One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Ignorance Should Be One Of The Seven Deadly Sins
Page <prev 2 of 2
Nov 8, 2019 23:53:31   #
EmilyD
 
woodguru wrote:
Sloth is the hardest one to define, but ignorance has elements of sloth involved.

Ignorant people are too lazy to use their brain to think about an issue they have already made their minds up about. More than that it takes too much energy to challenge already formed beliefs, it is laziness and complacency that keeps an ignorant person from taking the time or effort to explore an issue. It is something else to be content with an opinion formed on faulty premises and rhetoric.

When a well informed person is arguing with another person who is completely ignorant about the topic at hand, and the ignorant one says that this is lies, how does the ignorant person know they are lies if they don't know anything about it? Listening to Hannity talking about his opinion is not the same thing as reading or hearing something directly so as to form a better informed opinion.

If you are discussing something like the Mueller report with someone who has either read it, or read sections that cover the things he is talking about, and your only information comes from Hannity's take on a four page report that has been called purely wrong by everyone but the right...you have no business arguing with someone who has read it, let alone calling them or the report lies. Is it that damn hard to read things for yourself? The actual issue is that it would force you to think about and reassess your beliefs, because you don't have opinions, you have formed beliefs.

The bible should have called the laziness and sloth of ignorance a sin, but you know why it wasn't? The church needs people to believe what they are told without questioning it. Blind faith works better with unquestioned beliefs. And that's fine, wh**ever works for you, but don't bring unadulterated ignorance to a political debate, because next thing we know we will be in a civil war with ignorant frigging people.
Sloth is the hardest one to define, but ignorance ... (show quote)


WTH is "Sloth of Ignorance"? Your personal definition of "sin"?

And "blind faith" you throw around as if you know what you're talking about.

Blind faith is what Christians all over the world have. They believe in Jesus Christ, and they believe in the words that Jesus actually said as are written, highlighted in red, in any Christian bible you will look at.

When you use phrases like "sloth of ignorance", it leads me to believe that you are a believer in satanic occult. Which does not surprise me.

Read the Bible, and when you do - pay attention to the words written in red. (New Testament....after Christ appeared) very inspiring, friend.

Reply
Nov 9, 2019 01:32:59   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
EmilyD wrote:
WTH is "Sloth of Ignorance"? Your personal definition of "sin"?

And "blind faith" you throw around as if you know what you're talking about.

Blind faith is what Christians all over the world have. They believe in Jesus Christ, and they believe in the words that Jesus actually said as are written, highlighted in red, in any Christian bible you will look at.

When you use phrases like "sloth of ignorance", it leads me to believe that you are a believer in satanic occult. Which does not surprise me.

Read the Bible, and when you do - pay attention to the words written in red. (New Testament....after Christ appeared) very inspiring, friend.
WTH is "Sloth of Ignorance"? Your person... (show quote)

EmilyD Faith no longer need to be blind I have all the visible information.

Reply
Nov 9, 2019 06:04:07   #
Tug484
 
woodguru wrote:
Sloth is the hardest one to define, but ignorance has elements of sloth involved.

Ignorant people are too lazy to use their brain to think about an issue they have already made their minds up about. More than that it takes too much energy to challenge already formed beliefs, it is laziness and complacency that keeps an ignorant person from taking the time or effort to explore an issue. It is something else to be content with an opinion formed on faulty premises and rhetoric.

When a well informed person is arguing with another person who is completely ignorant about the topic at hand, and the ignorant one says that this is lies, how does the ignorant person know they are lies if they don't know anything about it? Listening to Hannity talking about his opinion is not the same thing as reading or hearing something directly so as to form a better informed opinion.

If you are discussing something like the Mueller report with someone who has either read it, or read sections that cover the things he is talking about, and your only information comes from Hannity's take on a four page report that has been called purely wrong by everyone but the right...you have no business arguing with someone who has read it, let alone calling them or the report lies. Is it that damn hard to read things for yourself? The actual issue is that it would force you to think about and reassess your beliefs, because you don't have opinions, you have formed beliefs.

The bible should have called the laziness and sloth of ignorance a sin, but you know why it wasn't? The church needs people to believe what they are told without questioning it. Blind faith works better with unquestioned beliefs. And that's fine, wh**ever works for you, but don't bring unadulterated ignorance to a political debate, because next thing we know we will be in a civil war with ignorant frigging people.
Sloth is the hardest one to define, but ignorance ... (show quote)


It is one of the seven deadly sins.

Reply
 
 
Nov 9, 2019 08:08:15   #
TrueAmerican
 
woodguru wrote:
Sloth is the hardest one to define, but ignorance has elements of sloth involved.

Ignorant people are too lazy to use their brain to think about an issue they have already made their minds up about. More than that it takes too much energy to challenge already formed beliefs, it is laziness and complacency that keeps an ignorant person from taking the time or effort to explore an issue. It is something else to be content with an opinion formed on faulty premises and rhetoric.

When a well informed person is arguing with another person who is completely ignorant about the topic at hand, and the ignorant one says that this is lies, how does the ignorant person know they are lies if they don't know anything about it? Listening to Hannity talking about his opinion is not the same thing as reading or hearing something directly so as to form a better informed opinion.

If you are discussing something like the Mueller report with someone who has either read it, or read sections that cover the things he is talking about, and your only information comes from Hannity's take on a four page report that has been called purely wrong by everyone but the right...you have no business arguing with someone who has read it, let alone calling them or the report lies. Is it that damn hard to read things for yourself? The actual issue is that it would force you to think about and reassess your beliefs, because you don't have opinions, you have formed beliefs.

The bible should have called the laziness and sloth of ignorance a sin, but you know why it wasn't? The church needs people to believe what they are told without questioning it. Blind faith works better with unquestioned beliefs. And that's fine, wh**ever works for you, but don't bring unadulterated ignorance to a political debate, because next thing we know we will be in a civil war with ignorant frigging people.
Sloth is the hardest one to define, but ignorance ... (show quote)


You would surely be guilty of this sin --- you are the epitome of ignorance !!!!!!

Reply
Nov 9, 2019 16:47:21   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
woodguru wrote:
Fortunately ignorant people who are a minority when they get butt hurt about Trump being impeached or losing the e******n and decide to revolt. A minority is a minority any way you look at it, and a revolt has that minority on the wrong side of the law.


A minority, a tiny minority is all that's necessary. 30 people. If you were better equipped to research this you could go on Youtube. AI has made advancements, there is now what I call a one robot k**l team. A few of those and no matter how small your army, you become close to invincible.

Reply
Nov 9, 2019 16:59:41   #
Tug484
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
A minority, a tiny minority is all that's necessary. 30 people. If you were better equipped to research this you could go on Youtube. AI has made advancements, there is now what I call a one robot k**l team. A few of those and no matter how small your army, you become close to invincible.


They're probably meant to k**l us citizens.
You know they want 90% of us exterminated.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.