One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
For veterans
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Jun 19, 2014 13:34:37   #
bahmer
 
Ordered the White House f**g flown at
half-staff for the Sikhs that were k**led. There is a deep disgust, a fury, growing in the ranks of the military
against the indifferent incompetence of this president.
It has taken on a dangerous tone. No one knows what to do about him, but the anger runs deep as the deaths continue with no strategic end in sight to the idiocy of this war.

Obama has had 5 years to end this futile insanity, during which time he has vacationed, golfed, campaigned, and generally ignored the plight
of our men and women in uniform.

But, there is now a movement afoot in the armed services to launch a massive get out the v**e drive
against this president's party. Not just current active duty types, but the National Guard, Reserves, the retired,
and all other prior service members. This is no small special interest group, but many millions of veterans
who can have an enormous impact on the outcome of the November 2014 mid-term e******n, if they all
respond.
The one million military retirees in Florida alone could mean an overwhelming victory in that state if they
all show up at the polls.

It might not keep another one hundred U.S. troops from dying between now and November, but a turnout to v**e
by the military against this heart breaking lack of leadership can make a powerful statement that hastens
a change to the indifference of this shallow little man who just lets our soldiers die.

Veterans: Please forward to your lists.
High Priority!

Reply
Jun 19, 2014 14:42:49   #
grey gringo Loc: South Texas
 
I seem to remember that military personel overseas were not allowed to v**e in the last e******n, mainly because the b****ts were not taken to them so that they could v**e. It was described in the MSM as a logistical failure, whenn it was outright denial of v****g rights.
bahmer wrote:
Ordered the White House f**g flown at
half-staff for the Sikhs that were k**led. There is a deep disgust, a fury, growing in the ranks of the military
against the indifferent incompetence of this president.
It has taken on a dangerous tone. No one knows what to do about him, but the anger runs deep as the deaths continue with no strategic end in sight to the idiocy of this war.

Obama has had 5 years to end this futile insanity, during which time he has vacationed, golfed, campaigned, and generally ignored the plight
of our men and women in uniform.

But, there is now a movement afoot in the armed services to launch a massive get out the v**e drive
against this president's party. Not just current active duty types, but the National Guard, Reserves, the retired,
and all other prior service members. This is no small special interest group, but many millions of veterans
who can have an enormous impact on the outcome of the November 2014 mid-term e******n, if they all
respond.
The one million military retirees in Florida alone could mean an overwhelming victory in that state if they
all show up at the polls.

It might not keep another one hundred U.S. troops from dying between now and November, but a turnout to v**e
by the military against this heart breaking lack of leadership can make a powerful statement that hastens
a change to the indifference of this shallow little man who just lets our soldiers die.

Veterans: Please forward to your lists.
High Priority!
Ordered the White House f**g flown at br half-staf... (show quote)

Reply
Jun 19, 2014 14:46:13   #
bahmer
 
grey gringo wrote:
I seem to remember that military personel overseas were not allowed to v**e in the last e******n, mainly because the b****ts were not taken to them so that they could v**e. It was described in the MSM as a logistical failure, whenn it was outright denial of v****g rights.


You are right and that was the travesty to our military contrary to what Alicia believes I think that the military cannot stand Obama and those v**es alone may have changed things for Obama.

Reply
 
 
Jun 19, 2014 14:51:28   #
Constitutional libertarian Loc: St Croix National Scenic River Way
 
bahmer wrote:
Ordered the White House f**g flown at
half-staff for the Sikhs that were k**led. There is a deep disgust, a fury, growing in the ranks of the military
against the indifferent incompetence of this president.
It has taken on a dangerous tone. No one knows what to do about him, but the anger runs deep as the deaths continue with no strategic end in sight to the idiocy of this war.

Obama has had 5 years to end this futile insanity, during which time he has vacationed, golfed, campaigned, and generally ignored the plight
of our men and women in uniform.

But, there is now a movement afoot in the armed services to launch a massive get out the v**e drive
against this president's party. Not just current active duty types, but the National Guard, Reserves, the retired,
and all other prior service members. This is no small special interest group, but many millions of veterans
who can have an enormous impact on the outcome of the November 2014 mid-term e******n, if they all
respond.
The one million military retirees in Florida alone could mean an overwhelming victory in that state if they
all show up at the polls.

It might not keep another one hundred U.S. troops from dying between now and November, but a turnout to v**e
by the military against this heart breaking lack of leadership can make a powerful statement that hastens
a change to the indifference of this shallow little man who just lets our soldiers die.

Veterans: Please forward to your lists.
High Priority!
Ordered the White House f**g flown at br half-staf... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Jun 19, 2014 22:01:08   #
Brian Devon
 
bahmer wrote:
You are right and that was the travesty to our military contrary to what Alicia believes I think that the military cannot stand Obama and those v**es alone may have changed things for Obama.




************
Presidents are commanders-in-chief of the U.S. military. It is necessary that they secure the majority of the e*******l v**es. It is not necessary that they be the first choice of those serving in the military. I am sure many of the long gone generals would have preferred a President Patton or President MacArthur. There were reasons it never happened. Many Americans were very o.k. with that.

Reply
Jun 19, 2014 22:09:25   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
Brian Devon wrote:
************
Presidents are commanders-in-chief of the U.S. military. It is necessary that they secure the majority of the e*******l v**es. It is not necessary that they be the first choice of those serving in the military. I am sure many of the long gone generals would have preferred a President Patton or President MacArthur. There were reasons it never happened. Many Americans were very o.k. with that.


Another excellent diversion. You are a true pro at adding nothing to the topic...well, except the talking points.

The President is [sic]"commanders-in-chef" of the military; however, it does not guarantee support of those individuals.

Reply
Jun 19, 2014 22:45:33   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Brian Devon wrote:
************
Presidents are commanders-in-chief of the U.S. military. It is necessary that they secure the majority of the e*******l v**es. It is not necessary that they be the first choice of those serving in the military. I am sure many of the long gone generals would have preferred a President Patton or President MacArthur. There were reasons it never happened. Many Americans were very o.k. with that.


So the deflector in chief doesn't know about what has happened with military v**es? Yes, they were stopped because they didn't arrive many places in time to be cast and returned. Are you smart enough to realize that many military wives are overseas with their husbands and don't get counted either.

Simpletons really think that military v**es in all 50 v**es could sway the outcome of who gets the e*******l v**es. There are plenty in the liberal thinkers who know you are wholly wrong about that so they do anything to keep those military people from v****g.

Reply
 
 
Jun 19, 2014 22:47:05   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
AuntiE wrote:
Another excellent diversion. You are a true pro at adding nothing to the topic...well, except the talking points.

The President is [sic]"commanders-in-chef" of the military; however, it does not guarantee support of those individuals.


I have begun calling BD the master deflector since he is surely that and works so hard to do it. Maybe I should change that to the master bator.

Reply
Jun 19, 2014 22:47:24   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
oldroy wrote:
I have begun calling BD the master deflector since he is surely that and works so hard to do it. Maybe I should change that to the master baiter.

Reply
Jun 20, 2014 06:14:38   #
rjoeholl
 
The reason there was no President Patton or President McArthur is because there was a President EISENHOWER.
Brian Devon wrote:
************
Presidents are commanders-in-chief of the U.S. military. It is necessary that they secure the majority of the e*******l v**es. It is not necessary that they be the first choice of those serving in the military. I am sure many of the long gone generals would have preferred a President Patton or President MacArthur. There were reasons it never happened. Many Americans were very o.k. with that.

Reply
Jun 20, 2014 16:27:02   #
Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana
 
AuntiE wrote:
Another excellent diversion. You are a true pro at adding nothing to the topic...well, except the talking points.

The President is [sic]"commanders-in-chef" of the military; however, it does not guarantee support of those individuals.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Jun 20, 2014 17:51:41   #
bahmer
 
AuntiE wrote:
Another excellent diversion. You are a true pro at adding nothing to the topic...well, except the talking points.

The President is [sic]"commanders-in-chef" of the military; however, it does not guarantee support of those individuals.


Amen AuntiE, whenever Obama goes to a military base and gives his little loser speeches the silence is deafening. He takes pauses where there is supposed to be clapping and "crickets" he ends his speech and awaits applause's and and again "crickets". He doesn't get the message at all as he somehow thinks that he is owed respect from all of military and hasn't realized it is earned respect. And that evil Bush somehow was able to garner standing ovations both upon his arrival as well as during the speech and wen he left after the speech. The same was true of Reagan.

Reply
Jun 20, 2014 18:30:42   #
William Ehlert
 
I see a distinct difference in the post of those who believe America owes the vets respect and an i***t that thinks their v**es do not count!

If we have commanders in chief who did serve, there is a complete difference in opinions, those who did serve have the right to their opinions. Those who do not serve use the freedom servicemen gave them (freedom of speech) to say, we don't or shouldn't have ours, BS!

Reply
Jun 21, 2014 11:06:04   #
Viet Nam Vet 67-68
 
PASS THIS TO EVERY AMERICAN YOU KNOW AND REMEMBER OBAMINATION IS A SUNNI MUSLIM!


WHAT IS AN INFIDEL ?

This is a true story and the author,

Rick Mathes, is a well-known

Leader in prison ministry


The man who walks with God always gets to his

destination. If you have a pulse you have a purpose

The Muslim religion is the fastest growing religion per

capita in the United States , especially in the minority

races!!

Last month I attended my annual training session

that's required for maintaining my state prison security
clearance...


During the training session there was a presentation by

three speakers representing the Roman Catholic, Protestant

and Muslim faiths, who each explained their beliefs.

I was particularly interested in what the Islamic had

to say. The Muslim gave a great presentation of the basics
of Islam, complete with a video. After the presentations,
time was provided for questions and answers then it was my
turn. I directed my question to the Muslim and asked:

'Please, correct me if I'm wrong, but I
understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have
declared a holy jihad [Holy war] against the infidels of the
world and, that by k*****g an infidel, (which is a command
to all Muslims) they are assured of a place in heaven. If
that's the case, can you give me the definition of an
infidel?'

There was no disagreement with my statements and,
without hesitation, he replied, ' Non-believers! '
I responded, 'So, let me make sure I have this
straight. All followers of Allah have been commanded to k**l
everyone who is not of your faith so they can have a place
in heaven.



Is that correct?'

The expression on his face changed from one of

authority and command to that of a little boy who had just

been caught with his hand in the cookie jar. He sheepishly

replied, 'Yes.'

I then stated, 'Well, sir, I have a real problem

trying to imagine The Pope commanding all Catholics to k**l

those of your faith or Dr. Stanley ordering all Protestants

to do the same in order to guarantee them a place in

heaven!'

The Muslim was speechless! I continued,'I also have

a problem with being your friend when you and your brother

clerics are telling your followers to k**l me!
Let me ask you a question:

Would you rather have your Allah, who tells you to k**l

me in order for you to go to heaven, or my Jesus who tells

me to love you because I am going to heaven and He wants you

to be there with me?'

You could have heard a pin drop as



The Imam hung his head in shame.

Needless to say, the organizers and/or promoters of the

'Diversification' training seminar were not happy

with my way of dealing with the Islamic Imam, and exposing

the t***h about the Muslims' beliefs.

In twenty years there will be enough Muslim v**ers in

the U.S. To elect the President!


I think everyone in the U.S. Should be required to read
this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely
publicized, unless each of us sends it on!


This is your chance to make a difference....


FOR CHRIST'S SAKE.....SEND THIS ON . .


"I will restore to you the years the locusts have
eaten"

Joel 2:25

Reply
Jun 21, 2014 19:00:52   #
William Ehlert
 
Let's see, I seem to remember a couple, Washington, but he should'nt count because he really was the commander in chief. He rode his horse into battles with the enemy, many times.

In fact after his Army battled in the Indian Wars, one of the chiefs of the tribes said, he personally shot at President Washington 6 times. He said, he had to have hit him several times. After that battle Washington's coat had bullets holes in the front that exited out the back, yet he never got hit!

I seem to remember another who charged up a hill in the Spanish American War. But again he shouldn't count either. Could we mention, maybe a PT boat commander from WWII named John F Kennedy.

Maybe, I kind of remember another WWII President that was shot down in one of the greatest battles from it. I think I remember, his name was George H W Bush.

Let's remember another Commander in chief, I kind of think he commanded men that fought against socialists when they stormed the beaches of Normandy! Wasn't his name, shortened by men who fought under him? Yes, I think they called him Ike.

I for one think some of our best Presidents, not only served but were known as Warrior's in battle an when they held the office, the fighting men honored them, while they were Commander in chief

I remember another, who while I took my chances in War, though most of my off time, I was drunk, while I was on duty, I never refused a hard assignment. This other though was a coward.

So much was this in bread that the first fight our military fought under him, he tucked our tail between his legs and ran from the battle. As a correct result of not letting our real fighting men stamp him into non existence.

That man who scared this man commanding the greatest fighting force in the world, was the one, who this President fired missiles into the desert to k**l him, but first warned them first, he was doing it. Darn the missiles missed, wonder why.

Maybe the President was distracted by a skirt, or did he fire the missiles to distract us from the skirt? I kind of think he was afraid of hurting this man, that later lead the attack taking down the twin towers and the other five buildings making the worlds trade center.

To think, if this man had a spine in Somalia, we would not have seen 911 take down those towers. When we fought in Afghanistan, as this warrior retreated said, if he had known we would do what we did, he would not have attacked the United States of America!

Have you ever heard of peace through strength? It was called walk tall and carry a big stick. When President George W Bush went to War, he used that big stick and a man named Quadafi, swore not to fight anymore.

Women who had been oppressed by wicked men found freedoms they never dreamed of. Children could go to school and girls were able to go to school also. People embraced the freedom's given to them and many welcomed the coalition forces.

Al Qaeda was scrabled as a fighting force and we held the enemy on the run. They hid in foreign nations.

Today's leader, let Islamists take Egypt, then helps terrorists o*******w Libia, Syria, all of a sudden is put into a civil War, and the commander in chief plays golf with a golfing legend, goes on all the TV night time talk shows.

Mean while, the Arab spring goes ballistic. We give all kinds of stinger missiles which can take down civilian jets to extremists fighters. We should have been giving them out but not whole sale.

We give Billions of dollars to Muslims in weaponry and just walk away as if, terrorists won't end up with real bad stuff. When Bush took out Saddam, there were no weapons of has destruction but now we find em.

Today the liberal press to cover up the blunders being made say, these deadly weapons are so degraded, terrorists cannot use them. There are i***ts talking about something they have no idea, what they talk about.

Terrorists do not think like liberals, they are willing to die to k**l you. I ask you to think about what degraded means. It means these are too dangerous to move because the shell casings have rusted through.

In plain language, that means intelligent people are affraif to move them while a terrorist will use a broom and dustpan to sweep up the mess to put into a bomb.

We better take a longer look and remember the words of a song, there is a man with a gun in his hand, over there. The problem is, while our President golfs and stumps for dollars to fill the Democratic war chest, men with brooms are filling theirs, and we need to eliminate the stuff before it ever leaves for here.

A Commander in Chief, sucks it up and sends our boys, over there before we fight them here again. God forbid we wait till S. Hillary Clinton takes office because her husband showed a yellow streak and every terrorist will make that yellow streak a target point.

We also, Must secure our borders, at all costs. Not only do we face nuclear dirty bombs, but soon real nuclear bombs. Beyond that, now they have sarin gas in quantity plus a WWI h**ed, Mustard gas that can k**l hundreds of thousands here in the good old US of A.

No problem though, we are instructed to do as liberals do, dig a little hole in the dirt and stick your head in the hole, to talk with your comrades and don't worry about it, because that can k**l you too!















 

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.