One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Is bigotry an impeachable offense?
Sep 5, 2019 23:22:08   #
debeda
 
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/09/05/if_trumps_bigotry_is_an_impeachable_offense_why_did_obama_get_a_pass_141175.html

Article

Reply
Sep 5, 2019 23:37:44   #
rumitoid
 
debeda wrote:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/09/05/if_trumps_bigotry_is_an_impeachable_offense_why_did_obama_get_a_pass_141175.html

Article


His refusal to put his holdings in a blind trust and profit from his presidency, hosting dignitaries at his properties and so on, not only violates the emolument clause in the Constitution but threatens national security. If he has a business deal with, let's say, Saudi Arabia, and if there is some conflict or dispute, as with Yemen, whom will he favor? Or the k*****g of that journalist? How did he respond? Think about it.

Reply
Sep 5, 2019 23:48:51   #
debeda
 
rumitoid wrote:
His refusal to put his holdings in a blind trust and profit from his presidency, hosting dignitaries at his properties and so on, not only violates the emolument clause in the Constitution but threatens national security. If he has a business deal with, let's say, Saudi Arabia, and if there is some conflict or dispute, as with Yemen, whom will he favor? Or the k*****g of that journalist? How did he respond? Think about it.


The subject is bigotry.

Reply
 
 
Sep 6, 2019 00:03:01   #
rumitoid
 
debeda wrote:
The subject is bigotry.


Yes. What Trump has for anyone that upsets or opposes him.

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 05:18:46   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
rumitoid wrote:
His refusal to put his holdings in a blind trust
Can You Show A Statute That Says That's Necessary, Esquire ??
Quote:
and profit from his presidency, hosting dignitaries at his properties and so on, not only violates the emolument clause in the Constitution but threatens national security.

He's Not Managing Those Assets
How Much Old News Do You Need To Be Shown ??

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 05:26:43   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
rumitoid wrote:
Yes. What Trump has for anyone that upsets or opposes him.

Bernie Voiced That Overtly
For People Of Color The World Over
https://www.dailywire.com/news/51439/bernie-pushes-population-control-poor-countries-james-barrett

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 08:38:59   #
debeda
 
rumitoid wrote:
His refusal to put his holdings in a blind trust and profit from his presidency, hosting dignitaries at his properties and so on, not only violates the emolument clause in the Constitution but threatens national security. If he has a business deal with, let's say, Saudi Arabia, and if there is some conflict or dispute, as with Yemen, whom will he favor? Or the k*****g of that journalist? How did he respond? Think about it.


Ya know, rumi, it gets tiresome having you waylay every thread of discussion with your one way thinking. You should title all your conversations *I h**e Trump. Do you h**e Trump? If not, you're a dope". This topic was about bigotry, NOT your hatred of President Trump's supposed "misdeeds".

Reply
 
 
Sep 6, 2019 10:25:27   #
bahmer
 
debeda wrote:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/09/05/if_trumps_bigotry_is_an_impeachable_offense_why_did_obama_get_a_pass_141175.html

Article


Amen and Amen

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 10:54:20   #
debeda
 
karpenter wrote:


They're all whacked!! And I love the way Bernie conflates a******n with birth control. LOVED Ted Cruz's burn to him

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 13:46:15   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
rumitoid wrote:
His refusal to put his holdings in a blind trust and profit from his presidency, hosting dignitaries at his properties and so on, not only violates the emolument clause in the Constitution but threatens national security. If he has a business deal with, let's say, Saudi Arabia, and if there is some conflict or dispute, as with Yemen, whom will he favor? Or the k*****g of that journalist? How did he respond? Think about it.


Please show how he threatens out national security with his holdings not being in a trust. He would eventually acquire that money no matter what. As for the thinking issue. The only issue I can see is your rabid thinking created by the progressives in this government.

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 14:17:10   #
woodguru
 
Louie27 wrote:
Please show how he threatens out national security with his holdings not being in a trust. He would eventually acquire that money no matter what. As for the thinking issue. The only issue I can see is your rabid thinking created by the progressives in this government.


It's what and how holdings are being used in foreign policy conflicts that are disturbing. A foreign country comes to conduct business that wants something from the US. Normally they would conduct business in DC, stay at the four seasons or any other highly rated hotel. Now of course it's a trump hotel because it would be an insult to trump to stay anywhere else. They bring a large envoy, trump event planners recommend ten or fifteen of the most expensive rooms and an even room at wh**ever rate they want to charge. $2500 bottles of wine can be suggested. Bills for hundreds of thousands can be easily fabricated and a foreign country considers it cheap for the favor. The Saudi prince booked a whole floor of a failing hotel for an extended period of months that they weren't even using.

Kushner pushed Qatar in a loan for an upside down hotel nobody would lend money on, they refused and Qatar pushed a second time, they still politely declined. Next thing you know the US was supporting a blockade sanction with the Saudi's that cost them billions a week, and what do you know, they loaned or invested in the hotel to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, that being nothing to the billions a week the blockade was costing them.

This is third world banana republic crap right here.

Reply
 
 
Sep 6, 2019 14:38:52   #
debeda
 
woodguru wrote:
It's what and how holdings are being used in foreign policy conflicts that are disturbing. A foreign country comes to conduct business that wants something from the US. Normally they would conduct business in DC, stay at the four seasons or any other highly rated hotel. Now of course it's a trump hotel because it would be an insult to trump to stay anywhere else. They bring a large envoy, trump event planners recommend ten or fifteen of the most expensive rooms and an even room at wh**ever rate they want to charge. $2500 bottles of wine can be suggested. Bills for hundreds of thousands can be easily fabricated and a foreign country considers it cheap for the favor. The Saudi prince booked a whole floor of a failing hotel for an extended period of months that they weren't even using.

Kushner pushed Qatar in a loan for an upside down hotel nobody would lend money on, they refused and Qatar pushed a second time, they still politely declined. Next thing you know the US was supporting a blockade sanction with the Saudi's that cost them billions a week, and what do you know, they loaned or invested in the hotel to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, that being nothing to the billions a week the blockade was costing them.

This is third world banana republic crap right here.
It's what and how holdings are being used in forei... (show quote)


Third world banana republic? Like LA? San Francisco? The state of California? Chicago? Baltimore? DC? All dem run places, FYI

Reply
Sep 7, 2019 13:34:14   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
woodguru wrote:
It's what and how holdings are being used in foreign policy conflicts that are disturbing. A foreign country comes to conduct business that wants something from the US. Normally they would conduct business in DC, stay at the four seasons or any other highly rated hotel. Now of course it's a trump hotel because it would be an insult to trump to stay anywhere else. They bring a large envoy, trump event planners recommend ten or fifteen of the most expensive rooms and an even room at wh**ever rate they want to charge. $2500 bottles of wine can be suggested. Bills for hundreds of thousands can be easily fabricated and a foreign country considers it cheap for the favor. The Saudi prince booked a whole floor of a failing hotel for an extended period of months that they weren't even using.

Kushner pushed Qatar in a loan for an upside down hotel nobody would lend money on, they refused and Qatar pushed a second time, they still politely declined. Next thing you know the US was supporting a blockade sanction with the Saudi's that cost them billions a week, and what do you know, they loaned or invested in the hotel to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, that being nothing to the billions a week the blockade was costing them.

This is third world banana republic crap right here.
It's what and how holdings are being used in forei... (show quote)


I see no evidence to support any of those statements. If thee is said proof please provide so I can become more versed on this subject. Without such proof those statements will be disregarded.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.