One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Three "honest" witnesses, discussing the constitution
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Dec 4, 2019 15:46:45   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Three advocates for impeaching Trump.

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 15:53:09   #
Carol Kelly
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Three advocates for impeaching Trump.


But Roby from Alabama is a voice in the wilderness! Congratulations to her.

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 15:53:40   #
Liberty Tree
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Three advocates for impeaching Trump.


Three liberal Trump h**ers carefully selected by Democrats. Any objective person can see that.

Reply
 
 
Dec 4, 2019 15:54:33   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Carol Kelly wrote:
But Roby from Alabama is a voice in the wilderness! Congratulations to her.


She made a good statement.

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 15:56:34   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Three liberal Trump h**ers carefully selected by Democrats. Any objective person can see that.


You can hear and even see the h**e in them, especially Karlan. Wow!

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 15:56:49   #
Carol Kelly
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Three liberal Trump h**ers carefully selected by Democrats. Any objective person can see that.


Yes, someone pointed out that Turley was the only one who didn’t walk in with his mind firmly made up to impeach.
The House was not the only voice heard. Our voices were heard in 2016.

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 16:01:46   #
woodguru
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Three advocates for impeaching Trump.

And a fourth one peddling GOP rhetorically meaningless defenses in order to create the talking points narratives for FOX and RW media.

Reply
 
 
Dec 4, 2019 16:02:19   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Gaetz was awesome.

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 16:04:39   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
And now, the president 'hoping" for something is the same thing as asking. LOL!

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 16:06:02   #
woodguru
 
Carol Kelly wrote:
Yes, someone pointed out that Turley was the only one who didn’t walk in with his mind firmly made up to impeach.
The House was not the only voice heard. Our voices were heard in 2016.

Are you guys really this ignorant? Of course they have made up their minds, this isn't the stage where they are trying to figure out what happened, this is the stage where they are laying out the evidence and stating what it means.

Now, the GOP needs to hear what is being said and pull their heads out of the place where they have already decided trump has done nothing he deserves to be impeached about. This is for them to hear and respond accordingly to, not maintain positions where they have already made up their minds.

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 16:08:06   #
woodguru
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Gaetz was awesome.

That is your idea of awesome? No wonder you can completely idolize trump

Reply
 
 
Dec 4, 2019 16:09:26   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Carol Kelly wrote:
But Roby from Alabama is a voice in the wilderness! Congratulations to her.


Matt Gaetz was great also!!!

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 16:13:15   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Actually all Republicans .are great!!!

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 16:15:06   #
woodguru
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
And now, the president 'hoping" for something is the same thing as asking. LOL!

Actually there are a lot of people around trump who would consider "I am hoping...", or "I would like...", or "it would be nice if..." to be marching orders, and a new president desperate for military aid would consider anything trump wants to be just that.

Anyone trying to spin the pressure trump and Giuliani were putting on the Ukraine is simply being willfully obtuse. This is not encapsulated to the phone call, it involves months of obstructing military aid that is being well documented and corroborated, and I still say it was because Putin did not want US anti tank weapons being used on Russian mercenaries and tanks when they attacked the eastern Ukraine.

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 16:16:37   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
woodguru wrote:
That is your idea of awesome? No wonder you can completely idolize trump


Gaetz was able to highlight the anti-Trump bias of these "constitutional experts." Feldmann even claimed that the constitution defined bribery. How stupid. They had all three make off hand comments to the effect that the committee should v**e to impeach the president, Ms Karlon most vehemently. Gaetz brought that to the forefront. None of them now have any credibility in their "interpretation" of the constitution because they are emotionally involved in wanting to unseat Trump; not intellectually but emotionally.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.