Why are there smoke-free zones? The answer seems just as obvious but there will always be people who don't understand it and view it as an intrusion on their rights...
Gun Free Zones only work for mass k**lers, they read it as "Free Fire Zone".
Can you show me where "Gun Free Zones" have ever saved a single life?.
Gatsby wrote:
Gun Free Zones only work for mass k**lers, they read it as "Free Fire Zone".
Can you show me where "Gun Free Zones" have ever saved a single life?.
Exactly. Mass shooters know where to go...'gun free zones'~
Please make a good example for us. Walk down a street late at night in a high crime rate zone a=wsithout a weapon and do it for a month.
So we're loonies? Who's stooping to calling names? Seems to me you liberals can give it but can't take it.
That's why Rush made it. He turned satire around on you.
Bush is a g*******t who has no care for United States citizens.
To figure either bush just see who their friends are. Both members of Skull and Bones The older one escaped justice through death. The younger destroyed our freedoms and liberties with the 'Patriot Act' the largest violations on our rights at the time. After 8 years of obama the Patriot Act look like a parking ticket. Bo Rock gave himself authority to murder Americans without trial or due process, Since he gave himself power to do Americans he must also have the power to do anyone in Africa. Barry used selected genocide due to his 50% Whiteness, a flaming r****t who uses the N word and might be a card carrying NRA member. A lawless law that singled out our children as helpless, defenseless, victims over 850 times with over 550 children murdered in the gun free zones.
What does the left have to say about the carnage in the Gun Free Zones? More Gun Free Zones and more gun laws. Makes perfect sense to the vegetables who's sense is no sense at all.
So, what is a "connie". Or is that just another cheap slur by someone going furhur and furthur into fiction and not facts. Sort of like calling those of us that believe in the Constitution as "nuts"
PeterS wrote:
Why are there smoke-free zones? The answer seems just as obvious but there will always be people who don't understand it and view it as an intrusion on their rights...
For those that seem to be simple minded and try to bring up old battles, because second hand smoke was and is a constant active assault on the lives and health of those who are put upon by those discourteous people of the past. They now smoke outside and have their own little fraternity of people with a addiction and an early miserable death wish without k*****g us in the process.
Gun free zones accomplish nothing more then to make cupcakes, perhaps like you, feel safe, when in fact they are less safe from some unknown fantasy of danger that isn't really there. At least until someone wants to invade your fantasy safe zone and k**l a bunch of unprotected fools who thought that were safe.
ImLogicallyRight wrote:
For those that seem to be simple minded and try to bring up old battles, because second hand smoke was and is a constant active assault on the lives and health of those who are put upon by those discourteous people of the past. They now smoke outside and have their own little fraternity of people with a addiction and an early miserable death wish without k*****g us in the process.
Gun free zones accomplish nothing more then to make cupcakes, perhaps like you, feel safe, when in fact they are less safe from some unknown fantasy of danger that isn't really there. At least until someone wants to invade your fantasy safe zone and k**l a bunch of unprotected fools who thought that were safe.
For those that seem to be simple minded and try to... (
show quote)
Let's say that lil Peter had armed criminals trying to break into his house.
Does anyone believe that he would hope that the police show up inadequately armed to help him?
Smoke-free zones make sense to me, no cancer risk. Gun-free zones are ludicrous. I went into one, a nursing home only it was no longer gun-free. I carried a derringer. Small, but if they were going to tell any wacko "Hey there are soft targets in here," I wasn't going to be one.
The answer is crystal clear: political pandering. The act does not prohibit individuals from possessing a gun in school, it merely states that such an individual must be "authorized" to do so, leaving states and school districts to write rules for such authorization. The act is a useless piece of paper, making criminals of "unauthorized" armed parents or school employees who carelessly or thoughtlessly enter a "school zone" (not just the school itself but some distance from it) while being completely powerless to prevent an armed individual from entering the school to k**l someone he has a problem with or to shoot as many people as possible before somebody armed does show up to stop him.
byronglimish wrote:
Let's say that lil Peter had armed criminals trying to break into his house.
Does anyone believe that he would hope that the police show up inadequately armed to help him?
You’re assuming he’d be able to call the police. Criminals are getting smarter. The best home defense is a layered system.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.