Fox News Guest: Children Don’t Deserve ‘Free Food’ Because ‘That’s C*******m’ (Page 2): I think once they've had two kids on welfare, there should be sterilization .

Tug484

American Vet wrote:

I tend to agree with you. But that is a suggestion. As was someone's suggestion "If you can't feed's, don't breed's." - which I also agree with.

However, the issue remains that there are a LOT of children going to school hungry; mostly because of very bad decisions made by their parent(s).

I think once they've had two kids on welfare, there should be sterilization .

Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas

Singularity wrote:

K**l me, . . .NOW!!!

Sing-y,

How in the world of obscurity have you been ?

Shine on you crazy diamond.

Singularity

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

I also agree with her...

People should provide their own children with food... These programs not only take the responsibility away from the pardnts, but they help to increase people's dependency on the state....

I believe strongly in "If you can't feed them, don't breed them"...

The funny thing is that I don't think there are any c*******t nations that provide free lunch for kids....

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2011-11/08/content_14053445.htm

Amazing! Dated TODAY!

"BEIJING - A recent government initiative to prevent rural children from starving has raised the hopes of grassroots philanthropists. This came after the State Council, China's Cabinet, announced that the central government will offer nutrition subsidies to 26 million poor students in rural areas."

Synecdoche or Communal Effort
Synecdoche or Communal Effort...

Singularity

Wolf counselor wrote:

Sing-y,

How in the world of obscurity have you been ?

Shine on you crazy diamond.

I'm fine. Why do you ask? Did someone say something!?

Fine, I tell you.

My, what big teeth you have, Gran. . . .

Singularity

Radiance3 wrote:

================ br i No one teach them to fish. ... (show quote)

Perhaps the children are natural born Americans. Like you.

American Vet

Tug484 wrote:

I think once they've had two kids on welfare, there should be sterilization .

Way back when (in the 70's? maybe) someone suggested that an unwed mother get X amount of dollars for child support (from the government).

And that was it. If she had more children, the X stayed the same.

If she late got a job, the amount she received plus her salary would be X. And, of course, when her salary surpassed X, the government amount would stop. The idea would be to provide a basic level of support, but at least some encouragement to do better.

Singularity

American Vet wrote:

Way back when (in the 70's? maybe) someone suggested that an unwed mother get X amount of dollars for child support (from the government).

And that was it. If she had more children, the X stayed the same.

If she late got a job, the amount she received plus her salary would be X. And, of course, when her salary surpassed X, the government amount would stop. The idea would be to provide a basic level of support, but at least some encouragement to do better.

I think they punted and romanticized the notion of going after "Deadbeat Dad's" instead.

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

American Vet wrote:

Way back when (in the 70's? maybe) someone suggested that an unwed mother get X amount of dollars for child support (from the government).

And that was it. If she had more children, the X stayed the same.

If she late got a job, the amount she received plus her salary would be X. And, of course, when her salary surpassed X, the government amount would stop. The idea would be to provide a basic level of support, but at least some encouragement to do better.

LBJ turned childbirth into a business and destroyed the Black family with a little ditty called “The War on Poverty”. Bernie wants to bring that back.

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:

I agree with Rebecca....and so should you.

Wee Willy that is sad. There are a lot of low income families who need financial help, and you would want these kids going hungry. You are twisted, You need help. you are what's wrong with America

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

jimpack123 wrote:

Wee Willy that is sad. There are a lot of low income families who need financial help, and you would want these kids going hungry. You are twisted, You need help. you are what's wrong with America

I wonder if these so called “low income” families can still manage to buy cigarettes?

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

amadjuster wrote:

I wonder if these so called “low income” families can still manage to buy cigarettes?

If you feed the children then they can learn and grow up ,get a job , break the cycle . how many of you righties here on OPP give food to the food shelters just curious. . Amadjuster try adjusting your heart for a change.

Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas

amadjuster wrote:

I wonder if these so called “low income” families can still manage to buy cigarettes?

Good point, these low income folks also purchase a fair amount of marijuana and alcohol.

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

Wolf counselor wrote:

Good point, these low income folks also purchase a fair amount of marijuana and alcohol.

I bet you consider Social Security entilements also

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

jimpack123 wrote:

Wee Willy that is sad. There are a lot of low income families who need financial help, and you would want these kids going hungry. You are twisted, You need help. you are what's wrong with America

No...whats wrong with America is you whine about starving children....then your team trys to import as many as possible adding the that number that are unable to feed themselves..

You need help as you seem to be blind of what you are creating. ....you feed that never ending stream, not my job, i raised mine without any help.....handle it pack...it's all yours.

Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas

jimpack123 wrote:

I bet you consider Social Security entilements also

Stay on topic goober. We're talking hungry children.