Democrat's Are Like A Schoolyard Bully: They have wanted to run roughshod over the process, but when the opposition stands up to them they silence them and accuse others of what they...

Liberty Tree

They have wanted to run roughshod over the process, but when the opposition stands up to them they silence them and accuse others of what they are themselves. Like a bully the one thing they fear is a fair encounter.

Seth

Liberty Tree wrote:

They have wanted to run roughshod over the process, but when the opposition stands up to them they silence them and accuse others of what they are themselves. Like a bully the one thing they fear is a fair encounter.

That's probably why, when there was an American C*******t Party, the only people who joined were Democrats.

What they do today reeks of wannabe C*******ts.

Airforceone

Let’s see not one witness for Trump was willing to testify under oath. The career officials and Trumps own appointees testify that he is a criminal and all you have is to complain about the process when it was republicans that established the rules of these hearings when they went after all those phony Obama scandals where you found nothing.

So let’s take a look the committee that has a constitutional right to create an impeachment inquiry. Now if this was brought to a court of law the committee is the prosecutor and they called these witnesses to the stand to testify under oath. The testimony was clear and the facts were presented to the jury. Now it’s the defenses turn to lay out there case and show that the defendant is innocent. They have no witnesses and all they did was complain about the process of the trail. Not only that the defense wants to subpeana the judge because they did not like his rulings so how long do you think it would take that jury to convict.

All Trump did was tweet about a h**x the republicans used Russian propaganda and Fox News conspiracy and lies about the facts. But not one person within the White House was willing to raise there right hand and testify under oath for Trump. Trump refused to turn over any documents except for a phone transcript that was written by White House attorneys.

So how long would it take a jury to convict.

Tweets, lies, misinformation, conspiracy theories Russian Propaganda and not one of these people were willing to testify under oath.

Rough shot over the process you had the opportunity to submit your evidence that Trump did nothing wrong but all you had was attack the witnesses, attack the process and that alone is an admission of guilt.

That is a typical process in any case when you can’t argue the facts of the case you argue the process but I hope the AMERICAN people can see what the Republican Party has become when they act like children scream and yell like schoolyard kids and offer no evidence.

Seth

Airforceone wrote:

Let’s see not one witness for Trump was willing to testify under oath. The career officials and Trumps own appointees testify that he is a criminal and all you have is to complain about the process when it was republicans that established the rules of these hearings when they went after all those phony Obama scandals where you found nothing.

So let’s take a look the committee that has a constitutional right to create an impeachment inquiry. Now if this was brought to a court of law the committee is the prosecutor and they called these witnesses to the stand to testify under oath. The testimony was clear and the facts were presented to the jury. Now it’s the defenses turn to lay out there case and show that the defendant is innocent. They have no witnesses and all they did was complain about the process of the trail. Not only that the defense wants to subpeana the judge because they did not like his rulings so how long do you think it would take that jury to convict.

All Trump did was tweet about a h**x the republicans used Russian propaganda and Fox News conspiracy and lies about the facts. But not one person within the White House was willing to raise there right hand and testify under oath for Trump. Trump refused to turn over any documents except for a phone transcript that was written by White House attorneys.

So how long would it take a jury to convict.

Tweets, lies, misinformation, conspiracy theories Russian Propaganda and not one of these people were willing to testify under oath.

Rough shot over the process you had the opportunity to submit your evidence that Trump did nothing wrong but all you had was attack the witnesses, attack the process and that alone is an admission of guilt.

That is a typical process in any case when you can’t argue the facts of the case you argue the process but I hope the AMERICAN people can see what the Republican Party has become when they act like children scream and yell like schoolyard kids and offer no evidence.

Let’s see not one witness for Trump was willing to... (show quote)

The call transcript and the Ukranian president told the entire story -- no "quid pro quo," no "bribery," nothing but all the evidence actually needed to show that the Democrats are full of pterodactyl droppings.

Dwight Logan

Liberty Tree wrote:

They have wanted to run roughshod over the process, but when the opposition stands up to them they silence them and accuse others of what they are themselves. Like a bully the one thing they fear is a fair encounter.

Like most bullies they are full of bully poop

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

Airforceone wrote:

Let’s see not one witness for Trump was willing to testify under oath. The career officials and Trumps own appointees testify that he is a criminal and all you have is to complain about the process when it was republicans that established the rules of these hearings when they went after all those phony Obama scandals where you found nothing.

So let’s take a look the committee that has a constitutional right to create an impeachment inquiry. Now if this was brought to a court of law the committee is the prosecutor and they called these witnesses to the stand to testify under oath. The testimony was clear and the facts were presented to the jury. Now it’s the defenses turn to lay out there case and show that the defendant is innocent. They have no witnesses and all they did was complain about the process of the trail. Not only that the defense wants to subpeana the judge because they did not like his rulings so how long do you think it would take that jury to convict.

All Trump did was tweet about a h**x the republicans used Russian propaganda and Fox News conspiracy and lies about the facts. But not one person within the White House was willing to raise there right hand and testify under oath for Trump. Trump refused to turn over any documents except for a phone transcript that was written by White House attorneys.

So how long would it take a jury to convict.

Tweets, lies, misinformation, conspiracy theories Russian Propaganda and not one of these people were willing to testify under oath.

Rough shot over the process you had the opportunity to submit your evidence that Trump did nothing wrong but all you had was attack the witnesses, attack the process and that alone is an admission of guilt.

That is a typical process in any case when you can’t argue the facts of the case you argue the process but I hope the AMERICAN people can see what the Republican Party has become when they act like children scream and yell like schoolyard kids and offer no evidence.

Let’s see not one witness for Trump was willing to... (show quote)

When your first sentence is a lie we know what follows. Your first sentence is "Let’s see not one witness for Trump was willing to testify under oath."

There is so much more I'd like to say to you but it's better to allow you continue to show your butt than to show my own expressing my distaste for you. You are not worth it.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

I have to say, you orange guys do live in a different world.. Pitiful..

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

permafrost wrote:

I have to say, you orange guys do live in a different world.. Pitiful..

That's because, unlike your meme, the greatest scandal was taking place by Progressives in the House of Representatives. All those Progressives lawyers lynching a President with Soviet style procedures and alleged crimes they know a judge in a criminal court would never permit in the courtroom. Dear people, understand if Progressives are ever allowed full power we will lose our freedom. Believe it!

debeda

Airforceone wrote:

Let’s see not one witness for Trump was willing to testify under oath. The career officials and Trumps own appointees testify that he is a criminal and all you have is to complain about the process when it was republicans that established the rules of these hearings when they went after all those phony Obama scandals where you found nothing.

So let’s take a look the committee that has a constitutional right to create an impeachment inquiry. Now if this was brought to a court of law the committee is the prosecutor and they called these witnesses to the stand to testify under oath. The testimony was clear and the facts were presented to the jury. Now it’s the defenses turn to lay out there case and show that the defendant is innocent. They have no witnesses and all they did was complain about the process of the trail. Not only that the defense wants to subpeana the judge because they did not like his rulings so how long do you think it would take that jury to convict.

All Trump did was tweet about a h**x the republicans used Russian propaganda and Fox News conspiracy and lies about the facts. But not one person within the White House was willing to raise there right hand and testify under oath for Trump. Trump refused to turn over any documents except for a phone transcript that was written by White House attorneys.

So how long would it take a jury to convict.

Tweets, lies, misinformation, conspiracy theories Russian Propaganda and not one of these people were willing to testify under oath.

Rough shot over the process you had the opportunity to submit your evidence that Trump did nothing wrong but all you had was attack the witnesses, attack the process and that alone is an admission of guilt.

That is a typical process in any case when you can’t argue the facts of the case you argue the process but I hope the AMERICAN people can see what the Republican Party has become when they act like children scream and yell like schoolyard kids and offer no evidence.

Let’s see not one witness for Trump was willing to... (show quote)

debeda

Dwight Logan wrote:

Like most bullies they are full of bully poop

Well said

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

padremike wrote:

That's because, unlike your meme, the greatest scandal was taking place by Progressives in the House of Representatives. All those Progressives lawyers lynching a President with Soviet style procedures and alleged crimes they know a judge in a criminal court would never permit in the courtroom. Dear people, understand if Progressives are ever allowed full power we will lose our freedom. Believe it!

LOL,,, Even you guys know that the "soviet style" is false, Putin will never allow his puppet to go through that until he is done with him..

bahmer

Liberty Tree wrote:

They have wanted to run roughshod over the process, but when the opposition stands up to them they silence them and accuse others of what they are themselves. Like a bully the one thing they fear is a fair encounter.

Amen and Amen

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

permafrost wrote:

LOL,,, Even you guys know that the "soviet style" is false, Putin will never allow his puppet to go through that until he is done with him..

Not false at all! Allow me to expose what you folks are and not one single one of you on this forum differ except one of which I'm aware. In the Progressive mind, "trump is judged guilty of every charge and if the t***h were known he has committed many more worse crimes we don't yet know about and he needs to be impeached, convicted and fitted with an orange jump suit. " Pretty much sums it up? There is no need for a trial; you birds already adjudicated Trump guilty. A trial would only be an unnecessary formality; his guilt you have already predetermined. This is the Progressive Soviet style of justice.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

padremike wrote:

Not false at all! Allow me to expose what you fol... (show quote)

You have a strange mind mike , not doing well for you..

A clear and obvious criminal, long before he was placed in office and done the deeds confessed in his own words on video and yet you attempt to shift and deflect any blame at all.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

permafrost wrote:

You have a strange mind mike , not doing well for you..

A clear and obvious criminal, long before he was placed in office and done the deeds confessed in his own words on video and yet you attempt to shift and deflect any blame at all.

You stating "he was a clear and obvious criminal long before he was placed in office" confirms exactly what I just said about you. If his corporation has committed one crime, and He paid a penalty, then he must be guilty of all crimes Progressives "feel" he committed. Look to your own poisoned mind and make the necessary adjustments..