The New York Times suddenly made a major revision to a supposed bombshell piece late Sunday concerning a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh — hours after virtually all 2020 Democratic p**********l candidates had cited the original article as a reason to impeach Kavanaugh.
bmac32 wrote:
The New York Times suddenly made a major revision to a supposed bombshell piece late Sunday concerning a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh — hours after virtually all 2020 Democratic p**********l candidates had cited the original article as a reason to impeach Kavanaugh.
The nytimes is a Rag I wouldn’t wipe my butt with.
bmac32 wrote:
The New York Times suddenly made a major revision to a supposed bombshell piece late Sunday concerning a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh — hours after virtually all 2020 Democratic p**********l candidates had cited the original article as a reason to impeach Kavanaugh.
Saw this. Can’t imagine a once major newspaper would print a story and leave out the fact that the alleged victim can’t recall the assault. Then people wanting to run the country throw the Constitution out the window and proclaim the accused guilty. These people are a danger to our way of life.
JFlorio wrote:
...and leave out the fact that the alleged victim can’t recall the assault.
HUH ??
'Yeah, Let's Run With This One !!'
NYT has become a rag for a newspaper.
JFlorio wrote:
Saw this. Can’t imagine a once major newspaper would print a story and leave out the fact that the alleged victim can’t recall the assault. Then people wanting to run the country throw the Constitution out the window and proclaim the accused guilty. These people are a danger to our way of life.
The New York Times tossed a mouldy “bombshell” bone out to the drooling-for-revived-scandals Democrats on Friday. Like ravenous wolves p**********l hopefuls Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, Beto O’Rourke, Cory Booker, and Julian Castro, among others seized upon the bone as if it were their last meal, which unbeknownst to them most likely was.
Their cry to “Impeach Kavanaugh!” was soon overshot by an 11th-hour ‘update’ from the New York Times, including that they missed the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim in their bombshell story said she did not recall the supposed sexual assault in question at all.
karpenter wrote:
HUH ??
'Yeah, Let's Run With This One !!'
I believe in the past this was called Yellow Journalism. Very derogatory.
bmac32 wrote:
The New York Times suddenly made a major revision to a supposed bombshell piece late Sunday concerning a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh — hours after virtually all 2020 Democratic p**********l candidates had cited the original article as a reason to impeach Kavanaugh.
Given that the senate refused to conduct any attempts to credibly use FBI information it remains to be addressed by a real senate confirmation by the rules. Kavanaugh lied in his confirmation hearing, how hard would it have been for the GOP to eliminate him and say pick another?
The senate confirmation process with republicans running it has been broken, any normal process where negatives are brought to light would result in the expected rejection, which would have eliminated every one of Trump's appointees that have been embroiled in scandal, it was predictable and the system is supposed to be used to qualify people and reject those who should be rejected.
This McConnell senate will confirm a stinking turd rather than simply tell the president to pick another, now many of Trump's positions are filled with temporary non confirmed acting heads.
bmac32 wrote:
The New York Times suddenly made a major revision to a supposed bombshell piece late Sunday concerning a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh — hours after virtually all 2020 Democratic p**********l candidates had cited the original article as a reason to impeach Kavanaugh.
NYT has never questioned the credibility of their lonely accuser.
Max Steir is a liberal activist who held several positions in the Clinton administration.
Max Steir clerked for Justice David Souter of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Max Steir's wife, Florence Yu Pan, was nominated by then Pres. Barack Obama to be a federal judge
for the Washington D.C. US District Court, but her nomination expired without a v**e.
Little "Maxi-pad" Steir has an ax to grind, a pack of lies, and a desperate audience; that's all.
Little "Maxi-pad" Steir deserves to be tarred and feathered
Who Lied During The Confirmation Hearing ??
Christine 'THOT' Blasey-Ford
And Probably Feinstein
woodguru wrote:
Given that the senate refused to conduct any attempts to credibly use FBI information it remains to be addressed by a real senate confirmation by the rules. Kavanaugh lied in his confirmation hearing, how hard would it have been for the GOP to eliminate him and say pick another?
The senate confirmation process with republicans running it has been broken, any normal process where negatives are brought to light would result in the expected rejection, which would have eliminated every one of Trump's appointees that have been embroiled in scandal, it was predictable and the system is supposed to be used to qualify people and reject those who should be rejected.
This McConnell senate will confirm a stinking turd rather than simply tell the president to pick another, now many of Trump's positions are filled with temporary non confirmed acting heads.
Given that the senate refused to conduct any attem... (
show quote)
You seem to be knee deep in the Dems BS that they spout every day and hour. Pray tell us how Kavanaugh lied in the hearing. Show undeniable evidence. I believe you will not be able to do that.
woodguru wrote:
Given that the senate refused to conduct any attempts to credibly use FBI information it remains to be addressed by a real senate confirmation by the rules. Kavanaugh lied in his confirmation hearing, how hard would it have been for the GOP to eliminate him and say pick another?
The senate confirmation process with republicans running it has been broken, any normal process where negatives are brought to light would result in the expected rejection, which would have eliminated every one of Trump's appointees that have been embroiled in scandal, it was predictable and the system is supposed to be used to qualify people and reject those who should be rejected.
This McConnell senate will confirm a stinking turd rather than simply tell the president to pick another, now many of Trump's positions are filled with temporary non confirmed acting heads.
Given that the senate refused to conduct any attem... (
show quote)
Stick with a topic,Wood...Its just like a Rat to excuse BS Newspaper NYT....All it is a political hit job by failing newspaper!!!.......FBI did all the investigation that needs to be done!!!..PERIOD!!!!1
JFlorio wrote:
Saw this. Can’t imagine a once major newspaper would print a story and leave out the fact that the alleged victim can’t recall the assault. Then people wanting to run the country throw the Constitution out the window and proclaim the accused guilty. These people are a danger to our way of life.
It was once a major newspaper but not in the recent memory of the young who still hang on every word. These people are a threat to our very life’s blood. Couldn’t agree with you more.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.