Who will be the first one indicted for NOT murdering a child?? Federal Judge Strikes Down Law Allowing Clinicians to Object to A******ns Moral reasons are no longer acceptable. The...

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Federal Judge Strikes Down Law Allowing Clinicians to Object to A******ns
Moral reasons are no longer acceptable. The story from NBC News manages to quote only those who agreed with the ruling. The judge was appointed by Obama.

Kevyn

nwtk2007 wrote:

Federal Judge Strikes Down Law Allowing Clinicians to Object to A******ns
Moral reasons are no longer acceptable. The story from NBC News manages to quote only those who agreed with the ruling. The judge was appointed by Obama.

First of all it is an unconstitutional policy not a law. Secondly no one is forced to provide a******ns. The policy was struck down because it had a crippling effect on health care providers. As it stood if a Muslim telephone operator tasked with taking patients food orders in a hospital refused to take orders for non halal food and we’re told by their boss they had to they could claim their religious beliefs were under attack and the hospital could lose all federal funding.

F.D.R.

My personal view is that if a woman wants to have an a******n that's her choice, I'm certainly in no position to make a moral judgement. However, I can't see that this ruling has any weight. All any doctor has to say is that the practice doesn't do a******ns and refer them to someone who 'specializes' in a******ns.

Lonewolf

nwtk2007 wrote:

Federal Judge Strikes Down Law Allowing Clinicians to Object to A******ns
Moral reasons are no longer acceptable. The story from NBC News manages to quote only those who agreed with the ruling. The judge was appointed by Obama.

All they have to do is say I'm not qualified to perform those services and refer them to someone who does!

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

F.D.R. wrote:

My personal view is that if a woman wants to have an a******n that's her choice, I'm certainly in no position to make a moral judgement. However, I can't see that this ruling has any weight. All any doctor has to say is that the practice doesn't do a******ns and refer them to someone who 'specializes' in a******ns.

So, why was there ever a need for a law allowing clinicians to refrain from giving a******ns based upon moral beliefs in the first place if they weren't going to try to force clinicians into performing a******ns in the second place???

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Lonewolf wrote:

All they have to do is say I'm not qualified to perform those services and refer them to someone who does!

So, they would have to lie in order to maintain their integrity as pertains to their beliefs?? That is contradictory, isn't it??

Kevyn

nwtk2007 wrote:

So, they would have to lie in order to maintain their integrity as pertains to their beliefs?? That is contradictory, isn't it??

This elimination of this policy has nothing in it forcing anyone to provide a******ns. What it did that was corrected by the court was allow anyone in the field to refuse to in any way contribute to something that offended their religious beliefs. As an example a clerk in a hospital pharmacy could refuse to process a prescription for birth control pills.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Kevyn wrote:

This elimination of this policy has nothing in it forcing anyone to provide a******ns. What it did that was corrected by the court was allow anyone in the field to refuse to in any way contribute to something that offended their religious beliefs. As an example a clerk in a hospital pharmacy could refuse to process a prescription for birth control pills.

Filling a prescrition for birth control pills is a bit different than k*****g an unborn baby. Just say'in. But I see your point.

Big Kahuna

nwtk2007 wrote:

Federal Judge Strikes Down Law Allowing Clinicians to Object to A******ns
Moral reasons are no longer acceptable. The story from NBC News manages to quote only those who agreed with the ruling. The judge was appointed by Obama.

Soon a federal judge will allow a******n up to 9 months and infanticide and murder past 9 months. Oh, wait, this has already happened in New York with the blessing of governor Cuomo. In fact the demonic dems cheered the murder of infants and the color of the rainbow was lit up on the tallest building in NYC. While God and the Jewish people outlawed child sacrifice 6,000 years ago, the dems have implemented the child sacrifice again. The dems are indeed regressive and immoral.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

Kevyn wrote:

First of all it is an unconstitutional policy not a law. Secondly no one is forced to provide a******ns. The policy was struck down because it had a crippling effect on health care providers. As it stood if a Muslim telephone operator tasked with taking patients food orders in a hospital refused to take orders for non halal food and we’re told by their boss they had to they could claim their religious beliefs were under attack and the hospital could lose all federal funding.

Ever see War Of The Roses? That's Halal.

woodguru

nwtk2007 wrote:

Federal Judge Strikes Down Law Allowing Clinicians to Object to A******ns
Moral reasons are no longer acceptable. The story from NBC News manages to quote only those who agreed with the ruling. The judge was appointed by Obama.

If you are a clinician and you have a problem with your job you need to go find a new one.

woodguru

nwtk2007 wrote:

So, they would have to lie in order to maintain their integrity as pertains to their beliefs?? That is contradictory, isn't it??

No if you have beliefs that interfere with your job go get another on, this is a free country, not one where you get to practice your religion to the detriment of others.

woodguru

nwtk2007 wrote:

So, why was there ever a need for a law allowing clinicians to refrain from giving a******ns based upon moral beliefs in the first place if they weren't going to try to force clinicians into performing a******ns in the second place???

It is impossible to force a clinician to perform an a******n when they have the freedom to quit and go get another job.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

woodguru wrote:

If you are a clinician and you have a problem with your job you need to go find a new one.

May be so, if our country got just so stupid.