Trump want's the articles of impeachment dismissed (Page 2): Actually I did. It was a different time and a different enemy. Not sure we knew back then who actually was responsible but...

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Lonewolf wrote:

All the investigations nothing! Did you b***h when the Marine Barracks were hit and something like 240 Marines. Died! No because that was Regan's watch
the real culprit in B******i was the i***t they had for an ambassador!

Actually I did. It was a different time and a different enemy. Not sure we knew back then who actually was responsible but Reagans response was weak. It was actually devastating for France also. I believe the groups targetd were a multi national force.
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/beirut-barracks-blown-up

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Kevyn wrote:

Obstruction of justice is not an executive privilege. Remember the courts forced Nixon to hand over the tapes when he tried to pull his dictator BS the same would happen here.

Then let them rule on this also. We all know this should have been settled in the House. That is where evidence is gathered and presented but the House was in such a hurry, or not. the tapes had nothing to do with National Security. John Bolton and others in the Executive Branch do. I wish just once you lefty trolls would do enough research or take a civics class or something to actually have a clue.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Lonewolf wrote:

Withholding evidence from Congress is an rmpeachabul offence!
Executive privilege can't be used to hide a criminal act

Hint; dumbest on OPP. there has been no criminal act. Now if ignorance was a crime you'd get life.

Lonewolf

JFlorio wrote:

Actually I did. It was a different time and a different enemy. Not sure we knew back then who actually was responsible but Reagans response was weak. It was actually devastating for France also. I believe the groups targetd were a multi national force.
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/beirut-barracks-blown-up

Thanks for the link I forgot a lot about the particulars of the attack

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Lonewolf wrote:

Thanks for the link I forgot a lot about the particulars of the attack

You seem to make a habit of that. Very emotional. It's like you're on your period every day.

Lonewolf

JFlorio wrote:

You seem to make a habit of that. Very emotional. It's like you're on your period every day.

Lol

Radiance3

PeterS wrote:

At least 4 Republicans to side with Democrats to f... (show quote)

===============
This trial is non-sense if it goes forward. Validating wrongs to make it right, that t***sgress the constitution. If that happens it will leave a legacy of constitutional abuse of impeachment at the Senate Office.

If trial resumes, witnesses I would require are:
1. The whistle blowers must appear in person and testify under oath.
2. Adam Schitt must testify under oath.
3. Nancy Pelosi must testify under oath.
4. H****r B***n, of Burizma Holdings, Joe Biden demand to fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin within 6 hrs. to get $1 billion. This is an evidence Joe Biden committed "corruption" of any sort in Ukraine.

Jlw Loc: Wisconsin

The Dems now say that they have explosive new evidence, hand written notes and emails. It sounds like schitt is buying another whistle blower

Lonewolf

Radiance3 wrote:

=============== br This trial is non-sense if it g... (show quote)

None of them have anything to do with trump! How about king trump testify. Under oath!!

Lonewolf

If you wasn't to investigate the bidens do it but has nothing to do with trumps impeachment!

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Lonewolf wrote:

If you wasn't to investigate the bidens do it but has nothing to do with trumps impeachment!

Wrong again grasshopper. If corruption involving the Biden’s and Burisma in the Ukraine is proven then Trump had a duty per our treaty with the Ukraine to look into it. Biden is not immune from criminal acts because he is a candidate. Hell he’s been a corrupt shill for the credit card companies for decades.

Lonewolf

JFlorio wrote:

Wrong again grasshopper. If corruption involving the Biden’s and Burisma in the Ukraine is proven then Trump had a duty per our treaty with the Ukraine to look into it. Biden is not immune from criminal acts because he is a candidate. Hell he’s been a corrupt shill for the credit card companies for decades.

Why did he ignore this for over 2 years and only when biden decide to run was it important?
Trump wanted them to say they started a investigation so he could use it in the e******n.
Far as corrupt Trump's been a white collar criminal his entire life he treated his workers up a tried to steal 2 million dollars from a children's cancer hospital.
He was forced to close his school an had to reimburse his students 25 million dollars.
his foundation was closed because of improprieties. .

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Probably because there was much more going on and didn’t seem important. The rest of your drivel is your typical lies or just repeating talking points. Sorry you are so dumb.

Lonewolf wrote:

Why did he ignore this for over 2 years and only w... (show quote)

Lonewolf

JFlorio wrote:

Probably because there was much more going on and didn’t seem important. The rest of your drivel is your typical lies or just repeating talking points. Sorry you are so dumb.

And you blindly follow the t*****r!
Do some research every thing I posted is true , but I'll bet your to lazy !

Radiance3

Lonewolf wrote:

None of them have anything to do with trump! How about king trump testify. Under oath!!

===============
The people I called to testify were the ones who fabricated f**e stories about the president. Every issue presented were made up by Adam Schitt. The Whistle blower does not exist. That was Adam Schitt.

The president has nothing to testify because he is innocent, loneytune.