Here is the crux of the argument: the debate is about the relationship between Christ’s call for forgiveness and the legitimate powers of the state. An example of a complication: can a Christian vote on a jury for the death penalty? But the debate is not just about capital punishment but what it means to be a Christian. We can see the complications of that in our present day politics and social issues. Yet let us not take the question of the death penalty as an abstract but a true demonstration of our faith in Christ. So, yea or nay?
Below is a rather lengthy two-sided argument exploring the possible pros and cons of this question. It is, to me, a complicated question and to summarize it all seems to come down to a matter of conscience, as most disputable matters usually do. Many of you already have your made made up one way or the other. I thought I did until a half dozen articles on the subject by Christian scholars arguing both for and against. I think the question can only be resolved individually through prayer and fasting, if one is earnest in seeking the truth of the matter. So what I wrote below may be superfluous.
The philosopher Anthenagoras of Athens condemned the death penalty when he wrote that Christians “cannot endure even to see a man put to death, though justly.”
But as Christianity became more connected with state power, European Christian monarchs and governments regularly carried out the death penalty until its abolition in the 1950s through the European Convention on Human Rights. In the Western world, today, only the United States and Belarus retain capital punishment for crimes not committed during wartime. Does that fact concern you?
The question almost comes down to dueling Testaments on the subject, but not really. In the Old Testament, the concept of “an eye for eye,” is part of the Mosaic Law used in the Israelites’ justice system. The principle is that the punishment must fit the crime and there should be a just penalty for evil actions: “If there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise” (Exodus 21:23–25). Yet there is the case that God never meant this to be literal: God had already established a judicial system to hear cases and determine penalties (Exodus 18:13–26)—a system that would be unnecessary if God had intended a literal “eye for an eye” penalty.
In the New Testament, Jesus seems to overturn Mosaic Law by saying, “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’ But I tell you Do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you” (Matthew 5:39–42).
However, in giving this “new” command, Jesus is not nullifying the Old Testament law (Matthew 5:17). Rather, He is separating the responsibility of the government (to punish evildoers justly) from the responsibility we all have on a personal level before God to love our enemies. We should not seek retribution for personal slights. We are to ignore personal insults out of love of neighbor. (And for OPP members, cut each other a break, lol.)
Those Christians who support capital punishment argue that Jesus was talking about heavenly realities, not the earthly matters that governments have to deal with. Christians who oppose the death penalty say that being Christian means bringing heavenly realities to the here and now.
Excerpts taken from these two sites:
https://www.gotquestions.org/eye-for-an-eye.htmlhttps://www.whatchristianswanttoknow.com/an-eye-for-an-eye-bible-verse-and-christian-study/