permafrost wrote:
\\Good morning Seth...,,
Think how illogical your idea is.
Getting tens of thousands of people to risk deportation to v**e a single time..
v**er suppression is far more effective and easier..
got a link for the "new York City ID"?? and its use..
https://www1.nyc.gov/site/idnyc/index.pageI lived there before it was introduced, during the time they were promoting it and after they had begun issuing them. They blatantly advertised it on subway ads (those poster-style ads you see lining subway cars near ceiling level) and other public places as I.D. everyone in the five boroughs, regardless of citizenship or "other" immigrant status, could obtain that would give them the same rights and privileges of all New Yorkers.
Now, I know you folks over there on the port side are enamored of telling us supposedly less smart folk (after all how could anyone who loves America and our Constitution be as smart as those of you who want to tear the country down and the Constitution up?) that since certain things are illegal, no Democrat would even
think of doing them, but that premise has been proven rather absurd by events... Just like your reasoning that ... "Why would they risk deportation just to v**e once?" says it all.
You say something couldn't be happening in a way that takes logic into account when logic is nowhere in play. For example, mass i*****l i*********n is a Homeland Security concern, which gives the federal government the final word on the subject, yet there are sanctuary cities and states.
Also, unless the federal government has people actually dissecting local v**er rolls and checking the v**ers against immigration files, there is no actual way to determine which v**ers are actually eligible to v**e.
Example: During the infamous Bush H*****g Chad Debacle®, while the MSM and the Democrats made much hay, few noticed that of the usual myriad expatriot New Yorker retirees in Florida, thousands were v****g in Florida while double dipping by v****g in New York by absentee b****t, and since states don't share their e******n systems with one another, that (mostly) escaped notice and, at the revelation, the MSM pretended they'd heard nothing of the sort, which was good enough for Democrats, since as long as their heroes in the
Propaganda Ministry "liberal" media ignore something, the Democrats don't need to "officially" know it -- so the narrative du jour remained centered exclusively around the dreaded
h*****g chads.
So sorry, Mr. Frost, but the denizens of the left side of the American political equation are, at best, as untrustworthy and Macchiavellan a lot as any entity that is attempting to promote a change that the majority of those affected would not want any part of, and must therefore be decieved into 😎.