One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Self Defense Against an I***t
Page <<first <prev 5 of 8 next> last>>
Jan 13, 2020 14:03:26   #
Hug
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Are you in Ohio too?


No, I am a Missouri, hillbilly, red neck and proud of it.

Reply
Jan 13, 2020 14:04:49   #
American Vet
 
Perhaps you meant "Wild" Bill Hickok.

On August 1, 1876, Hickok was playing poker at Nuttal & Mann's Saloon No. 10 in Deadwood, Dakota Territory. When a seat opened up at the table, a drunk man named Jack McCall sat down to play. McCall lost heavily. Hickok encouraged McCall to quit the game until he could cover his losses and offered to give him money for breakfast. Although McCall accepted the money, he was apparently insulted.[64]

The next day, Hickok was playing poker again. He usually sat with his back to a wall so he could see the entrance, but the only seat available when he joined the game was a chair facing away from the door. He twice asked another man at the table, Charles Rich, to change seats with him, but Rich refused.[65]

McCall entered the saloon, walked up behind Hickok, drew his Colt Model 1873 Single Action Army .45-caliber revolver, and shouted, "Damn you! Take that!" before shooting Hickok in the back of the head at point-blank range

Reply
Jan 13, 2020 15:06:23   #
Carol Kelly
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Should have shot him...

That sort of bigotry shouldn't be tolerated...


I agree!

Reply
 
 
Jan 13, 2020 15:07:43   #
Carol Kelly
 
Hug wrote:
No, I am a Missouri, hillbilly, red neck and proud of it.


As you should be!

Reply
Jan 13, 2020 16:52:49   #
American Vet
 
Hug wrote:
No, I am a Missouri, hillbilly, red neck and proud of it.


Me too!!

Reply
Jan 13, 2020 18:14:08   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Should have shot him...

That sort of bigotry shouldn't be tolerated...


Read an article where a 43-year-old man knocked a trump hat off a 70-year-old man and spit on him. He told police he wasn't sorry because the man was a c*******t and he would go to jail happy. This needs to stop

Reply
Jan 13, 2020 18:53:09   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
American Vet wrote:
Police say a Trump supporter wearing a red “Make America Great Again” hat pulled a gun on a man who threatened to assault him and then swatted at him to knock the hat off his head.

After the Trump supporter pulled the gun, the suspect fled, police said.

https://www.citizensvoice.com/news/police-attack-on-trump-supporter-sparked-active-shooter-scare-at-mall-1.2580489


Thok that's it, walk away. By standing there you attract attention, move on.

Reply
 
 
Jan 13, 2020 20:42:58   #
jeff smith
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Shooting someone to keep you from getting your ass kicked should be a felony!


it is . unless your the Hispanic guy in Florida who shot the young black kid . said he was fearful of loosing his life . this I still think is and was a crock of dung !

Reply
Jan 13, 2020 21:53:17   #
dongreen76
 
jeff smith wrote:
it is . unless your the Hispanic guy in Florida who shot the young black kid . said he was fearful of loosing his life . this I still think is and was a crock of dung !


Zimmerman was more or less hispanic,and I think a little bit Jewish.In any event he was acting in a neighbor Hood watch capacity.He legally had no justification for accosting (Trevan) the youth whom was murdered.I , having acted in a similar law enforcement capacity know the rules of engagement regarding such incidents.Had not Zimmerman had the type of personality flaw I alluded about in an earlier post(one of those right wing lunatics) he well may not have confronted Trevan ; had not he had a weapon.To substantiate my theory about his right wing cowardness,he was the bigger man,he was the stronger more maturer man,and still knowing he had a gun ,he elected to use it- after the police told him to abort-also ,were he not psychologically flawed , and carrying a weapon he wouldn't have acted on a compulsion to prove his man hood after being humiliated by a young boy.He probably would have followed police orders and aborted.This is why most police departments do not agree with the current conceal and carry law.His life wouldn't have been in Jeopardy were he not a personality flawed,overzealous, right wing, feelings of great inadequatcy loony.

Reply
Jan 13, 2020 22:21:08   #
dongreen76
 
Pat R**t wrote:
Are you joking? If there was a stat to be had in that category, the libtard media would have broadcasted it 24/7! Fact is, there are no stats because the occurrence is rare, if ever.
And parsing words about the great equalizer is pathetic. If you noticed, genius, "great equalizer" in my post is in all lower case letters - denoting that the phrase is NOT in reference to the Colt or ANY proper name. You're obviously not observant or adept in the English. Kindly educate yourself before exposing your tardship further...
Are you joking? If there was a stat to be had in t... (show quote)


If you had an understanding of the second Amendment you would know that it was not talking exclusively about individual rights to carry guns,It was referring to the country (We the People)as a whole.If you had been properly educated you would know the proper way to read,and that is to decern what the writer means (when in doubt about a word,or what he is trying to pervay)you are supposed to consider the surrounding words and the context of the conversational/dialogue in which they speak of-and what were the founders doing and discussing ? that's right,the forming of the laws and rules in which we would be governed. "We",meaning the country,not individuals.So - when discussing the right to bear(wrong word,it should have been BARE) they were discussing the collective armament of the country,the right to bare a m*****a,from the word military,meaning an ARMY.So that WE THE PEOPLE,THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (an entity being born,could defend it self.)
Where you got the word or phrase equalizer, came about when Samuel Colt innovated the Colt forty five,he called it the equalizer ,whether you know it or not.

Reply
Jan 13, 2020 22:36:49   #
Hug
 
dongreen76 wrote:
If you had an understanding of the second Amendment you would know that it was not talking exclusively about individual rights to carry guns,It was referring to the country (We the People)as a whole.If you had been properly educated you would know the proper way to read,and that is to decern what the writer means (when in doubt about a word,or what he is trying to pervay)you are supposed to consider the surrounding words and the context of the conversational/dialogue in which they speak of-and what were the founders doing and discussing ? that's right,the forming of the laws and rules in which we would be governed. "We",meaning the country,not individuals.So - when discussing the right to bear(wrong word,it should have been BARE) they were discussing the collective armament of the country,the right to bare a m*****a,from the word military,meaning an ARMY.So that WE THE PEOPLE,THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (an entity being born,could defend it self.)
Where you got the word or phrase equalizer, came about when Samuel Colt innovated the Colt forty five,he called it the equalizer ,whether you know it or not.
If you had an understanding of the second Amendmen... (show quote)


dongreen76: This issue has been debated for a long time and the Supreme Court has made several rulings. I fall on the side of the 2nd Amendment meaning that an individual can keep and bare arms. I truly believe the 2nd Amendment is more important now than in the days of the Indian Wars. I believe we live in a more dangerous world now than existed in the past.

Reply
 
 
Jan 13, 2020 23:29:13   #
dongreen76
 
Hug wrote:
dongreen76: This issue has been debated for a long time and the Supreme Court has made several rulings. I fall on the side of the 2nd Amendment meaning that an individual can keep and bare arms. I truly believe the 2nd Amendment is more important now than in the days of the Indian Wars. I believe we live in a more dangerous world now than existed in the past.


"YOU PEOPLE" seem to have a problem with interpretation.I believe in the right to self defense also.The chief argument from I and other second amendment opponents is not whether or not you have a right to own a gun,but more or less how many and how big a gun are you allowed to own,a lot of you second amendment enthusiast want a small arsenal,and at least ,at least, a smidgent of nuclear capability

Reply
Jan 13, 2020 23:37:02   #
Hug
 
dongreen76 wrote:
"YOU PEOPLE" seem to have a problem with interpretation.I believe in the right to self defense also.The chief argument from I and other second amendment opponents is not whether or not you have a right to own a gun,but more or less how many and how big a gun are you allowed to own,a lot of you second amendment enthusiast want a small arsenal,and at least ,at least, a smidgent of nuclear capability


dongreen76, I do see your point, although I do not entirely agree. I don't think the number of guns should be limited,but I have mixed emotions about what type. I personally don't have any need for fully automatic weapons. My neighbor has a .50 caliber military rifle he plays with. I guess if it makes him happy, who am I to say he shouldn't have it.

Reply
Jan 13, 2020 23:42:12   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
dongreen76 wrote:
"YOU PEOPLE" seem to have a problem with interpretation.I believe in the right to self defense also.The chief argument from I and other second amendment opponents is not whether or not you have a right to own a gun,but more or less how many and how big a gun are you allowed to own,a lot of you second amendment enthusiast want a small arsenal,and at least ,at least, a smidgent of nuclear capability


I appreciate you breaking in to this argument dongreen

Why have assault rifles in neighborhoods? It's preposterous, yet that's our country

Reply
Jan 13, 2020 23:46:21   #
dongreen76
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Wyatt Earp is dead, died by the gun.


Wyatt Earp died in 1929, practically of old age,at 80,more precisely he died of urinary tract infection at his home in Los Angeles ,in bed.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.