Popular v**e? Not that popular.
I am 100% for the E*******l College. Full blown Democracy is basically mob rule. However; we hear a lot from the left about all v**es should be counted? Hillary won because she won the popular v**e, every v**e is important and blah,blah, blah. Almost 40% of eligible v**ers didn’t bother to v**e in the 2016 e******n. Doesn’t seem like the v**e is all that popular. Here’s another interesting stat. If you threw out California Trump wins the popular v**e by over 1 million. This is also another worthless stat. My point. Stick with the E*******l College. A brilliant idea for a country of States.
JFlorio wrote:
I am 100% for the E*******l College. Full blown Democracy is basically mob rule. However; we hear a lot from the left about all v**es should be counted? Hillary won because she won the popular v**e, every v**e is important and blah,blah, blah. Almost 40% of eligible v**ers didn’t bother to v**e in the 2016 e******n. Doesn’t seem like the v**e is all that popular. Here’s another interesting stat. If you threw out California Trump wins the popular v**e by over 1 million. This is also another worthless stat. My point. Stick with the E*******l College. A brilliant idea for a country of States.
I am 100% for the E*******l College. Full blown De... (
show quote)
Well said!
America's founders were exponentially smarter than today's American-in-name-only Democrats.
Seth wrote:
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (
show quote)
Thanks. Much smarter but the bars pretty low if it’s a Democrat bar.
Don't forget, California allows dead people and i*****l a***ns to v**e. I suspect if all the c***ting across the nation were eliminated, Trump also won the popular v**e by a landslide.
Iliamna1 wrote:
Don't forget, California allows dead people and i*****l a***ns to v**e. I suspect if all the c***ting across the nation were eliminated, Trump also won the popular v**e by a landslide.
LOL! For some reason I envision Pocahontas Warren delivering a campaign speech at a cemetery, pandering for the Dearly Departed v**e.
Now that's funny! amid a huge funeral for some illegal drug kingpin who was shot by the drug cartel.
Without the E*******l College, small states like Vermont will be totally swamped by NY and California. However, the E*******l College is not being used as the Constitution says. I watched on TV, our three e*****rs v**e. Now they are supposed to v**e for two people, one of whom does not come from their state. Then when all the v**es come to DC, they get counted. There is no provision for Primary v**es or any input from the people at all. But rather than doing that, Governor Shumlin and two others merely cast three v**es for Hillary and ignored Bernie. So they violated the Constitution right there. The President should not need input from the people, as he supposed to be an executive. He carries out and enforces laws passed by Congress. But we don't have that anymore. We elect kings for four year terms. Taking money that Congress v**ed to be used for some project and using it to build a wall, is misappropriation of funds. If I had done that when I was chairman of the Bolton Select Board, I'd have been thrown in jail. But I guess it's OK if you are a king.
greenmountaineer wrote:
Without the E*******l College, small states like Vermont will be totally swamped by NY and California. However, the E*******l College is not being used as the Constitution says. I watched on TV, our three e*****rs v**e. Now they are supposed to v**e for two people, one of whom does not come from their state. Then when all the v**es come to DC, they get counted. There is no provision for Primary v**es or any input from the people at all. But rather than doing that, Governor Shumlin and two others merely cast three v**es for Hillary and ignored Bernie. So they violated the Constitution right there. The President should not need input from the people, as he supposed to be an executive. He carries out and enforces laws passed by Congress. But we don't have that anymore. We elect kings for four year terms. Taking money that Congress v**ed to be used for some project and using it to build a wall, is misappropriation of funds. If I had done that when I was chairman of the Bolton Select Board, I'd have been thrown in jail. But I guess it's OK if you are a king.
Without the E*******l College, small states like ... (
show quote)
Not misappropriation of funds at all. There is a case to be made that the southern border is a National Security issue. I believe this was ruled upon by the courts.
JFlorio wrote:
I am 100% for the E*******l College. Full blown Democracy is basically mob rule. However; we hear a lot from the left about all v**es should be counted? Hillary won because she won the popular v**e, every v**e is important and blah,blah, blah. Almost 40% of eligible v**ers didn’t bother to v**e in the 2016 e******n. Doesn’t seem like the v**e is all that popular. Here’s another interesting stat. If you threw out California Trump wins the popular v**e by over 1 million. This is also another worthless stat. My point. Stick with the E*******l College. A brilliant idea for a country of States.
I am 100% for the E*******l College. Full blown De... (
show quote)
Not only am I in favor of the P**********l E*******l College... I'm against State Legislatures mandating that their State's Plurality Winner receives 100% of their E*******l V**es...
I believe the concept of the E*******l College was the compromise between the more populated States - who wanted a "Total Plurality Winner of All The States" - and the less populated States - who wanted a "One State One V**e Plurality" - and the compromise was to have the President and Vice-President elected based on the States' Congressional Representation... This has the President and Vice-President elected by the Citizens within each House District, and the 2 Senators to represent the V**ers' Statewide choice...
Read Our Constitution Article 2 Section 1:
House District E*****rates were designed to represent how their House Districts' v**ers chose, and Senate E*****rates to represent how their Statewide v**ers chose... Not "Winner Take All"...
However...
The States' Legislatures in 48 of Our 50 States have decided to make it a "Statewide Plurality Take All" for their State's E*******l V**es, which is Legal, but completely against what Our Constitution is looking for...
JFlorio wrote:
I am 100% for the E*******l College. Full blown Democracy is basically mob rule. However; we hear a lot from the left about all v**es should be counted? Hillary won because she won the popular v**e, every v**e is important and blah,blah, blah. Almost 40% of eligible v**ers didn’t bother to v**e in the 2016 e******n. Doesn’t seem like the v**e is all that popular. Here’s another interesting stat. If you threw out California Trump wins the popular v**e by over 1 million. This is also another worthless stat. My point. Stick with the E*******l College. A brilliant idea for a country of States.
I am 100% for the E*******l College. Full blown De... (
show quote)
Actually, with all the fraud, 'dead v**es', and i******s she lost even he popular v**e.
greenmountaineer wrote:
Without the E*******l College, small states like Vermont will be totally swamped by NY and California. However, the E*******l College is not being used as the Constitution says. I watched on TV, our three e*****rs v**e. Now they are supposed to v**e for two people, one of whom does not come from their state. Then when all the v**es come to DC, they get counted. There is no provision for Primary v**es or any input from the people at all. But rather than doing that, Governor Shumlin and two others merely cast three v**es for Hillary and ignored Bernie. So they violated the Constitution right there. The President should not need input from the people, as he supposed to be an executive. He carries out and enforces laws passed by Congress. But we don't have that anymore. We elect kings for four year terms. Taking money that Congress v**ed to be used for some project and using it to build a wall, is misappropriation of funds. If I had done that when I was chairman of the Bolton Select Board, I'd have been thrown in jail. But I guess it's OK if you are a king.
Without the E*******l College, small states like ... (
show quote)
I would rather have my taxes build a wall than to have i******s flooding this country and living on our wellfare and food stamps with free housing and medical thrown in THANK YOU
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.