One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Taxes, taxes, taxes, and stupid regulation.
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Oct 18, 2019 08:35:44   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
Change in the 8 largest metro areas
Rank Metropolitan statistical area 2018 population Change from 2017

1 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA 19,979,477 -19,474
2 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 13,291,486 -7,223
3 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 9,498,716 -22,068
4 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 7,539,711 +131,767
5 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 6,997,384 +91,689
7 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL 6,198,782 +49,095
8 Orlando-Tampa, FL 6,096,372 +17,921


PS I had the columns lined up but when I hit update they come out all out of alinement, sorry


As you can see, the 3 cities run by the Liberal fools of America are losing people to the Conservative-run cities. They are moving to places that don't confiscate their money.
Why? Taxes, taxes, taxes, and stupid regulation.

Reply
Oct 18, 2019 08:46:29   #
Carol Kelly
 
MR Mister wrote:
Change in the 8 largest metro areas
Rank Metropolitan statistical area 2018 population Change from 2017

1 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA 19,979,477 -19,474
2 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 13,291,486 -7,223
3 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 9,498,716 -22,068
4 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 7,539,711 +131,767
5 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 6,997,384 +91,689
7 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL 6,198,782 +49,095
8 Orlando-Tampa, FL 6,096,372 +17,921


PS I had the columns lined up but when I hit update they come out all out of alinement, sorry


As you can see, the 3 cities run by the Liberal fools of America are losing people to the Conservative-run cities. They are moving to places that don't confiscate their money.
Why? Taxes, taxes, taxes, and stupid regulation.
Change in the 8 largest metro areas br Rank Metro... (show quote)


Lined up or not, this was very informative. Hope all the South’s gains are conservative. Keep us updated.

Reply
Oct 18, 2019 08:47:17   #
Seth
 
MR Mister wrote:
Change in the 8 largest metro areas
Rank Metropolitan statistical area 2018 population Change from 2017

1 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA 19,979,477 -19,474
2 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 13,291,486 -7,223
3 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 9,498,716 -22,068
4 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 7,539,711 +131,767
5 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 6,997,384 +91,689
7 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL 6,198,782 +49,095
8 Orlando-Tampa, FL 6,096,372 +17,921



As you can see, the 3 cities run by the Liberal fools of America are losing people to the Conservative-run cities. They are moving to places that don't confiscate their money.
Why? Taxes, taxes, taxes, and stupid regulation.
Change in the 8 largest metro areas br Rank Metro... (show quote)


And just think: if today's Democrats and their leftie line-up of p**********l candidates have their way, they'll "fundamentally t***sform" all of America into the spitting image of those cities, so there will be no escape without leaving the country and, in the case of businesses, taking their jobs with them.

I sincerely hope that none of those people herein that defend these Democratic Party aspirations actually expect any sane human being to respect their intelligence.

Reply
 
 
Oct 18, 2019 09:37:36   #
Radiance3
 
MR Mister wrote:
Change in the 8 largest metro areas
Rank Metropolitan statistical area 2018 population Change from 2017

1 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA 19,979,477 -19,474
2 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 13,291,486 -7,223
3 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 9,498,716 -22,068
4 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 7,539,711 +131,767
5 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 6,997,384 +91,689
7 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL 6,198,782 +49,095
8 Orlando-Tampa, FL 6,096,372 +17,921


PS I had the columns lined up but when I hit update they come out all out of alinement, sorry


As you can see, the 3 cities run by the Liberal fools of America are losing people to the Conservative-run cities. They are moving to places that don't confiscate their money.
Why? Taxes, taxes, taxes, and stupid regulation.
Change in the 8 largest metro areas br Rank Metro... (show quote)

================
The Socialist democrats are drooling to raising our taxes.
Do you know at present how much tax we pay now? Every time we move money from one hand to another, we pay taxes. In addition, our taxes that go to the IRS, the City, the County, the State, all our utilities and telephone bills, gas in our cars, have high taxes. Sum all those amount and it is about 70% of our income.

Reply
Oct 18, 2019 09:57:25   #
debeda
 
MR Mister wrote:
Change in the 8 largest metro areas
Rank Metropolitan statistical area 2018 population Change from 2017

1 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA 19,979,477 -19,474
2 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 13,291,486 -7,223
3 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 9,498,716 -22,068
4 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 7,539,711 +131,767
5 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 6,997,384 +91,689
7 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL 6,198,782 +49,095
8 Orlando-Tampa, FL 6,096,372 +17,921


PS I had the columns lined up but when I hit update they come out all out of alinement, sorry


As you can see, the 3 cities run by the Liberal fools of America are losing people to the Conservative-run cities. They are moving to places that don't confiscate their money.
Why? Taxes, taxes, taxes, and stupid regulation.
Change in the 8 largest metro areas br Rank Metro... (show quote)



Reply
Oct 18, 2019 09:58:17   #
debeda
 
Seth wrote:
And just think: if today's Democrats and their leftie line-up of p**********l candidates have their way, they'll "fundamentally t***sform" all of America into the spitting image of those cities, so there will be no escape without leaving the country and, in the case of businesses, taking their jobs with them.

I sincerely hope that none of those people herein that defend these Democratic Party aspirations actually expect any sane human being to respect their intelligence.
And just think: if today's Democrats and their lef... (show quote)


Very true. And really think about it. The way the world is, where do you go?

Reply
Oct 18, 2019 11:18:33   #
Lonewolf
 
Radiance3 wrote:
================
The Socialist democrats are drooling to raising our taxes.
Do you know at present how much tax we pay now? Every time we move money from one hand to another, we pay taxes. In addition, our taxes that go to the IRS, the City, the County, the State, all our utilities and telephone bills, gas in our cars, have high taxes. Sum all those amount and it is about 70% of our income.


Unlike Trump who borrows trillions just give to the top 1% that your money your grandkids money and it's all moving to the top

Reply
 
 
Oct 18, 2019 11:30:02   #
Radiance3
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Unlike Trump who borrows trillions just give to the top 1% that your money your grandkids money and it's all moving to the top

================
LOL, barrows trillions? He pays billions of taxes to the Federal Government, cities, counties, and state where he lives, or where his businesses are located. He does not owe anything. He gives his salary to the US Treasury and the charities.

Reply
Oct 18, 2019 11:35:10   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Unlike Trump who borrows trillions just give to the top 1% that your money your grandkids money and it's all moving to the top


Due to your lack of intellect, you are unaware of Obamas 10,000,000,000,000 spending program.
You should keep your mouth shut, as you keep making a fool of your self.

Reply
Oct 18, 2019 12:08:09   #
Seth
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Unlike Trump who borrows trillions just give to the top 1% that your money your grandkids money and it's all moving to the top


Where's your evidence that the tax cuts were only "for the rich?"

You lefties and your Democrat and MSM folks have been incessantly yelling that the tax cuts were "for the rich," just as tax & spend Democrats always claim when the Republicans cut taxes.

It's become quite tiresome, since all we hear is "for the rich!" without any solid or even viable examples.

Meanwhile, the middle class, the very backbone of our country, are doing better thanks to the Trump Tax Cuts®.

Reply
Oct 18, 2019 12:35:15   #
debeda
 
Seth wrote:
Where's your evidence that the tax cuts were only "for the rich?"

You lefties and your Democrat and MSM folks have been incessantly yelling that the tax cuts were "for the rich," just as tax & spend Democrats always claim when the Republicans cut taxes.

It's become quite tiresome, since all we hear is "for the rich!" without any solid or even viable examples.

Meanwhile, the middle class, the very backbone of our country, are doing better thanks to the Trump Tax Cuts®.
Where's your evidence that the tax cuts were only ... (show quote)



Reply
 
 
Oct 18, 2019 12:38:25   #
CarryOn
 
[quote=Seth]Where's your evidence that the tax cuts were only "for the rich?"

You lefties and your Democrat and MSM folks have been incessantly yelling that the tax cuts were "for the rich," just as tax & spend Democrats always claim when the Republicans cut taxes.

It's become quite tiresome, since all we hear is "for the rich!" without any solid or even viable examples.

Meanwhile, the middle class, the very backbone of our country, are doing better thanks to the Trump Tax Cuts®.[/quote

So true, Seth. It is tiresome. My CPA told me last April that they were seeing 8 out of 10 people saving several thousand dollars on taxes because of the tax cuts. He said for 1 out of 10 it didn't make much difference and for 1 out of 10 it was worse. I am one of the fortunate ones included in the first group and, trust me, I am a senior citizen with very modest income--not one of the 1% elites. I also am enjoying a substantial savings on estimated taxes for next year, again, because of the Trump tax cuts.

He also said that you will never hear any of this in the news reports because that is not what the left/media want people to hear. Their voices drown out the t***h because they don't want the t***h out there.

Reply
Oct 18, 2019 13:02:40   #
Seth
 
[quote=CarryOn][quote=Seth]Where's your evidence that the tax cuts were only "for the rich?"

You lefties and your Democrat and MSM folks have been incessantly yelling that the tax cuts were "for the rich," just as tax & spend Democrats always claim when the Republicans cut taxes.

It's become quite tiresome, since all we hear is "for the rich!" without any solid or even viable examples.

Meanwhile, the middle class, the very backbone of our country, are doing better thanks to the Trump Tax Cuts®.[/quote

So true, Seth. It is tiresome. My CPA told me last April that they were seeing 8 out of 10 people saving several thousand dollars on taxes because of the tax cuts. He said for 1 out of 10 it didn't make much difference and for 1 out of 10 it was worse. I am one of the fortunate ones included in the first group and, trust me, I am a senior citizen with very modest income--not one of the 1% elites. I also am enjoying a substantial savings on estimated taxes for next year, again, because of the Trump tax cuts.

He also said that you will never hear any of this in the news reports because that is not what the left/media want people to hear. Their voices drown out the t***h because they don't want the t***h out there.[/quote]

There's even hypocrisy there. They keep telling us the economy is "worse" under Trump, but when they see a political benefit, they claim that our booming economy is Obama's doing.

Reply
Oct 18, 2019 13:22:33   #
CarryOn
 
Seth wrote:
There's even hypocrisy there. They keep telling us the economy is "worse" under Trump, but when they see a political benefit, they claim that our booming economy is Obama's doing.


… so true. Of course they are, as usual, counting on the "stupidity of the American v**er" so they can have it both ways. But as soon as they start talking about--or obviously talking around (Warren)--having to raise taxes even on the middle class in order to pay for these socialist plans, that should be enough to make people take stock of how different their lives are now as opposed to the sad obama years when we were basically told to get used to a lower standard of living--and blame Bush for it.

Reply
Oct 18, 2019 16:14:36   #
Seth
 
CarryOn wrote:
… so true. Of course they are, as usual, counting on the "stupidity of the American v**er" so they can have it both ways. But as soon as they start talking about--or obviously talking around (Warren)--having to raise taxes even on the middle class in order to pay for these socialist plans, that should be enough to make people take stock of how different their lives are now as opposed to the sad obama years when we were basically told to get used to a lower standard of living--and blame Bush for it.
… so true. Of course they are, as usual, counting... (show quote)


Yup, like Obama's statement that Trump would need a "magic wand" to create a economic growth higher than his own pitiful "new normal."

Then when it happens, "I did that."

As my late grandfather would have said,
Obama needs "a good, swift kick in the touchas."

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.