One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Authoritarianism and Donald J Trump
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
Dec 1, 2019 08:10:10   #
Singularity
 
amadjuster wrote:
You quote Rachel Maddow? Really?

Most people put their best argument first as a matter of time/economy of effort. Yours is to vaguely attack the messengers, as you find the message is unassailable?

Really?

Reply
Dec 1, 2019 08:38:01   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
Singularity wrote:
Most people put their best argument first as a matter of time/economy of effort. Yours is to vaguely attack the messengers, as you find the message is unassailable?

Really?


Rachel is about as slanted as Charley Chan's eyes.

Reply
Dec 1, 2019 08:48:04   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
amadjuster wrote:
Rachel is about as slanted as Charley Chan's eyes.


Maddow promoted the Collusion Delusion as a religion.

Maddow lied to her subjects as a rule of operation.

I call her the "high priestess" of the cult of lies.

Reply
 
 
Dec 1, 2019 09:20:42   #
Singularity
 
byronglimish wrote:
Maddow promoted the Collusion Delusion as a religion.

Maddow lied to her subjects as a rule of operation.

I call her the "high priestess" of the cult of lies.


Again, your attack is weak, directed at the messengers, ignoring at your peril the the point of the argument.

Trump and friends are deliberately misquoting and distorting Pelosi's statement and its clear meaning. You are having a freaky field day with a f**e news phantom of your own design. Who needs Maddow, Charlie Chan or Devon Nunes' Mom?

or even their cow?

Reply
Dec 1, 2019 10:13:19   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Singularity wrote:
Again, your attack is weak, directed at the messengers, ignoring at your peril the the point of the argument.

Trump and friends are deliberately misquoting and distorting Pelosi's statement and its clear meaning. You are having a freaky field day with a f**e news phantom of your own design. Who needs Maddow, Charlie Chan or Devon Nunes' Mom?

or even their cow?




Ok, let's make this general.

Rachel Maddow isn't solely responsible for spreading h**e filled slander against the duly elected President of the United States.

You are smart. Check out "when" the impeachment spew began...

It's been nothing but S******n and Subterfuge to smell the place up with Chaos and Confusion.

What was the specific purpose of the Muellersphere, where Adam Schiff lied to the American people and promised he had evidence of criminal behavior between Trump and Russia.

Mueller came out and proved Schiff a liar...

What's amazing...you folks are still believing in Schiff.

So no, I don't want to attack a messenger for revealing t***hful commentary.

But I do vehemently oppose all people of Maddows religion of falsehoods...

Reply
Dec 1, 2019 11:15:21   #
Singularity
 
byronglimish wrote:
Ok, let's make this general.

Rachel Maddow isn't solely responsible for spreading h**e filled slander against the duly elected President of the United States.

You are smart. Check out "when" the impeachment spew began...

It's been nothing but S******n and Subterfuge to smell the place up with Chaos and Confusion.

What was the specific purpose of the Muellersphere, where Adam Schiff lied to the American people and promised he had evidence of criminal behavior between Trump and Russia.

Mueller came out and proved Schiff a liar...

What's amazing...you folks are still believing in Schiff.

So no, I don't want to attack a messenger for revealing t***hful commentary.

But I do vehemently oppose all people of Maddows religion of falsehoods...
Ok, let's make this general. br br Rachel Maddow ... (show quote)


So, we've spent the morning deflected and distracted from the point I made, that the original assertion that Speaker Pelosi objected to democratically run e******ns was clearly dishonestly misconstrued and purported by Mr. Trump and his mouthpieces.

Good show, but I'm getting tired of reruns.

Pelosi was clear. As I stated elsewhere, in a thread regarding Trump corruption, let me repeat in this thread about Trump's problematic authoritarianism; since Trump has bribed (an)other country(ies) to screw with the e******n results in his favor, AGAIN(?), how is he to be trusted to participate fairly in the 2020 race?

Its not the e******n per se that drew her comment. Its the e******n r*****g by Trump that is to be opposed.

Reply
Dec 1, 2019 11:15:33   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
PeterS wrote:
The wonders of authoritarianism...


Petey!
Get a grip on reality.

So God made a liberal.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/EUzMPlQb2G4

Reply
 
 
Dec 1, 2019 11:18:30   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
byronglimish wrote:
You are desperately seeking what you'll never even have an actual say in.

Donald Trump will be reelected as President of the Republic.

All of your meaningless posts trying to slander the President, is like you trying to piss on California wild fires.

It won't change a thing.

Are you aware that repetitive mouth flatulence by Demoproggies is actually building support for the President?

You and the other Schitt Shows got nothing, but self destruction.


"You and the other Schitt Shows got nothing, but self destruction."

Speaking or Schitt!

Great portrayals of Schifty:
Gutfeld on Adams Schiff's lies
(go to minute 2)
https://youtu.be/3wKEnKoc1x8

Gutfeld on the impeachment circus
https://youtu.be/2mHgJxTmWwA?list=TLPQMTQxMTIwMTl36ctge-TfsA

Reply
Dec 1, 2019 11:22:25   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Singularity wrote:
So, we've spent the morning deflected and distracted from the point I made, that the original assertion that Speaker Pelosi objected to democratically run e******ns was clearly dishonestly misconstrued and purported by Mr. Trump and his mouthpieces.

Good show, but I'm getting tired of reruns.


But we haven't got to the episode where the castaways reenact the storm that wrecked the S.S.MINNOW.

Remember? Gilligan didn't have the anchor attached to the rope.

I've got chores to do.

Reply
Dec 1, 2019 11:27:54   #
Singularity
 
byronglimish wrote:
But we haven't got to the episode where the castaways reenact the storm that wrecked the S.S.MINNOW.

Remember? Gilligan didn't have the anchor attached to the rope.

I've got chores to do.

late addendum to previous....

Pelosi was clear. As I stated elsewhere, in a thread regarding Trump corruption, let me repeat in this thread about Trump's problematic authoritarianism; since Trump has bribed (an)other country(ies) to screw with the e******n results in his favor, AGAIN(?), how is he to be trusted to participate fairly in the 2020 race?

Its not the e******n per se that drew her comment. Its the e******n r*****g by Trump that is to be opposed.

Enjoy your chores.

Reply
Dec 1, 2019 11:38:14   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
Singularity wrote:
"... ...A little after midnight, Donald Trump apparently saw something on Fox News that inspired him to publish a tweet: “Nancy Pelosi just stated that ‘it is dangerous to let the v**ers decide Trump’s fate.’ … In other words, she thinks I’m going to win and doesn’t want to take a chance on letting the v**ers decide.”

The president added, “Wow, she’s CRAZY!”

This morning, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who really ought to know better, picked up on Trump’s line, publishing a similarly misguided missive: “Speaker of the U.S. House of [sic] says its ‘dangerous’ to ‘let the e******n decide’ if [the president] should remain in office. T***slation? ‘We can’t trust backwards, uneducated, everyday people to decide the Presidency, this must be decided by the enlightened people in Washington D.C.’”

"Since this is apparently poised to be the Republican Party's new toy, it's worth pausing to shine a light on reality. Yesterday afternoon, around 2 p.m. (ET), Speaker Pelosi sent a letter to House members on the congressional impeachment inquiry. It read in part:

"... ... The facts are uncontested: that the President abused his power for his own personal, political benefit, at the expense of our national security interests.

"The weak response to these hearings has been, 'Let the e******n decide.' That dangerous position only adds to the urgency of our action, because the President is jeopardizing the integrity of the 2020 e******ns."

Even those with modest reading-comprehension sk**ls can see Pelosi did not write what Trump and Rubio claimed.

On the contrary, the Speaker raised an important point that Trump, Rubio, and other Republicans have struggled to address.

As we discussed last week, a variety of prominent GOP voices -- former Ambassador Nikki Haley, Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-Texas), et al. -- have made the case that lawmakers should skip impeachment proceedings and simply allow the 2020 e******n to decide Trump's fate. If the American e*****rate has a problem with Trump's abuses, they can choose someone new. If v**ers are unmoved by the president's corruption, they make that clear, too.

The trouble, of course, is the nature of the scandal itself. One of the key pillars of the whole controversy has been a simple fact: Trump intended to c***t in the e******n by way of an extortion scheme. The president, rightly or wrongly, saw Joe Biden as a credible e*******l threat, which led him to push a vulnerable foreign ally to cook up some dirt Republicans could use before E******n Day... ..."

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/losing-the-debate-trump-rubio-run-manipulated-pelosi-quote
"... ...A little after midnight, Donald Trump... (show quote)


I suppose you don't, in the least, think having Biden's son on the board of an corrupt gas and petro company , at the time Joe Biden was in control of what went on in the Ukraine. Then the corruption was being investigated by the, I think counselor general or the Ukraine, and this company asked the Obama administration to help them out, wasn't corrupt. Then you have the gall to say that Trump was doing something illegal by asking the Ukrainian government to check into that situation. But I guess those on the left keep providing excuses for anyone in their party that has committed a crime or something close, are being unbiased. Some of those on the left have a sick sense of loyalty for this country.

Reply
 
 
Dec 1, 2019 11:40:04   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Singularity wrote:
late addendum to previous....

Pelosi was clear. As I stated elsewhere, in a thread regarding Trump corruption, let me repeat in this thread about Trump's problematic authoritarianism; since Trump has bribed (an)other country(ies) to screw with the e******n results in his favor, AGAIN(?), how is he to be trusted to participate fairly in the 2020 race?

Its not the e******n per se that drew her comment. Its the e******n r*****g by Trump that is to be opposed.

Enjoy your chores.
late addendum to previous.... br br Pelosi was cl... (show quote)


"Its not the e******n per se that drew her comment. Its the e******n r*****g by Trump that is to be opposed." - Singularity

I doubt you have the integrity, desire, or inclination to get the facts straight, Single.

It is the Left that are untrustworthy when getting honest v**e counts.

Republicans will have to be extra diligent in the 2020 e******ns to make sure we get honest v**e counts.

Reply
Dec 1, 2019 11:44:02   #
77Reaganite Loc: Athens, GA, United States
 
PeterS wrote:
The wonders of authoritarianism...


The only authoritarians are the Democratic party who think they can hold special secret back door impeachment proceedings without taking a v**e but yet Trump is the authoritarian BS! The only thing the Marxist media known is Pravda and Democrats can agree on is that orange man is bad so we must impeach! LOL . How's that working out for you the whole impeachment proceedings are blowing up in your face and every one of your star witness is nothing but a political hack for either the Democratic party or George Soros himself y'all go ahead and keep peddling these lies and as soon as Trump beat you on November 3rd 2020 your party will no longer exist he's going to destroy you just like you said he was going to y'all just didn't want to believe him back in 2016 but now your chickens are coming home to roost!

Reply
Dec 1, 2019 11:44:58   #
Singularity
 
Louie27 wrote:
I suppose you don't, in the least, think having Biden's son on the board of an corrupt gas and petro company , at the time Joe Biden was in control of what went on in the Ukraine. Then the corruption was being investigated by the, I think counselor general or the Ukraine, and this company asked the Obama administration to help them out, wasn't corrupt. Then you have the gall to say that Trump was doing something illegal by asking the Ukrainian government to check into that situation. But I guess those on the left keep providing excuses for anyone in their party that has committed a crime or something close, are being unbiased. Some of those on the left have a sick sense of loyalty for this country.
I suppose you don't, in the least, think having Bi... (show quote)


This silly WHATABOUTISM is another dodge/deflection! Are you simply constitutionally unable to focus enough to stay on one topic? Of course not, it is simply a t***sparent ploy to change the subject because you're uncomfortable that you have no answer to the question originally asked.

Reply
Dec 1, 2019 11:52:48   #
Singularity
 
eagleye13 wrote:
"Its not the e******n per se that drew her comment. Its the e******n r*****g by Trump that is to be opposed." - Singularity

I doubt you have the integrity, desire, or inclination to get the facts straight, Single.

It is the Left that are untrustworthy when getting honest v**e counts.

Republicans will have to be extra diligent in the 2020 e******ns to make sure we get honest v**e counts.


Another conservative dodge/distraction. From all his puerile bellyaching about it, Mister Trump's investigation into e******n tampering by the democrats was a big zero! A nothingburger! Given the results the last few decades of e******ns going back to Gore v Bush and before, showing a clear skewing of the will of the American people expressed by their cumulative v**e tallies versus the E*******l College Results, it is the Republican Party's dedication to gerrymandering and c***ting that more urgently requires prudent correction.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.