One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Now Trump doesn't want Hearings televised.
Page <prev 2 of 2
Nov 8, 2019 20:55:16   #
Cuda2020
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
In 2015, Eric Ciaramella, the CIA analyst who focused on Ukraine and Russia (he speaks Russian, Ukrainian and Arabic), was detailed to the NSC where he worked under Obama's NSA, Susan Rice. Now that we know Ciaramella is Schiff's g***med whistleblower, isn't it interesting that he is cited in a key passage of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report?

And you think this impeachment charade is not a charade.


Truly pathetic all your conspiracies against Trump,and him as pure as a virgin being exploited by his own government and his own people, poor little pathetic victim, right, tell me when are you all going to stop playing that violin and same old whiny song, he’s guilty as sin from beginning to end, but you’ll protect this t*****r to the end and I imagine will try and skuttle the impeachment hearing just as MacConnell has threatened, going against the constitutional process. Shameful

Reply
Nov 8, 2019 22:07:49   #
Lonewolf
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Truly pathetic all your conspiracies against Trump,and him as pure as a virgin being exploited by his own government and his own people, poor little pathetic victim, right, tell me when are you all going to stop playing that violin and same old whiny song, he’s guilty as sin from beginning to end, but you’ll protect this t*****r to the end and I imagine will try and skuttle the impeachment hearing just as MacConnell has threatened, going against the constitutional process. Shameful


:

Reply
Nov 8, 2019 23:52:46   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Truly pathetic all your conspiracies against Trump,and him as pure as a virgin being exploited by his own government and his own people, poor little pathetic victim, right, tell me when are you all going to stop playing that violin and same old whiny song, he’s guilty as sin from beginning to end, but you’ll protect this t*****r to the end and I imagine will try and skuttle the impeachment hearing just as MacConnell has threatened, going against the constitutional process. Shameful
Yes, you are shameful.

The FACTS I posted are not conspiracies nor are they the sound of a violin, so I'll post them again and maybe with a second shot at it you can get it past the dense wall of your skull.

Eric Ciaramella, the CIA analyst who focused on Ukraine and Russia (he speaks Russian, Ukrainian and Arabic), was detailed in 2015 to the NSC where he worked under Obama's NSA, Susan Rice. Now that we know Ciaramella is Schiff's g***med whistleblower, isn't it interesting that he is cited in a key passage of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report?

This tells us that Claramella was inside this covert operation well before president Trump's phone call with president Zelensky.

Reply
 
 
Nov 9, 2019 06:01:57   #
Tug484
 
PeterS wrote:
Add to that the Senate says they won't listen to the hearings. What is going on with you people? You wanted the impeachment inquiry out in the open and you are getting it? Why do your leaders want to hide from it now? Do they think that the v**ers won't understand what they are hiding from?

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/paulmcleod/republicans-secret-impeachment-hearings-tv-wont-watch

Since this is all crap, McConnell could shut it down.

Reply
Nov 9, 2019 06:52:22   #
Mad Dog
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
If it was a honest legitimate process, yes.


Then why has your party keep it behind closed doors

Reply
Nov 9, 2019 08:48:14   #
Big Kahuna
 
PeterS wrote:
Add to that the Senate says they won't listen to the hearings. What is going on with you people? You wanted the impeachment inquiry out in the open and you are getting it? Why do your leaders want to hide from it now? Do they think that the v**ers won't understand what they are hiding from?

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/paulmcleod/republicans-secret-impeachment-hearings-tv-wont-watch


I want Trump to televise the h*****gs of the treasonous demorats. Don't hide anything. The more open we are about this, the better and stronger we will be. It may have taken a "village" to raise these scoundrels but it will take just 1 good strong leader to show their criminality. Expose and show all these demonic dems for what they truly are!!

Reply
Nov 9, 2019 15:37:29   #
Tug484
 
drlarrygino wrote:
I want Trump to televise the h*****gs of the treasonous demorats. Don't hide anything. The more open we are about this, the better and stronger we will be. It may have taken a "village" to raise these scoundrels but it will take just 1 good strong leader to show their criminality. Expose and show all these demonic dems for what they truly are!!


You aren't the only one.
String them up on the Mall like a bunch of Christmas lights.
No better deterrent than seeing the consequences of someone's actions.

Reply
 
 
Nov 9, 2019 16:21:52   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
woodguru wrote:
But doesn't it make sense to want to hear what is being said?


Ever hear the saying you are judged by your company? Let's see, why wouldn't I want to be associated with a soviet style impeachment inquiry? Got it, because this is America!!! And the whole thing is a h**x which has allowed the UN or more specifically Mitt Romney, John Brennan and a guy from Burisma to start a UN compound in Utah. Dave Hodges did warn about that, but it hasn't gotten close enough for me to do anything about it. Are you ready for a body bag?

Reply
Nov 9, 2019 16:37:11   #
Tug484
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Ever hear the saying you are judged by your company? Let's see, why wouldn't I want to be associated with a soviet style impeachment inquiry? Got it, because this is America!!! And the whole thing is a h**x which has allowed the UN or more specifically Mitt Romney, John Brennan and a guy from Burisma to start a UN compound in Utah. Dave Hodges did warn about that, but it hasn't gotten close enough for me to do anything about it. Are you ready for a body bag?

Mitt Romney is involved in some Ukraine scandal too, but I didn't know about the UN compound.
I can't believe Utah even v**ed for him.

Reply
Nov 9, 2019 17:10:40   #
Big Kahuna
 
Tug484 wrote:
You aren't the only one.
String them up on the Mall like a bunch of Christmas lights.
No better deterrent than seeing the consequences of someone's actions.


Totally agree Tug484.

Reply
Nov 9, 2019 17:31:33   #
Tug484
 
drlarrygino wrote:
Totally agree Tug484.



Reply
 
 
Nov 10, 2019 16:52:19   #
zombinis3 Loc: Southwest
 
Mad Dog wrote:
Then why has your party keep it behind closed doors


For the same reason that the Republicans had closed hearing on B******i.
There was possible sensitive infomation being discussed, two
according to the house rules that were approved by the Republicans when they changed the subpoena requirements in 2015. This below came from page 18 of the House Rules document when Republicans v**ed a change to subpoena requirements. Pease note what is in parentheses. All meetings other than committee on Ethics are to be in the open. Since the impeachment is based on presumed ethical practices the meetings can be held in private. Then the other option for closed meeting is when the infomation that comes out may endanger national security, would compromise sensitive law enforcement information, would tend to defame, degrade, or incriminate any person, or otherwise would violate a law or rule of the House.

Open meetings and hearings
(g)(1) Each meeting for the t***saction of business, including the mark-
up of legislation, by a standing committee or subcommittee thereof (other
than the Committee on Ethics or its subcommittees) shall be open to the
public, including to radio, television, and still photography coverage, except
when the committee or subcommittee, in open session and with a majority
present, determines by record v**e that all or part of the remainder of the
meeting on that day shall be in executive session because disclosure of mat-
ters to be considered would endanger national security, would compromise
sensitive law enforcement information, would tend to defame, degrade, or in-
criminate any person, or otherwise would violate a law or rule of the
House. Persons, other than members of the committee and such noncommittee Members, Delegates, Resident Commis-
sioner, congressional staff, or departmental representatives as the com-
mittee may authorize, may not be present at a business or markup ses-
sion that is held in executive session. This subparagraph does not apply to
open committee hearings, which are governed by clause 4(a)(1) of rule X or
by subparagraph (2). (2)(A) Each hearing conducted by a committee or subcommittee (other than the Committee on Ethics or its
subcommittees) shall be open to the public, including to radio, television,
and still photography coverage, except when the committee or subcommittee, in open session and with a majority present, determines by record v**e that all or part of the remainder of that hearing on that day shall be closed to the public because disclosure sensitive law enforcement information, or would violate a clause
clause 2(k)(5); or
(ii) agree to close the hearing as
provided in clause 2(k)(5).
(C)

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.