One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Having Witnesses Isn't A T***sactional Deal Thing, Republicans Have Whoever They Want
Jan 27, 2020 19:22:53   #
woodguru
 
This is a truly ridiculous and rhetorical argument, dems having Bolton, Mulvaney, or anyone else isn't about whether they "let" republicans have H****r B***n or the whistleblower, these are separate arguments, but most important if republicans want either of the irrelevant witnesses they think dems will oppose, these are separate arguments, make the case for them and tale a v**e, they can get them if they want them because they have enough v**es to do it. This is not a t***sactional deal that dems getting who they want has anything to do with who they want.

Reply
Jan 27, 2020 19:28:32   #
Liberty Tree
 
woodguru wrote:
This is a truly ridiculous and rhetorical argument, dems having Bolton, Mulvaney, or anyone else isn't about whether they "let" republicans have H****r B***n or the whistleblower, these are separate arguments, but most important if republicans want either of the irrelevant witnesses they think dems will oppose, these are separate arguments, make the case for them and tale a v**e, they can get them if they want them because they have enough v**es to do it. This is not a t***sactional deal that dems getting who they want has anything to do with who they want.
This is a truly ridiculous and rhetorical argument... (show quote)

Except Democrats only want the witnesses they choose and will pitch a fit over any others. Republicans need to wind this up as Democrats just want to d**g it out as long as possible.

Reply
Jan 27, 2020 19:51:18   #
TrueAmerican
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Except Democrats only want the witnesses they choose and will pitch a fit over any others. Republicans need to wind this up as Democrats just want to d**g it out as long as possible.



Reply
 
 
Jan 27, 2020 19:58:15   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
woodguru wrote:
This is a truly ridiculous and rhetorical argument, dems having Bolton, Mulvaney, or anyone else isn't about whether they "let" republicans have H****r B***n or the whistleblower, these are separate arguments, but most important if republicans want either of the irrelevant witnesses they think dems will oppose, these are separate arguments, make the case for them and tale a v**e, they can get them if they want them because they have enough v**es to do it. This is not a t***sactional deal that dems getting who they want has anything to do with who they want.
This is a truly ridiculous and rhetorical argument... (show quote)


You Goobers are runnin' skeered.

Trump's lawyers are blowin' holes in your h**xes and outright lies.





Reply
Jan 27, 2020 20:13:21   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
woodguru wrote:
This is a truly ridiculous and rhetorical argument, dems having Bolton, Mulvaney, or anyone else isn't about whether they "let" republicans have H****r B***n or the whistleblower, these are separate arguments, but most important if republicans want either of the irrelevant witnesses they think dems will oppose, these are separate arguments, make the case for them and tale a v**e, they can get them if they want them because they have enough v**es to do it. This is not a t***sactional deal that dems getting who they want has anything to do with who they want.
This is a truly ridiculous and rhetorical argument... (show quote)


And your understanding /definition of t***sactional is....?

Reply
Jan 27, 2020 20:32:32   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
woodguru wrote:
This is a truly ridiculous and rhetorical argument, dems having Bolton, Mulvaney, or anyone else isn't about whether they "let" republicans have H****r B***n or the whistleblower, these are separate arguments, but most important if republicans want either of the irrelevant witnesses they think dems will oppose, these are separate arguments, make the case for them and tale a v**e, they can get them if they want them because they have enough v**es to do it. This is not a t***sactional deal that dems getting who they want has anything to do with who they want.
This is a truly ridiculous and rhetorical argument... (show quote)


Uh oh! Right now, Alan Dershowitz is laying the third degree on the House dems in this "impeachment" trial. Man, is he telling them how the cow ate the cabbage. Essentially he is giving those fools an eye-opening education on our Constitution, specifically on how the founders arrived at their conclusions on what constitutes grounds for impeachment and why they set the bar so high.



Reply
Jan 27, 2020 20:36:06   #
roy
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Except Democrats only want the witnesses they choose and will pitch a fit over any others. Republicans need to wind this up as Democrats just want to d**g it out as long as possible.


I say let everybody testify that needs to if it's Biden so be it,seems like this is the whole thing we are in this whole crap in the first place.Trump in his way was scared of his political opponent that had a change to beat him in 2020,that's why we are in the shape we are in now.

Reply
 
 
Jan 27, 2020 20:59:45   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
roy wrote:
I say let everybody testify that needs to if it's Biden so be it,seems like this is the whole thing we are in this whole crap in the first place.Trump in his way was scared of his political opponent that had a change to beat him in 2020,that's why we are in the shape we are in now.


Oh, so Biden is the DNC nominee, and running against Trump this year?
Have Bernie, E. Warren, and Pete Buttplug been informed of this?

Reply
Jan 28, 2020 03:24:50   #
eden
 
The Republicans can save some face by not opposing Bolton's testimony. They will shred his credibility anyway (already started). Then they can acquit Trump of the two Impeachment Articles but issue a rebuke for his intemperance. Dems will pretend outrage (they know he will not be removed by his frightened GOP anyway) but will feel that in impeaching Trump in the house they did what they could. In November the people will decide....

Reply
Jan 28, 2020 10:09:57   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
eden wrote:
The Republicans can save some face by not opposing Bolton's testimony. They will shred his credibility anyway (already started). Then they can acquit Trump of the two Impeachment Articles but issue a rebuke for his intemperance. Dems will pretend outrage (they know he will not be removed by his frightened GOP anyway) but will feel that in impeaching Trump in the house they did what they could. In November the people will decide....


It is, unquestionably, not the Republicans that need to save face.

Reply
Jan 29, 2020 00:17:32   #
eden
 
padremike wrote:
It is, unquestionably, not the Republicans that need to save face.


Unquestionably we will find out in November.

Reply
 
 
Jan 29, 2020 10:08:45   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
eden wrote:
Unquestionably we will find out in November.


If you, as an American, find nothing patently Anti-American in the impeachment tactics used by the Marxis Progressive in the House, then the 2020 e******n can mean nothing.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.