Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Not following you Hug...
Clarification?
Some Senators would not be brave enough to v**e for impeachment if they knew their constituents would know how they v**ed.
Trump is not important enough to have a fist fight over.....a civil war is preposterous.
Geo wrote:
Would impeachment lead to civil war?
Ridiculous. It comes from a simple mind (Trump) to influence simple minds.
This shows what Trump thinks of the mental capacity of the American v**er.
THIS I can wholeheartedly agree with.
Pariahjf wrote:
THIS I can wholeheartedly agree with.
Americans have their own problems without having to deal with some i***tic civil war. Nobody cares that much about Trump.
Singularity wrote:
I'm taking a new Karate Yoga Defense Class. Think I'll be safe, enough.
Kee!!!! Yah!
Oh yeah, forgot to kick. Lets see, now, left foot in, left foot out.
There we go!
Namaste.
Feel safer already. To think I have always avoided violence. Huh!
your wit is violence enough
ain't sayin that's bad tho
merlin1246 wrote:
150,000,000 dead, MINIMUM.
Once it gets started, there will be no stopping it.
Community by community. Street by street.
House by house. Most dead will not be buried,
but will rot away where they fall. It didn't have
to be that way, but when one group of people
calls another, and better armed, group of people
"deplorable" it signals the end of non-violent
communication.
It would signal the end of non violent communication when violent action rather than words are exchanged.
Of course, avoiding violent responses when calling out another's or another group's faults in nonambiguous language and nondeferential tones requires a careful balance of tact, humility and the ability to duck.
Or a smartphone with unlimited internet connection.
drlarrygino wrote:
F**e news. I bought and old car and ran a test on what side was more destructive. I put a Hillary sticker on the old car 1st and parked it in a conservative neighborhood for 3 days. Not 1 scratch was found on it. Then, I put a Trump, MAGA bumper sticker on it and parked it for 3 days in a l*****t neiborhood. Low and behold, my old car was keyed up on both sides, the back end and a window was broken too. My Trump sign was spray painted over and a N**i emblem was spray painted on the front window. My conclusion; the left is most destructive, don't send your kids to any l*****t university and stay away from large cities to avoid destructive l*****ts. If you are a conservative, give your loved ones a Bible and pray for their healing from l*****t anti-Christian values.
F**e news. I bought and old car and ran a test on ... (
show quote)
Sounds like a good science fair project for many California and New York neighborhoods!
JFlorio wrote:
Well the Trump supporters would win but I won’t be there. No politician is worth spilling blood over. Mine or theirs.
Screw the politicians!
My v**e is worth fighting for. Our Republic is worth fighting for. Our Constitution is worth fighting for.
I repeat, plan A...Dems twist in the wind while threatening impeachment as more and more stuff is declassified. They are to know fear; they are to know pain; then they die.
Plan B...Dems impeach and all the above still happens, just quicker.
I'm for plan B.
Hug wrote:
Some Senators would not be brave enough to v**e for impeachment if they knew their constituents would know how they v**ed.
We are at the stage where we are deciding whether urgent and disturbing allegations of wrongdoing merit further investigation and subsequent consideration of corrective action up to and including impeachment.
Last I heard about 2/3 of the US citizens have concern enough about alleged possible wrongdoing or else a passionate desire to show the President's innocence to wish for this investigation to proceed. A number of folks continue to express premature confidence in a specific outcome. People do that. And about 1/3 don't wish for facts to cloud their decisionmaking in the first place.
If a conservative Senator might v**e to investigate, firmly believing
exoneration would be the worthy outcome, what message does opposing such imply but that obfuscation is a more
survivable strategy? And when, in the whole scheme of things, does opting for a survivable strategy move from pragmatism to cynicism?
Ferrous
Loc: Pacific North Coast, CA
proud republican wrote:
Even if you Rats will successfully Congress impeach in him, the Senate WILL NEVER convict him... So you Rats have nothing to worry about!!
Exactly... The Dims can impeach President Trump in the House. They have the Majority there and all their "Little Minions" will v**e as they are told. Those in Red Districts that T***p w*n will be willing to "Fall on their Sword" following directions from Nancy.
The Senate is a different story with "Loose Cannons " like Romney and the "Never Trumpers."
This Impeachment drive by the Dims will end up hurting them in the 2020 e******n, no matter what they do.
President Trump for four more years...
I re-post something OPP's own venerable BadBobby put on the forum some time ago. It seems apropro…
"Confined in one boundary, living together
showing different reactions to changing weather.
Stabbing each other, hoping to reach some destiny
creating a stumbling block as the way, what an irony.
Loving outsiders in possession of a different gene
To the point patriotism withers and becomes lean.
It's time for one side to enjoy the rain.
The other sits and curse the pain.
Hatred and marginalization become the trendy sk**l
compressing the mind, even to the point of k**l.
Nepotism and bigotry are fertilized to cause so much evil.
Interaction between distant compatriots, liable to be far from civil
One nation, one people, if this family can get her to not see.
Then for humanity's sake, let everyone simply be.
Separation entices building up the end.
Enemies of each other yet attempts a mend.
Seeing through the binoculars of what lies tomorrow
Love, patience and unity there's a need to borrow.
Diversity is a blessing, like departments of a college.
One can function as a nutrient, the other as roughage."
Singularity wrote:
We are at the stage where we are deciding whether urgent and disturbing allegations of wrongdoing merit further investigation and subsequent consideration of corrective action up to and including impeachment.
Last I heard about 2/3 of the US citizens have concern enough about alleged possible wrongdoing or else a passionate desire to show the President's innocence to wish for this investigation to proceed. A number of folks continue to express premature confidence in a specific outcome. People do that. And about 1/3 don't wish for facts to cloud their decisionmaking in the first place.
If a conservative Senator might v**e to investigate, firmly believing exoneration would be the worthy outcome, what message does opposing such imply but that obfuscation is a more survivable strategy?
And when, in the whole scheme of things, does opting for a survivable strategy move from pragmatism to cynicism?
We are at the stage where we are deciding whether ... (
show quote)
Your "theory" should be tested in a House v**e to impeach.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.