Atkinson as a witness!

Reply
Jan 28, 2020 07:51:04   #
Liberty Tree
 
tbutkovich wrote:
The Senate needs to call Michael Atkinson as a witness!


Democrats will oppose any witness they do not choose.

Reply
 
 
Jan 28, 2020 07:57:19   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
American Vet wrote:
According to President Donald Trump’s legal team, Democrats are concealing the testimony of a major witness the House questioned during its investigation into the Ukraine matter.

Alex Swoyer and S.A. Miller at the Washington Times reported that House Democrats are refusing to disclose the testimony of Michael Atkinson, the intelligence agency inspector general with firsthand knowledge of the origins of the whistleblower complaint that resulted in Trump’s impeachment.

https://conservativefighters.org/news/report-schiff-may-have-hidden-potentially-exculpatory-evidence-from-trumps-lawyers/
According to President Donald Trump’s legal team, ... (show quote)



Yes, well then let everyone file their Subpoenas to appear and see who let whom show up! Stalemate!!

Reply
Jan 28, 2020 08:01:16   #
tbutkovich
 
Actually no witnesses should be called. Why should the Senators give any more credibility to this “Sham Impeachment Process.”

Reply
Jan 28, 2020 08:20:00   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
tbutkovich wrote:
Actually no witnesses should be called. Why should the Senators give any more credibility to this “Sham Impeachment Process.”


I dont disagree with you Im just saying they have a lot more to be concerned with Biden. Biden and Ukraine as well as the people trail to the supposed whistleblowers etc They wont risk it.. like backing off their Subpoena for Bolton...

Reply
Jan 28, 2020 08:32:51   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
lindajoy wrote:
I dont disagree with you Im just saying they have a lot more to be concerned with Biden. Biden and Ukraine as well as the people trail to the supposed whistleblowers etc They wont risk it.. like backing off their Subpoena for Bolton...


Hey lindajoy, I think you’ve nailed it. They (Democrats) have stuck there foot in it again. They want to cry we need witnesses but behind the scenes they hope the Senate v**es no.

Reply
 
 
Jan 28, 2020 08:49:09   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
JFlorio wrote:
Hey lindajoy, I think you’ve nailed it. They (Democrats) have stuck there foot in it again. They want to cry we need witnesses but behind the scenes they hope the Senate v**es no.


It is what I believe.So lets call it for stalemate~~~and of course letting the people see it in motion~~❤️

Reply
Jan 29, 2020 18:50:53   #
roy
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Democrats will oppose any witness they do not choose.


I think they should bring in Rick perry who was in Ukraine at the time trump and his minnows were pressuring the Ukraine to investigate biden. AND at the same time perry got the people that helped fund his campaigns and the use of their privates planes a 50 year deal for for drilling for oil and gas at multi million dollars below highest bids. Trump new about this to but that was OK . Perry also knows about trump pressuring Ukraine to investigate biden. You people call biden a crook let's bring in perry let him testify,by the way where is perry,why have we not heard from lately,why would trump want him quite,seems some republicans have more to hide than democrates. But according to people on opp democrates are the only ones that are crooked.By the way the people that helped fund perry's campaigns names are bleyzer,and cranberg.

Reply
Jan 29, 2020 19:04:04   #
roy
 
lindajoy wrote:
I dont disagree with you Im just saying they have a lot more to be concerned with Biden. Biden and Ukraine as well as the people trail to the supposed whistleblowers etc They wont risk it.. like backing off their Subpoena for Bolton...


Maybe they should bring in Rick perry he knows the t***h about the whole thing.He was there in Ukraine when this whole think about investigating biden was going on.He was there working out a deal for the people that helped finance his campaigns,and the use of their private jets,and guess what he did,with a gas and oil drilling contact for 50 years for multi million dollars under the highest bids.So where is Rick perry why is he so quiet.You people keep talking about biden and his son being crooked. TRUMP knows about this deal perry pulled off why is he not investigating perry? Could it be perry is not running against him,what could it be?

Reply
Jan 29, 2020 21:20:02   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
roy wrote:
Maybe they should bring in Rick perry he knows the t***h about the whole thing.He was there in Ukraine when this whole think about investigating biden was going on.He was there working out a deal for the people that helped finance his campaigns,and the use of their private jets,and guess what he did,with a gas and oil drilling contact for 50 years for multi million dollars under the highest bids.So where is Rick perry why is he so quiet.You people keep talking about biden and his son being crooked. TRUMP knows about this deal perry pulled off why is he not investigating perry? Could it be perry is not running against him,what could it be?
Maybe they should bring in Rick perry he knows the... (show quote)


That’s good question.. You should probably ask Pels or Nadler or Schifty why they didn’t pursue it unless of course they determined it was not worth having to get caught up in Bidens visit or even perhaps because that trip with Perry was done within protocol???

If you get an answer please let me know what they said, ok???

Reply
 
 
Jan 30, 2020 03:39:56   #
roy
 
lindajoy wrote:
That’s good question.. You should probably ask Pels or Nadler or Schifty why they didn’t pursue it unless of course they determined it was not worth having to get caught up in Bidens visit or even perhaps because that trip with Perry was done within protocol???

If you get an answer please let me know what they said, ok???


Yeah within protocol,when a republican does it ,but underhanded and crooked if a liberal does it.

Reply
Jan 30, 2020 06:38:01   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
roy wrote:
Yeah within protocol,when a republican does it ,but underhanded and crooked if a liberal does it.


You assume too much~~I did not say it was within protocol, I said perhaps it was and the right people to ask why Kerry was not targeted is Pels and family~~I said nothing of underhandedness and crooks~~ You did...

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.