Jim Jordan Knocked Down the Testimony of the Two Witnesses.
Chairman Devin Nunes, Rep. Ratcliffe , and the rest of the minority Intelligence Comm, and especially my favorite brilliant Jim Jordan delivered a very compelling arguments that there was no impeachable offense.
POLITICS
Jim Jordan and Others Show How Problematic the Testimony Was Today by Two Witnesses
Under close questioning from Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and others, acting Ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor was shown to have been clearly wrong about his belief that financial aid was held up to Ukraine due to a “quid pro quo” that demanded a public statement on a probe into Burisma by the Ukrainian president.
As Jordan — a member of the House Freedom Caucus — clearly pointed out on Wednesday, the military aid was restored without any public statement by the Ukrainian leadership concerning an investigation into H****r B***n, a son of former Vice President Joe Biden, and Burisma, a natural gas company based in Ukraine.
Thus, the entire Democrat case on impeachment is based on a fallacy and a fantasy — which seeks to prosecute the president of the United States for an act that never happened.
And as Jordan pointed out, the testimony of both George Kent and Bill Taylor on Wednesday would not have been permitted in a court of law because it is all hearsay — i.e., secondhand information.
Neither one of the witnesses who appeared on Wednesday before the House Intelligence Committee — which is run by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) — are claiming any firsthand evidence of p**********l misconduct.
This was no impeachable crime proven by the party of Adam Schitt. Though they made false allegations and revised words and statement to make it appear impeachable crime.
Now back to you radical DEMS**, what do you say?
Radiance3 wrote:
Chairman Devin Nunes, Rep. Ratcliffe , and the rest of the minority Intelligence Comm, and especially my favorite brilliant Jim Jordan delivered a very compelling arguments that there was no impeachable offense.
POLITICS
Jim Jordan and Others Show How Problematic the Testimony Was Today by Two Witnesses
Under close questioning from Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and others, acting Ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor was shown to have been clearly wrong about his belief that financial aid was held up to Ukraine due to a “quid pro quo” that demanded a public statement on a probe into Burisma by the Ukrainian president.
As Jordan — a member of the House Freedom Caucus — clearly pointed out on Wednesday, the military aid was restored without any public statement by the Ukrainian leadership concerning an investigation into H****r B***n, a son of former Vice President Joe Biden, and Burisma, a natural gas company based in Ukraine.
Thus, the entire Democrat case on impeachment is based on a fallacy and a fantasy — which seeks to prosecute the president of the United States for an act that never happened.
And as Jordan pointed out, the testimony of both George Kent and Bill Taylor on Wednesday would not have been permitted in a court of law because it is all hearsay — i.e., secondhand information.
Neither one of the witnesses who appeared on Wednesday before the House Intelligence Committee — which is run by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) — are claiming any firsthand evidence of p**********l misconduct.
This was no impeachable crime proven by the party of Adam Schitt. Though they made false allegations and revised words and statement to make it appear impeachable crime.
Now back to you radical DEMS**, what do you say?
i Chairman Devin Nunes, Rep. Ratcliffe , and the ... (
show quote)
They cannot respond until they consult their favorite ELWNJ sources.
Radiance3 wrote:
Chairman Devin Nunes, Rep. Ratcliffe , and the rest of the minority Intelligence Comm, and especially my favorite brilliant Jim Jordan delivered a very compelling arguments that there was no impeachable offense.
POLITICS
Jim Jordan and Others Show How Problematic the Testimony Was Today by Two Witnesses
Under close questioning from Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and others, acting Ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor was shown to have been clearly wrong about his belief that financial aid was held up to Ukraine due to a “quid pro quo” that demanded a public statement on a probe into Burisma by the Ukrainian president.
As Jordan — a member of the House Freedom Caucus — clearly pointed out on Wednesday, the military aid was restored without any public statement by the Ukrainian leadership concerning an investigation into H****r B***n, a son of former Vice President Joe Biden, and Burisma, a natural gas company based in Ukraine.
Thus, the entire Democrat case on impeachment is based on a fallacy and a fantasy — which seeks to prosecute the president of the United States for an act that never happened.
And as Jordan pointed out, the testimony of both George Kent and Bill Taylor on Wednesday would not have been permitted in a court of law because it is all hearsay — i.e., secondhand information.
Neither one of the witnesses who appeared on Wednesday before the House Intelligence Committee — which is run by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) — are claiming any firsthand evidence of p**********l misconduct.
This was no impeachable crime proven by the party of Adam Schitt. Though they made false allegations and revised words and statement to make it appear impeachable crime.
Now back to you radical DEMS**, what do you say?
i Chairman Devin Nunes, Rep. Ratcliffe , and the ... (
show quote)
I agree wholeheartedly. Jim Jordan did a fantastic job. Gave good arguments during this joke of a hearing. I'm surprised Jordan was allowed to get in there. I guess Pelosi didn't want it to look like a kangaroo court anymore than it does now, but it's hard to paint a different picture. Lots of drama which will come to crashing halt once it gets over to the Senate side and all hopes come crashing down on the Dems. "Dead on Arrival". Will the Dems break out a cry like November 9th? Are they going to need a bigger supply of ho cocoa, and a safe space, and a crying towel/?? And a SHRINK!!!!!! BTW, Jordan was fantastic. He had Amb. Taylor absolutely eating his words I love when the guilty 'verdict' comes first before anything is ever said. Typical by the ass hats on the Left
Radiance3 wrote:
============
Dead on arrival. What a waste of time and taxpayers' money to putting up with this fallacious move. Senator Lindsey might just put this to an end, without Senate hearing. That is what you call "dead on arrival".
Schitt limited his time to 5 minutes only.
And then Schitt gave himself 5 minutes. Never saw a judge say now it's my turn. I get 5 minutes. Best part was 2nd time he said hi didn't know who the whistleblower is. Telling a lie over again is not going to. make it true, Mr. Adam "full of Schiff" How long is this snoozer going to last until they v**e Trump not guilty, not impeachable, and the Democrats have just looked like fools. All of us on the Right should start planning a big party in November and figure out how we can overturn the Amendment so Trump can run for a 3rd term!!! By then, the Dimms will be thanking for "Keeping America Great". haha
I say that you are twisted like a pretzel on Jordan's relentless idiocy.
loveisall wrote:
I say that you are twisted like a pretzel on Jordan's relentless idiocy.
You mean on Schitt's relentless idiocy!!!!
No I mean Jordan and Nunes. Should be ashamed of themselves for spreading lies and trying to deflect from the t***h. Come on...The behavior of our President since the beginning of his campaign has been corroborated by left and right. He is about his own interests and just a wee bit delusional when it comes to the word "perfect." Ok...you can call me names now. I get it. We will never agree on this. Our information comes from different sources. We have our biases. I hope despite all you are a good person. I know I am.
loveisall wrote:
No I mean Jordan and Nunes. Should be ashamed of themselves for spreading lies and trying to deflect from the t***h. Come on...The behavior of our President since the beginning of his campaign has been corroborated by left and right. He is about his own interests and just a wee bit delusional when it comes to the word "perfect." Ok...you can call me names now. I get it. We will never agree on this. Our information comes from different sources. We have our biases. I hope despite all you are a good person. I know I am.
No I mean Jordan and Nunes. Should be ashamed of t... (
show quote)
I'm not going to call you names and I'm sure you are nice person!! You have your opinion and I have mine!! You are right about that!!! The only thing I'm gonna tell you for you to use Quote Reply so that we know who you are talking to !! Or and TRUMP 2020!!!!😀😀
loveisall wrote:
No I mean Jordan and Nunes. Should be ashamed of themselves for spreading lies and trying to deflect from the t***h. Come on...The behavior of our President since the beginning of his campaign has been corroborated by left and right. He is about his own interests and just a wee bit delusional when it comes to the word "perfect." Ok...you can call me names now. I get it. We will never agree on this. Our information comes from different sources. We have our biases. I hope despite all you are a good person. I know I am.
No I mean Jordan and Nunes. Should be ashamed of t... (
show quote)
Sounds like you need a pat on the back.
Maybe someone will pray for you.
loveisall wrote:
No I mean Jordan and Nunes. Should be ashamed of themselves for spreading lies and trying to deflect from the t***h. Come on...The behavior of our President since the beginning of his campaign has been corroborated by left and right. He is about his own interests and just a wee bit delusional when it comes to the word "perfect." Ok...you can call me names now. I get it. We will never agree on this. Our information comes from different sources. We have our biases. I hope despite all you are a good person. I know I am.
No I mean Jordan and Nunes. Should be ashamed of t... (
show quote)
First of all, please use "quote reply" (so we know who you're insulting, joke) You will not deny the fact that first it was, "Russia, Russia, Russia"; then it was 'you guys are going to be DONE when the Mueller report comes out, finished" ~ noting, a big nothingburger; then it was 'girls, girls, girls', than it was a 'recession is just around the corner'; then it was "quid pro quo". And then now that that's all shot to Hell; newest thing is 'bribery'. This guy Schitt is amazing He must dream at night what he's going to come with next to make a feeble attempt at taking down Trump. (I wish he would remember what lies he has told.). It's just one continuous useless feeble attempt to destroy this Presidency and the American e*****rate is worn out with your bulls**t. they've HAD IT. And this bulls**t phony impeachment case is going on number 14 in attempts to knock down this Preisidency. They're offering odds on what's going to be next in Vegas. What a joke you people are on the Left!
Radiance3 wrote:
Chairman Devin Nunes, Rep. Ratcliffe , and the rest of the minority Intelligence Comm, and especially my favorite brilliant Jim Jordan delivered a very compelling arguments that there was no impeachable offense.
POLITICS
Jim Jordan and Others Show How Problematic the Testimony Was Today by Two Witnesses
Under close questioning from Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and others, acting Ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor was shown to have been clearly wrong about his belief that financial aid was held up to Ukraine due to a “quid pro quo” that demanded a public statement on a probe into Burisma by the Ukrainian president.
As Jordan — a member of the House Freedom Caucus — clearly pointed out on Wednesday, the military aid was restored without any public statement by the Ukrainian leadership concerning an investigation into H****r B***n, a son of former Vice President Joe Biden, and Burisma, a natural gas company based in Ukraine.
Thus, the entire Democrat case on impeachment is based on a fallacy and a fantasy — which seeks to prosecute the president of the United States for an act that never happened.
And as Jordan pointed out, the testimony of both George Kent and Bill Taylor on Wednesday would not have been permitted in a court of law because it is all hearsay — i.e., secondhand information.
Neither one of the witnesses who appeared on Wednesday before the House Intelligence Committee — which is run by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) — are claiming any firsthand evidence of p**********l misconduct.
This was no impeachable crime proven by the party of Adam Schitt. Though they made false allegations and revised words and statement to make it appear impeachable crime.
Now back to you radical DEMS**, what do you say?
i Chairman Devin Nunes, Rep. Ratcliffe , and the ... (
show quote)
Are you saying there isn't even first hand information of an un-impeachable act? Well I never!
loveisall wrote:
I say that you are twisted like a pretzel on Jordan's relentless idiocy.
Trump has broken records everywhere for the benefit of the American people. He has done more for citizens than anyone could have dreamed of. And that includes Democrats!!!!!! More money in your pocket and I could go on for an hour. Al Green is right "we had better try to impeach him because we don't have a snowballs chance in Hell of beating him. Might as well go for it's "turn out the lights, the party is over" thk you, Dandy Don. It's Hail Mary time. Too bad you got such a pathetic liar unfair POS to conduct such a moronic joke of a process. I guess Pelosi had a moment of a chnge of heart and Jordan was in ….and he crushed it. she's probably sorry she did that, but she didn't want to appear like the genuine asshole that Schitt is.
fullspinzoo wrote:
And then Schitt gave himself 5 minutes. Never saw a judge say now it's my turn. I get 5 minutes. Best part was 2nd time he said hi didn't know who the whistleblower is. Telling a lie over again is not going to. make it true, Mr. Adam "full of Schiff" How long is this snoozer going to last until they v**e Trump not guilty, not impeachable, and the Democrats have just looked like fools. All of us on the Right should start planning a big party in November and figure out how we can overturn the Amendment so Trump can run for a 3rd term!!! By then, the Dimms will be thanking for "Keeping America Great". haha
And then Schitt gave himself 5 minutes. Never saw... (
show quote)
I think that will be this year's lie of the year, Schiff claiming to not know who the whistle blower is. LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.