Russian writer calls out Obama as a C*******t: Why is it that the so-called reporters within the United States cannot see what people outside the United States can see? Come on people...

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Why is it that the so-called reporters within the United States cannot see what people outside the United States can see? Come on people wake up and inform those who do not know! Of course, the Russian talking there doesn't know how much control Obama has over the media here.

Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/04/russian-calls-out-barack-obama-as-a-c*******t/#ixzz2RRHKOscY

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/04/russian-calls-out-barack-obama-as-a-c*******t/

Ah yes, the Russians can see through I Won and his followers here can't as long as he comes up with the freebies he has promised them.

ABBAsFernando Loc: Ohio

Not only the Kenyan is a C*******t he is a MUSLIM SPY!

memBrain Loc: North Carolina (No longer in hiding.)

Oh, they can see it. Their editors won't let the principled ones (if there are any left) write about it.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

memBrain wrote:

Oh, they can see it. Their editors won't let the principled ones (if there are any left) write about it.

What have you heard about the way our government is keeping the actual witnesses from B******i quiet? it is scary.

memBrain Loc: North Carolina (No longer in hiding.)

oldroy wrote:

What have you heard about the way our government is keeping the actual witnesses from B******i quiet? it is scary.

I haven't. I stopped following B******i as nothing will come of it.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

memBrain wrote:

I haven't. I stopped following B******i as nothing will come of it.

Maybe you need to pay a bit of attention to Fox the rest of this day. That Gowdy from SC is making a lot of noise on the Issa committee and Fox if playing some good stuff from a man with a changed voice and shadowed so Obama and friends can't tell who he is. Also, they had a lawyer on today who says the administration is trying to keep her from getting the proper clearance to represent one of the witnesses who were there. It is surely a dead issue with most of the media but Fox isn't a part of that media.

It is not a dead issue in the five committees of the HOuse that are still investigating what that group of witnesses wants to say. I am sure that all Obamas wish it were dead, but Fox just won't let it happen.

memBrain Loc: North Carolina (No longer in hiding.)

oldroy wrote:

Maybe you need to pay a bit of attention to Fox th... (show quote)

I'm afraid I can't. I have internet through Time Warner, but no cable. I only get local channels through the cable feed. I use Amazon Prime and Netflix for my viewing needs.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

memBrain wrote:

I'm afraid I can't. I have internet through Time Warner, but no cable. I only get local channels through the cable feed. I use Amazon Prime and Netflix for my viewing needs.

Maybe you are better off than I am. When I first got Fox on my satellite program it was my birthday in 2004 and I was so happy that I had it. Well right after my heart attack the next month I lost it but it came back pretty soon after I got out of the hospital. I believe that enough viewers, like me, must have attacked Dish about taking it down. We pay nothing extra for it just like my old favorite, CNN, that I never watch anymore.

I have wanted MSNBC but refuse to pay extra for it so I am protected by my cheapskate attitude. I guess I can go to my son's house and see it since he has the top program from Dish.

I guess you don't catch too much in the way of newscasts since you are so limited. Right now I am celebrating having Fox by all the moving talk about the new Boston bombing arrests.

memBrain Loc: North Carolina (No longer in hiding.)

oldroy wrote:

Maybe you are better off than I am. When I first ... (show quote)

MSNBC *shudder*. There is nothing "news" about that network. You couldn't pay me to watch it...

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

memBrain wrote:

MSNBC *shudder*. There is nothing "news" about that network. You couldn't pay me to watch it...

If you can't be paid to watch the channel how do you know so much about how bad it is? I ask that because I know what leaners say about Fox News and they swear they never watch it. I guess they get all their news about it from Think Progress or Media Matters. Those two blogs were formed and still paid for by George Soros so they have little to say about Fox that is any good.

memBrain Loc: North Carolina (No longer in hiding.)

oldroy wrote:

If you can't be paid to watch the channel how do you know so much about how bad it is? I ask that because I know what leaners say about Fox News and they swear they never watch it. I guess they get all their news about it from Think Progress or Media Matters. Those two blogs were formed and still paid for by George Soros so they have little to say about Fox that is any good.

Past experience. Also, I do have internet access, so I still can monitor their collective insanity...and do.

You also forgot to mention Huff-in-puff post...

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

memBrain wrote:

Past experience. Also, I do have internet access, so I still can monitor their collective insanity...and do.

You also forgot to mention Huff-in-puff post...

Hey read this little piece of crap from Mikey Weinstein and then I will bring around an article about him from HuffPo. He is one outstanding piece of crap, but atheists don't think so and most leaners don't either.

Here is a very HuffPo article about Weinstein.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-l-weinstein/fundamentalist-christian-_b_3072651.html

memBrain Loc: North Carolina (No longer in hiding.)

oldroy wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-l-weinstein/fundamentalist-christian-_b_3072651.html

I opted out of reading all of it. There's only so much one can take. We have entered the day the Bible warned of...when bad would be good, and good would be bad. How anyone can read that rant and see anything rational about it is beyond me. It seems to me that the ones who cry out the loudest that they are rational, logical beings, are in fact the exact opposite. From the beginning of the article there was nothing but a continuous stream of personal attacks, straw-men, red herrings and other fallacies. There was nothing rational about it. Given the tone, I would also consider it, by modern definitions, h**e speech. You can't fight with men like this. They are irrational and potentially psychotic. There is no reason in them. They are no better than a rabid dog.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

memBrain wrote:

I opted out of reading all of it. There's only so... (show quote)

The best of that whole thing was the kind of words used in the name calling. Didn't is seem that most leaners tend to talk just like that no matter where they are? It is just that way with the serious leaners here when they get started with the name calling.

memBrain Loc: North Carolina (No longer in hiding.)

oldroy wrote:

The best of that whole thing was the kind of words used in the name calling. Didn't is seem that most leaners tend to talk just like that no matter where they are? It is just that way with the serious leaners here when they get started with the name calling.

H**ers are filled with h**e. It kinda goes without saying. However, the fact that a serial h**er is supposed to be consulting on the next round of religious tolerance training for the military...unconscionable.