Schiff must revise himself (Page 2): Sorry comrade lil guy. It has come directly from one of your favorite sites, Politico. They actually posted the entire conversation also. I read...

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Kevyn wrote:

This has been proven a lie, you need to stay current on the I***t Pumpkinfuhrer’s talking points.

Sorry comrade lil guy. It has come directly from one of your favorite sites, Politico. They actually posted the entire conversation also. I read it. Besides being boring there is no illegalities. No quid pro quo. No money mentioned at all. keep trying guys. What a colossal waste of time. That's what you do when your candidates policies will be turned down if they ever get to debate Trump.

PeterS

proud republican wrote:

img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)

How has the whistleblower story not panned out? Trump verified it with his own words.

Cuda2020

JFlorio wrote:

That is if the rule of law is to be followed. Fat chance of that with the Democrats running the intelligence committee. Here’s why. The so called whistleblower gave his complaint to a Schiff aide who gave it to Schiff. The complaint by rule is supposed to go directly to the I. G.. Schiff is head of the intelligence committee, basically the prosecutor. He is a Fact Witness. He should be recused from asking any questions. This entire show is a farce.

I don't see reading a report as being any form of witness.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Barracuda2020 wrote:

I don't see reading a report as being any form of witness.

It is actually the definition. Sorry you don't get it. The fact that the whistleblower complaint did not follow whistleblower protocol is very problematic in any potential inquiry.

Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI

bggamers wrote:

Does that in clude Obama as well because he has a long list

Obama is not in the white house any more.
You have hitched a ride & being taken where you will not want to be.

But take a good look at just how well the liberals clean up conservatives messes.

Trump isn't wearing a white hat or riding a white horse.
He is more in league with the devil than with God.

When you buy into Trumps agenda you end up with the fall out that is coming.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Floyd Brown wrote:

Obama is not in the white house any more.
You have hitched a ride & being taken where you will not want to be.

But take a good look at just how well the liberals clean up conservatives messes.

Trump isn't wearing a white hat or riding a white horse.
He is more in league with the devil than with God.

When you buy into Trumps agenda you end up with the fall out that is coming.

Actually I look at the micro mess's. Look just how well the large inner cities have been taken care of over the years. Exclusively under liberal control then get back to us. By the way, When's the last time unemployment was this low? We are also at the highest median income per family unit ever.

Cuda2020

JFlorio wrote:

It is actually the definition. Sorry you don't get it. The fact that the whistleblower complaint did not follow whistleblower protocol is very problematic in any potential inquiry.

Really, let's see that exact definition, I feel confident you've misinterpreted once again, I mean it is the right's MO.

The head of the CI is not there to try the case or judge, he's there to make sure the correct process is executed and rules are abided to.

Cuda2020

JFlorio wrote:

Actually I look at the micro mess's. Look just how well the large inner cities have been taken care of over the years. Exclusively under liberal control then get back to us. By the way, When's the last time unemployment was this low? We are also at the highest median income per family unit ever.

Probably because more people have to work in the family unit, Gramma and grandpa have to put off retirement, and college kids are forced to live with mom and dad.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Probably because more people have to work in the family unit, Gramma and grandpa have to put off retirement, and college kids are forced to live with mom and dad.

That's what you actually believe? If you are not a troll you have a great future as one. I have yet , on this site to see you ever agree with an opposing view. No matter how much proof or expertise they have. You are always the smartest in the room. for that to be possible you would have to be the only one in the room. You know more Law than I do, even though I have a paralegal certificate. You no more about S.S. than I do, even though I am a Nationally Certified Social Security Adviser. So there really is no point in discussing anything with you. go lecture a climate scientist on the climate. I'm sure you're an expert.

Cuda2020

JFlorio wrote:

That's what you actually believe? If you are not a... (show quote)

Well, I'll agree with the climate scientists, g****l w*****g deniers, no. Should I apologize for knowing what I do, or for looking into it when I don't? What exactly are my offenses, that I believe what I do? My sincerest apologies...I guess.

tbutkovich

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Probably because more people have to work in the family unit, Gramma and grandpa have to put off retirement, and college kids are forced to live with mom and dad.

Barracuda,

Your so full of $chitt, that your eyes are turning brown. In the first three years of Trump, median income has gone up $6000 as compared to $1000 for the eight years Obummer was in office! And with virtually zero inflation. That’s an excellent track record for the Donald Trump. What a great story!

emarine

JFlorio wrote:

That is if the rule of law is to be followed. Fat chance of that with the Democrats running the intelligence committee. Here’s why. The so called whistleblower gave his complaint to a Schiff aide who gave it to Schiff. The complaint by rule is supposed to go directly to the I. G.. Schiff is head of the intelligence committee, basically the prosecutor. He is a Fact Witness. He should be recused from asking any questions. This entire show is a farce.

Revise or recuse ?...

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

emarine wrote:

Revise or recuse ?...

Good point. I shall research. He shouldn’t lead the committee but doesn’t automatically have to recuse himself from the I. C.. which would be a revision.

bggamers Loc: georgia

JFlorio wrote:

That's what you actually believe? If you are not a... (show quote)

Don't bust a gut with explaining to someone that doesn't care I've wondered recently if these trolls are being paid to do this. Because they are not here to exchange ideas. Ones like wolf who can get on your last nerve does drop his attitude when he agrees with a comment and Kevyn once in a blue moon

Big Kahuna

proud republican wrote:

He is the most un-intelligent ugly MFer there is!!!

Shifty Schiff and no nads Nadler run neck and neck for ugliness.